Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="PrairieGhost" data-source="post: 118906" data-attributes="member: 704"><p>I like some Nikon things, but I have had three Nikon rangefinders and they do about 60% of what they advertise.&nbsp; On the 3215 yd range no I was hand holding it.&nbsp; Sitting in my vehicle with the window down shooting across part of the Pipestem reservoir at a friends farm house.&nbsp; Both the Swarovski and the Sig are very fast.&nbsp; Moving it around and scanning the ranges are instantaneous at anything 1200 yds and under. The Sig struggled for seconds to get the 3215 yardage, but then it wasn't reflective just a building side.&nbsp; The Swarovski stops at 1999 yd.&nbsp; It does that easily, but acts as if it has built in limitations that stop anything beyond 1999.&nbsp; Good enough for me.&nbsp; I have owned nearly a dozen laser rangefinders and looked through many more.&nbsp; So far nothing beats the optics of the Swarovski.&nbsp; I often don't carry binocs bow hunting.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="PrairieGhost, post: 118906, member: 704"] I like some Nikon things, but I have had three Nikon rangefinders and they do about 60% of what they advertise. On the 3215 yd range no I was hand holding it. Sitting in my vehicle with the window down shooting across part of the Pipestem reservoir at a friends farm house. Both the Swarovski and the Sig are very fast. Moving it around and scanning the ranges are instantaneous at anything 1200 yds and under. The Sig struggled for seconds to get the 3215 yardage, but then it wasn't reflective just a building side. The Swarovski stops at 1999 yd. It does that easily, but acts as if it has built in limitations that stop anything beyond 1999. Good enough for me. I have owned nearly a dozen laser rangefinders and looked through many more. So far nothing beats the optics of the Swarovski. I often don't carry binocs bow hunting. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA