What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Marijuana News Tidbits
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="( deleted account )" data-source="post: 214164" data-attributes="member: 5993"><p>I read this, but the study was done on a self reporting basis which is always fraught with difficulties and valid criticisms. There was no attempt to look at blood levels, even positive urine tests, definition of recent or frequency of use, or any attempt to correlate their finding with things the pundits all seemed to be worried about! Work accidents, good or bad employee, MJ use at work during breaks, inhaled or ingested or MJ cream application, etc. Or even compared to workers efficiency deemed to have still elevated blood alcohol levels from last nights beerfest or just hung over. </p><p>Such a “study” though somewhat interesting and makes for good press, is fairly meaningless by itself, but opens up a lot of fertile territory for future research.</p><p>It is interesting they found that “recreational” use seems to go down with age, though from living in a snowbird retirement community every winter for some years, I’d bet the medicinal usage would tend to rise with age, though I get the impression true valid medicinal use is rising in all ages. Its hard to separate the wide overlap of recreational from true medicinal usage.</p><p>Their numbers do make interesting reading, but prove nothing pro or con from a medical or social standpoint.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p>The last two paragraphs are quotes from people expressing “concerns” about MJ usage, BUT, all the stuff they say, though correct, is 100% applicable to almost every cold medicine, herb, prescription medicine, alcohol, etc. (Check the labels on everything in your own medicine cabinets if you dont believe it). The only important question, as I see it, is simply: Is MJ as bad or worse than any or all of our already known and widely used drugs? Future research might give us the answer, but till then its mainly some degree of valid concerns, but mostly unsubstantiated opinions from both sides.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="( deleted account ), post: 214164, member: 5993"] I read this, but the study was done on a self reporting basis which is always fraught with difficulties and valid criticisms. There was no attempt to look at blood levels, even positive urine tests, definition of recent or frequency of use, or any attempt to correlate their finding with things the pundits all seemed to be worried about! Work accidents, good or bad employee, MJ use at work during breaks, inhaled or ingested or MJ cream application, etc. Or even compared to workers efficiency deemed to have still elevated blood alcohol levels from last nights beerfest or just hung over. Such a “study” though somewhat interesting and makes for good press, is fairly meaningless by itself, but opens up a lot of fertile territory for future research. It is interesting they found that “recreational” use seems to go down with age, though from living in a snowbird retirement community every winter for some years, I’d bet the medicinal usage would tend to rise with age, though I get the impression true valid medicinal use is rising in all ages. Its hard to separate the wide overlap of recreational from true medicinal usage. Their numbers do make interesting reading, but prove nothing pro or con from a medical or social standpoint. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] The last two paragraphs are quotes from people expressing “concerns” about MJ usage, BUT, all the stuff they say, though correct, is 100% applicable to almost every cold medicine, herb, prescription medicine, alcohol, etc. (Check the labels on everything in your own medicine cabinets if you dont believe it). The only important question, as I see it, is simply: Is MJ as bad or worse than any or all of our already known and widely used drugs? Future research might give us the answer, but till then its mainly some degree of valid concerns, but mostly unsubstantiated opinions from both sides. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Fritz the Cat
3 minutes ago
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
6 minutes ago
P
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: pointer
13 minutes ago
Any ice reports?
Latest: DakotaGreg
54 minutes ago
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 4:44 PM
Montana to cut deer tags
Latest: Kurtr
Today at 2:03 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Today at 11:17 AM
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: KDM
Today at 8:22 AM
S
Satellite Internet
Latest: sdietrich
Yesterday at 10:34 PM
T
Let's talk EBIKES!!!
Latest: Traxion
Yesterday at 8:56 PM
Which one you did this?
Latest: bucksnbears
Yesterday at 8:29 PM
L
Hard decision -Dog
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 5:29 PM
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: tdismydog
Yesterday at 3:15 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 2:52 PM
Dickinson Sporting Complex
Latest: Wirehair
Yesterday at 10:55 AM
Health insurance
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 12:18 AM
A
Yard wide slip'n'slide
Latest: AR-15
Wednesday at 4:47 PM
Late night treat!
Latest: Davy Crockett
Wednesday at 11:48 AM
2016 Ice Castle 8x21 RV
Latest: JMF
Wednesday at 10:52 AM
M
Food porn
Latest: measure-it
Wednesday at 9:53 AM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Zogman
Wednesday at 7:21 AM
Flip-Over Shack & Diesel Heater
Latest: Whisky
Tuesday at 7:22 PM
Property Tax Credit
Latest: johnr
Tuesday at 9:49 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Marijuana News Tidbits
Top
Bottom