What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
National Grasslands
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PrairieGhost" data-source="post: 176856" data-attributes="member: 704"><p>The oil companies wanted to drill on a wildlife refuge in Alaska. It was less than 1% of the land they wanted to drill on. With all the wild land in Alaska I think it was reasonable to let them drill. The logging companies tried to convince everyone that they would go out of business if they didn't get to log old growth timber. The bunny huggers tried to use and owl to turn it into an environmental issue. Old growth was less than 1/10 of 1%. Again reason should dictate in this case that they can't have it. Now we look at the badlands with only 5% designated roadless. Reasonable again should say they can't have that last five percent. For the oil companies reason is in their favor, for the logging companies and pro road people reason is not in their favor. The oil companies wanted less than 1%, but the timber and pro road people want it all. That's unreasonable. Better??????</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PrairieGhost, post: 176856, member: 704"] The oil companies wanted to drill on a wildlife refuge in Alaska. It was less than 1% of the land they wanted to drill on. With all the wild land in Alaska I think it was reasonable to let them drill. The logging companies tried to convince everyone that they would go out of business if they didn't get to log old growth timber. The bunny huggers tried to use and owl to turn it into an environmental issue. Old growth was less than 1/10 of 1%. Again reason should dictate in this case that they can't have it. Now we look at the badlands with only 5% designated roadless. Reasonable again should say they can't have that last five percent. For the oil companies reason is in their favor, for the logging companies and pro road people reason is not in their favor. The oil companies wanted less than 1%, but the timber and pro road people want it all. That's unreasonable. Better?????? [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
T
Wolves at J Clark Sawyer
Latest: Twitch
37 minutes ago
C
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: camper
Today at 7:53 PM
Outdoor photo request
Latest: Zogman
Today at 5:03 PM
W
Which one you did this?
Latest: walleyeman_1875
Today at 12:17 PM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: wslayer
Today at 8:05 AM
Any ice reports?
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 8:03 PM
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 1:09 PM
S
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 9:46 AM
Deer speeds.
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 9:08 AM
6.5 Creedmore
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 8:25 AM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 8:53 PM
N
Crazy Fingers
Latest: NodakBob
Saturday at 2:39 PM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Saturday at 9:08 AM
P
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: Pheasant 54
Friday at 10:44 PM
It's been a good season.
Latest: grumster
Friday at 9:00 PM
Montana to cut deer tags
Latest: Kurtr
Friday at 2:03 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Friday at 11:17 AM
S
Satellite Internet
Latest: sdietrich
Thursday at 10:34 PM
T
Let's talk EBIKES!!!
Latest: Traxion
Thursday at 8:56 PM
L
Hard decision -Dog
Latest: LBrandt
Thursday at 5:29 PM
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: tdismydog
Thursday at 3:15 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
Thursday at 2:52 PM
Dickinson Sporting Complex
Latest: Wirehair
Thursday at 10:55 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
National Grasslands
Top
Bottom