What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
National Grasslands
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PrairieGhost" data-source="post: 176856" data-attributes="member: 704"><p>The oil companies wanted to drill on a wildlife refuge in Alaska. It was less than 1% of the land they wanted to drill on. With all the wild land in Alaska I think it was reasonable to let them drill. The logging companies tried to convince everyone that they would go out of business if they didn't get to log old growth timber. The bunny huggers tried to use and owl to turn it into an environmental issue. Old growth was less than 1/10 of 1%. Again reason should dictate in this case that they can't have it. Now we look at the badlands with only 5% designated roadless. Reasonable again should say they can't have that last five percent. For the oil companies reason is in their favor, for the logging companies and pro road people reason is not in their favor. The oil companies wanted less than 1%, but the timber and pro road people want it all. That's unreasonable. Better??????</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PrairieGhost, post: 176856, member: 704"] The oil companies wanted to drill on a wildlife refuge in Alaska. It was less than 1% of the land they wanted to drill on. With all the wild land in Alaska I think it was reasonable to let them drill. The logging companies tried to convince everyone that they would go out of business if they didn't get to log old growth timber. The bunny huggers tried to use and owl to turn it into an environmental issue. Old growth was less than 1/10 of 1%. Again reason should dictate in this case that they can't have it. Now we look at the badlands with only 5% designated roadless. Reasonable again should say they can't have that last five percent. For the oil companies reason is in their favor, for the logging companies and pro road people reason is not in their favor. The oil companies wanted less than 1%, but the timber and pro road people want it all. That's unreasonable. Better?????? [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Spring has sprung-
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 4:08 AM
Plum Creek Canines
Latest: tikkalover
Yesterday at 9:38 PM
Morels
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:43 PM
Fargo PD
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 6:16 PM
ND bighorn sheep lottery
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 5:56 PM
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: Sluggo
Yesterday at 5:42 PM
J
Burleigh co. Ditches debate
Latest: Johnny Five
Yesterday at 3:18 PM
G
POS
Latest: Grizzly Adams
Yesterday at 1:54 PM
Twins
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 10:01 AM
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 8:46 AM
Sale
Remington 788 222
Latest: shorthairsrus
Yesterday at 7:31 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 11:27 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Rowdie
Thursday at 9:04 PM
Little heart well pipe.
Latest: Achucker
Thursday at 1:04 PM
Oahe 26
Latest: Jiffy
Thursday at 10:58 AM
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: bucksnbears
Thursday at 7:31 AM
Gm
Latest: NDSportsman
Thursday at 7:20 AM
Accuracy Oil YT
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 7:49 PM
M
Contemplating a shop build
Latest: Mike Fretty
Wednesday at 5:43 PM
S
2007 Yukon headrest
Latest: scrotcaster
Wednesday at 3:13 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Big Iron
Wednesday at 10:18 AM
S
Retardation (turkey shells) YT
Latest: snow2
Tuesday at 8:41 PM
Ice Fishing
Latest: bowcarp
Tuesday at 5:59 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
National Grasslands
Top
Bottom