What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
National Grasslands
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fly Carpin" data-source="post: 177132" data-attributes="member: 1187"><p>It's funny how if someone takes a stance for something they believe in, your green decoy sources call it a "guise" if it doesn't align with their ideals. Can you prove, with sources that have a bit more credibility than green decoy, which is essentially the mirror opposite of the Center for Biological Diversity, that BHA is using hunting and fishing on public lands as a "guise" for their "anti-development agenda"? Please, if you can, provide a source that isn't so clearly biased one way or another. Maybe BHA is a bunch of public land users who feel their piece of the oft mentioned multiple use agreement is taking it in the shorts in some areas, and they fear the same incrimentalism that you do, just from the opposite side of the table? For what it's worth these questions are merely rhetorical food for thought.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fly Carpin, post: 177132, member: 1187"] It's funny how if someone takes a stance for something they believe in, your green decoy sources call it a "guise" if it doesn't align with their ideals. Can you prove, with sources that have a bit more credibility than green decoy, which is essentially the mirror opposite of the Center for Biological Diversity, that BHA is using hunting and fishing on public lands as a "guise" for their "anti-development agenda"? Please, if you can, provide a source that isn't so clearly biased one way or another. Maybe BHA is a bunch of public land users who feel their piece of the oft mentioned multiple use agreement is taking it in the shorts in some areas, and they fear the same incrimentalism that you do, just from the opposite side of the table? For what it's worth these questions are merely rhetorical food for thought. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Remote camera options
Latest: Obi-Wan
1 minute ago
Batten down the hatches!
Latest: Davy Crockett
42 minutes ago
Property Tax Credit
Latest: Slappy
51 minutes ago
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Davy Crockett
55 minutes ago
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: Shockwave
Today at 9:10 AM
Outdoor photo request
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 8:33 AM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Today at 8:25 AM
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 7:11 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 6:27 AM
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 11:32 PM
Satellite Internet
Latest: grantfurness
Yesterday at 10:11 PM
R
Any ice reports?
Latest: riverview
Yesterday at 9:25 PM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 7:57 PM
Alkaline lake ice conditions?
Latest: NDSportsman
Yesterday at 2:55 PM
N
ION gen2 8"
Latest: ndrivrrat
Tuesday at 5:43 PM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:51 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:43 PM
Wolves at J Clark Sawyer
Latest: Davy Crockett
Tuesday at 11:08 AM
W
Which one you did this?
Latest: walleyeman_1875
Monday at 12:17 PM
S
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: snow2
Sunday at 9:46 AM
Deer speeds.
Latest: Kurtr
Sunday at 9:08 AM
6.5 Creedmore
Latest: Jiffy
Sunday at 8:25 AM
N
Crazy Fingers
Latest: NodakBob
Saturday at 2:39 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
National Grasslands
Top
Bottom