What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Marijuana News Tidbits
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="( deleted account )" data-source="post: 214164" data-attributes="member: 5993"><p>I read this, but the study was done on a self reporting basis which is always fraught with difficulties and valid criticisms. There was no attempt to look at blood levels, even positive urine tests, definition of recent or frequency of use, or any attempt to correlate their finding with things the pundits all seemed to be worried about! Work accidents, good or bad employee, MJ use at work during breaks, inhaled or ingested or MJ cream application, etc. Or even compared to workers efficiency deemed to have still elevated blood alcohol levels from last nights beerfest or just hung over. </p><p>Such a “study” though somewhat interesting and makes for good press, is fairly meaningless by itself, but opens up a lot of fertile territory for future research.</p><p>It is interesting they found that “recreational” use seems to go down with age, though from living in a snowbird retirement community every winter for some years, I’d bet the medicinal usage would tend to rise with age, though I get the impression true valid medicinal use is rising in all ages. Its hard to separate the wide overlap of recreational from true medicinal usage.</p><p>Their numbers do make interesting reading, but prove nothing pro or con from a medical or social standpoint.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p>The last two paragraphs are quotes from people expressing “concerns” about MJ usage, BUT, all the stuff they say, though correct, is 100% applicable to almost every cold medicine, herb, prescription medicine, alcohol, etc. (Check the labels on everything in your own medicine cabinets if you dont believe it). The only important question, as I see it, is simply: Is MJ as bad or worse than any or all of our already known and widely used drugs? Future research might give us the answer, but till then its mainly some degree of valid concerns, but mostly unsubstantiated opinions from both sides.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="( deleted account ), post: 214164, member: 5993"] I read this, but the study was done on a self reporting basis which is always fraught with difficulties and valid criticisms. There was no attempt to look at blood levels, even positive urine tests, definition of recent or frequency of use, or any attempt to correlate their finding with things the pundits all seemed to be worried about! Work accidents, good or bad employee, MJ use at work during breaks, inhaled or ingested or MJ cream application, etc. Or even compared to workers efficiency deemed to have still elevated blood alcohol levels from last nights beerfest or just hung over. Such a “study” though somewhat interesting and makes for good press, is fairly meaningless by itself, but opens up a lot of fertile territory for future research. It is interesting they found that “recreational” use seems to go down with age, though from living in a snowbird retirement community every winter for some years, I’d bet the medicinal usage would tend to rise with age, though I get the impression true valid medicinal use is rising in all ages. Its hard to separate the wide overlap of recreational from true medicinal usage. Their numbers do make interesting reading, but prove nothing pro or con from a medical or social standpoint. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] The last two paragraphs are quotes from people expressing “concerns” about MJ usage, BUT, all the stuff they say, though correct, is 100% applicable to almost every cold medicine, herb, prescription medicine, alcohol, etc. (Check the labels on everything in your own medicine cabinets if you dont believe it). The only important question, as I see it, is simply: Is MJ as bad or worse than any or all of our already known and widely used drugs? Future research might give us the answer, but till then its mainly some degree of valid concerns, but mostly unsubstantiated opinions from both sides. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Rods From god YT
Latest: svnmag
8 minutes ago
F
Tire inflator
Latest: Fester
20 minutes ago
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 11:58 PM
N
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: NodakBob
Yesterday at 10:50 PM
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: grantfurness
Yesterday at 10:00 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rut2much
Yesterday at 7:22 PM
F 150 Owners
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 5:57 PM
N
Heated jackets
Latest: ndrivrrat
Yesterday at 5:07 PM
Seekins rifles
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 4:54 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Big Iron
Yesterday at 4:33 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 3:58 PM
B
Ice fishing Sak
Latest: Bcblazek
Yesterday at 3:05 PM
Wood Planer?
Latest: BDub
Yesterday at 11:36 AM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: ktm450
Yesterday at 8:37 AM
Packers
Latest: Allen
Thursday at 11:43 PM
Montana Snowpack
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:45 PM
S
Anyone see that one coming
Latest: snow2
Thursday at 11:00 AM
Bud Heavy
Latest: Zogman
Thursday at 8:20 AM
Oops
Latest: NDSportsman
Thursday at 6:09 AM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SDMF
Wednesday at 10:33 AM
Drone defense!?!
Latest: Lycanthrope
Wednesday at 7:59 AM
Tire ? number 641
Latest: Zogman
Wednesday at 7:20 AM
Spray foam on steel??
Latest: grantfurness
Tuesday at 8:56 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Marijuana News Tidbits
Top
Bottom