Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 177137" data-attributes="member: 373">And that is what the links I provide are as well, a little food for thought based on actual fact. So if you wish to show where the information presented in the green decoy link is NOT fact please do because I will be the first to remove anything that is not true. - - - Updated - - -Hey most people support taking care of these wild lands for future generations as do I and I do know some sportsmen like yourself believe in continuing these multiple uses on these lands as wellSo here is a question for those like plains who claim THAT is their goal opposed to people like my self that want to graze every spear of grass according to him. at least two generations before us have logged and grazed and mined these public lands under those promised multiple use agreements alongside those that recreate on them. So for two generations those actions happened on these lands and yet we still have opportunities that he wants to &quot;save&quot; for future generations. So these opportunities even WITH promised multiple uses apparently have not been so bad given the opportunities we now have are worth &quot;saving&quot;. Yet groups like the ones we mention believe the only way to &quot;save&quot; these opportunities is by removing what two generations have worked side by side with. Why? And they are using &quot;green decoys&quot; to accomplish that. THAT is what fritz and I bring to light by sharing links to facts.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="gst, post: 177137, member: 373"] [COLOR=#0000ff][B]And that is what the links I provide are as well, a little food for thought based on actual fact. So if you wish to show where the information presented in the green decoy link is NOT fact please do because I will be the first to remove anything that is not true. [/B][/COLOR] [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] Hey most people support taking care of these wild lands for future generations as do I and I do know some sportsmen like yourself believe in continuing these multiple uses on these lands as well So here is a question for those like plains who claim THAT is their goal opposed to people like my self that want to graze every spear of grass according to him. at least two generations before us have logged and grazed and mined these public lands under those promised multiple use agreements alongside those that recreate on them. So for two generations those actions happened on these lands and yet we still have opportunities that he wants to "save" for future generations. So these opportunities even WITH promised multiple uses apparently have not been so bad given the opportunities we now have are worth "saving". Yet groups like the ones we mention believe the only way to "save" these opportunities is by removing what two generations have worked side by side with. Why? And they are using "green decoys" to accomplish that. THAT is what fritz and I bring to light by sharing links to facts. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA