What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
National Grasslands
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fly Carpin" data-source="post: 177132" data-attributes="member: 1187"><p>It's funny how if someone takes a stance for something they believe in, your green decoy sources call it a "guise" if it doesn't align with their ideals. Can you prove, with sources that have a bit more credibility than green decoy, which is essentially the mirror opposite of the Center for Biological Diversity, that BHA is using hunting and fishing on public lands as a "guise" for their "anti-development agenda"? Please, if you can, provide a source that isn't so clearly biased one way or another. Maybe BHA is a bunch of public land users who feel their piece of the oft mentioned multiple use agreement is taking it in the shorts in some areas, and they fear the same incrimentalism that you do, just from the opposite side of the table? For what it's worth these questions are merely rhetorical food for thought.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fly Carpin, post: 177132, member: 1187"] It's funny how if someone takes a stance for something they believe in, your green decoy sources call it a "guise" if it doesn't align with their ideals. Can you prove, with sources that have a bit more credibility than green decoy, which is essentially the mirror opposite of the Center for Biological Diversity, that BHA is using hunting and fishing on public lands as a "guise" for their "anti-development agenda"? Please, if you can, provide a source that isn't so clearly biased one way or another. Maybe BHA is a bunch of public land users who feel their piece of the oft mentioned multiple use agreement is taking it in the shorts in some areas, and they fear the same incrimentalism that you do, just from the opposite side of the table? For what it's worth these questions are merely rhetorical food for thought. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
31 minutes ago
R
Seekins rifles
Latest: Ruttin
53 minutes ago
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 9:04 AM
Cheaper Lithium for FFS shuttl
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 8:52 AM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 8:47 AM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: Allen
Today at 8:34 AM
L
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: LBrandt
Today at 2:37 AM
C
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: camper
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
Wood Planer?
Latest: risingsun
Yesterday at 1:51 PM
N
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: NodakBob
Yesterday at 9:35 AM
Tire inflator
Latest: ndfinfan
Yesterday at 7:18 AM
F 150 Owners
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 5:55 AM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Rut2much
Saturday at 10:21 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 7:16 AM
Eat steak wear real fur
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 6:54 AM
P
Anyone see that one coming
Latest: PrairieGhost
Saturday at 6:42 AM
Rods From god YT
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 1:36 AM
N
Heated jackets
Latest: ndrivrrat
Friday at 5:07 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Davy Crockett
Friday at 3:58 PM
B
Ice fishing Sak
Latest: Bcblazek
Friday at 3:05 PM
Packers
Latest: Allen
Thursday at 11:43 PM
Montana Snowpack
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:45 PM
Bud Heavy
Latest: Zogman
Thursday at 8:20 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
National Grasslands
Top
Bottom