Reply to thread

Message

I’d say we can expect Burgum to be the next Secretary of Interior. Hard to say what that will mean. But given Trump’s administration the last time around, I have a feeling it will not be an overall benefit to public land hunters. I’d really like to see the Republican Party change their stance on public lands. Honestly, I think that would not only solidify the hunting vote for them, but I think it would also make their lives a lot easier. Republicans proposing/pushing for transfers or selling public lands is really one of the only issues that conservatives I know get really pissed off about.

But I would agree that Deb Haaland and Tracy Stone manning, overall have been a disappointment for hunters and anglers in my opinion. Obviously, generally speaking, democrats are more friendly to public lands, but for this administration I wouldn’t say that’s necessarily the case. Stone Manning was actually trying to give BLM land in ND directly to the tribes for nothing…Just hand it to em.

Tester is one of the few democrats who has overall been good to hunters. Honestly, I’m not that familiar with his stances on other issues, but he’s been real good for hunters on the issues I’m aware of. Randy talks about that in the video above.

<blockquote data-quote="BrockW" data-source="post: 431008" data-attributes="member: 5910">I’d say we can expect Burgum to be the next Secretary of Interior. Hard to say what that will mean. But given Trump’s administration the last time around, I have a feeling it will not be an overall benefit to public land hunters. I’d really like to see the Republican Party change their stance on public lands. Honestly, I think that would not only solidify the hunting vote for them, but I think it would also make their lives a lot easier. Republicans proposing/pushing for transfers or selling public lands is really one of the only issues that conservatives I know get really pissed off about. But I would agree that Deb Haaland and Tracy Stone manning, overall have been a disappointment for hunters and anglers in my opinion. Obviously, generally speaking, democrats are more friendly to public lands, but for this administration I wouldn’t say that’s necessarily the case. Stone Manning was actually trying to give BLM land in ND directly to the tribes for nothing…Just hand it to em. Tester is one of the few democrats who has overall been good to hunters. Honestly, I’m not that familiar with his stances on other issues, but he’s been real good for hunters on the issues I’m aware of. Randy talks about that in the video above.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BrockW, post: 431008, member: 5910"] I’d say we can expect Burgum to be the next Secretary of Interior. Hard to say what that will mean. But given Trump’s administration the last time around, I have a feeling it will not be an overall benefit to public land hunters. I’d really like to see the Republican Party change their stance on public lands. Honestly, I think that would not only solidify the hunting vote for them, but I think it would also make their lives a lot easier. Republicans proposing/pushing for transfers or selling public lands is really one of the only issues that conservatives I know get really pissed off about. But I would agree that Deb Haaland and Tracy Stone manning, overall have been a disappointment for hunters and anglers in my opinion. Obviously, generally speaking, democrats are more friendly to public lands, but for this administration I wouldn’t say that’s necessarily the case. Stone Manning was actually trying to give BLM land in ND directly to the tribes for nothing…Just hand it to em. Tester is one of the few democrats who has overall been good to hunters. Honestly, I’m not that familiar with his stances on other issues, but he’s been real good for hunters on the issues I’m aware of. Randy talks about that in the video above. [/QUOTE]

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA