What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Bird Hunting
Waterfowl
MWA Dispanding after 52 years
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Traxion" data-source="post: 268466" data-attributes="member: 983"><p>I would argue waterfowl numbers have NOTHING to do with the decline in hunting. There are plenty of birds. However, a smaller migration window compared to years of old, along with significantly more difficult access, cause hunters to lose interest. In my area alone, you have to be very hardcore and proactive to have any reasonable access for field hunting. There is an outfitter and about 3 groups who have most good fields tied down well before the season. Makes putting together a hunt much more challenging. The hardcore guys are killing it for the 3x a year average Joe in a lot of cases. </p><p></p><p>Habitat is key I agree. That and land access. Add it in to what else has been said and the path sucks.</p><p></p><p>On the conservation org debate, I started a new thread. Curious to see who is supporting what and why....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Traxion, post: 268466, member: 983"] I would argue waterfowl numbers have NOTHING to do with the decline in hunting. There are plenty of birds. However, a smaller migration window compared to years of old, along with significantly more difficult access, cause hunters to lose interest. In my area alone, you have to be very hardcore and proactive to have any reasonable access for field hunting. There is an outfitter and about 3 groups who have most good fields tied down well before the season. Makes putting together a hunt much more challenging. The hardcore guys are killing it for the 3x a year average Joe in a lot of cases. Habitat is key I agree. That and land access. Add it in to what else has been said and the path sucks. On the conservation org debate, I started a new thread. Curious to see who is supporting what and why.... [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Riddle Me This.....
Latest: CatDaddy
8 minutes ago
F
Bismarck roads and driving
Latest: Fester
Today at 10:24 PM
Israel
Latest: svnmag
Today at 9:57 PM
I Love This Bar (NDA)
Latest: svnmag
Today at 8:58 PM
Answer me this
Latest: svnmag
Today at 8:49 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 8:28 PM
Quiet Pellet Gun
Latest: 3Roosters
Today at 5:26 PM
More CWD NE ND
Latest: Fritz the Cat
Today at 12:57 PM
Coffee and sweet beaver
Latest: Maddog
Today at 10:59 AM
Presidents who added the most
Latest: grumster
Today at 12:01 AM
F
Drotto adjustment?
Latest: Fester
Yesterday at 8:41 PM
Check your bags boys
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:27 PM
Tractors
Latest: Davey Crockett
Yesterday at 11:15 AM
8
Spring snows 24
Latest: 870XPRS
Thursday at 10:14 PM
R
Tract Optics
Latest: rodcontrol
Thursday at 2:22 PM
Any Birders here?
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 8:59 PM
Prairie ghost
Latest: johnr
Wednesday at 4:20 PM
S
Mega Live
Latest: SLE
Wednesday at 2:12 PM
G
A good movie
Latest: gillraker
Wednesday at 9:53 AM
Skinwalker Ranch
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 10:16 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Bird Hunting
Waterfowl
MWA Dispanding after 52 years
Top
Bottom