What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
National Grasslands
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PrairieGhost" data-source="post: 176856" data-attributes="member: 704"><p>The oil companies wanted to drill on a wildlife refuge in Alaska. It was less than 1% of the land they wanted to drill on. With all the wild land in Alaska I think it was reasonable to let them drill. The logging companies tried to convince everyone that they would go out of business if they didn't get to log old growth timber. The bunny huggers tried to use and owl to turn it into an environmental issue. Old growth was less than 1/10 of 1%. Again reason should dictate in this case that they can't have it. Now we look at the badlands with only 5% designated roadless. Reasonable again should say they can't have that last five percent. For the oil companies reason is in their favor, for the logging companies and pro road people reason is not in their favor. The oil companies wanted less than 1%, but the timber and pro road people want it all. That's unreasonable. Better??????</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PrairieGhost, post: 176856, member: 704"] The oil companies wanted to drill on a wildlife refuge in Alaska. It was less than 1% of the land they wanted to drill on. With all the wild land in Alaska I think it was reasonable to let them drill. The logging companies tried to convince everyone that they would go out of business if they didn't get to log old growth timber. The bunny huggers tried to use and owl to turn it into an environmental issue. Old growth was less than 1/10 of 1%. Again reason should dictate in this case that they can't have it. Now we look at the badlands with only 5% designated roadless. Reasonable again should say they can't have that last five percent. For the oil companies reason is in their favor, for the logging companies and pro road people reason is not in their favor. The oil companies wanted less than 1%, but the timber and pro road people want it all. That's unreasonable. Better?????? [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Spring has sprung-
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Today at 4:27 AM
N
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: NodakBob
Today at 12:39 AM
Gm
Latest: shorthairsrus
Yesterday at 10:39 PM
O
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: ORCUS DEMENS
Yesterday at 8:19 PM
C
Oahe 26
Latest: camper
Yesterday at 8:15 PM
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: bucksnbears
Yesterday at 7:52 PM
Accuracy Oil YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 7:49 PM
Sale
Remington 788 222
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 6:47 PM
Little heart well pipe.
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 6:20 PM
ND bighorn sheep lottery
Latest: risingsun
Yesterday at 6:10 PM
M
Contemplating a shop build
Latest: Mike Fretty
Yesterday at 5:43 PM
POS
Latest: guywhofishes
Yesterday at 5:43 PM
S
2007 Yukon headrest
Latest: scrotcaster
Yesterday at 3:13 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Big Iron
Yesterday at 10:18 AM
S
Morels
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 9:02 AM
S
Retardation (turkey shells) YT
Latest: snow2
Tuesday at 8:41 PM
Ice Fishing
Latest: bowcarp
Tuesday at 5:59 PM
Boat carpet
Latest: Slappy
Tuesday at 5:44 PM
Sucker Minnows
Latest: Lycanthrope
Tuesday at 11:15 AM
Tea/Laxative?! YT
Latest: svnmag
Monday at 9:27 PM
Training for the outdoors
Latest: risingsun
Monday at 6:10 PM
N
Tritoon on a pontoon trailer?
Latest: NodakBob
Monday at 3:48 PM
K
Fishing in Valley City
Latest: kyle12bravo
Monday at 1:00 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
National Grasslands
Top
Bottom