Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="PrairieGhost" data-source="post: 132749" data-attributes="member: 704">I noticed in the news today that the gay and lesbian etc community is very angry with Johns Hopkins hospital because their studies show their is no biological link to homosexuality.&nbsp; Years ago when gays made the biological claim they quoted a research doctor.&nbsp; Unfortunately that doctor had the scientific approach totally backwards.&nbsp; He announced the &quot;end results&quot; before he did the research.&nbsp; It got him millions for research, but he failed.&nbsp; No one wants to talk about that.&nbsp; There is no science that backs the biological theory.English psychologists are now saying pedophilia is normal.&nbsp; It will be the next perverted push in America.&nbsp; Keep in mind the people that use the term psychological science are not scientists.&nbsp; Psychology is not a science as bad as many want us to believe it.&nbsp; You can't beat 100 children once a week, 100 children twice a week, 100 children three times a week, hug 100 children once a week, hug 100 children twice a week, hug 100 children three times a week, then ignore 300 children at those same rates to verify the psychological impact.&nbsp; Psychology has to guess after the fact, and one man's guess is as good as another.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="PrairieGhost, post: 132749, member: 704"] I noticed in the news today that the gay and lesbian etc community is very angry with Johns Hopkins hospital because their studies show their is no biological link to homosexuality. Years ago when gays made the biological claim they quoted a research doctor. Unfortunately that doctor had the scientific approach totally backwards. He announced the "end results" before he did the research. It got him millions for research, but he failed. No one wants to talk about that. There is no science that backs the biological theory. English psychologists are now saying pedophilia is normal. It will be the next perverted push in America. Keep in mind the people that use the term psychological science are not scientists. Psychology is not a science as bad as many want us to believe it. You can't beat 100 children once a week, 100 children twice a week, 100 children three times a week, hug 100 children once a week, hug 100 children twice a week, hug 100 children three times a week, then ignore 300 children at those same rates to verify the psychological impact. Psychology has to guess after the fact, and one man's guess is as good as another. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA