What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
New Land Bills: SB 2036, 2037 and 2038
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dirty" data-source="post: 314330" data-attributes="member: 6535"><p>Pass this stupid posting law before it gets even dumber and pacify the dumbasses who are pressing so hard for it. I am pretty firmly convinced that the longer you fight it the worse the outcome will be. I feel like this point has been proven already. On both ends you now have people forcing the hands of those who never had an issue with how things were set up, and the amount of resources and money being wasted continues to add up. </p><p></p><p>Once it passes (and it will), since the G&F is (should be) very concerned about salvaging a good relationship between the downright decent folks (hunters and landowers and the non hunting and non landowning public) who never had a big issue with this on either side, they should provide free metal signs to all landowners who want them. Not just any free metal signs, but signs that read something like:</p><p></p><p>1) Open to hunting</p><p>2) Hunting allowed with permission</p><p>3) Access allowed between the dates xxx and yyy</p><p>4) Access allowed for the following: fishing, hiking, xxx, yyy, etc. </p><p></p><p>The landowners who didn't want this should not have to spend one damn cent or one ounce of energy because of it. They should not have to post their land as “open” when they never had to do that before. They should not have to field phone calls from hunters when they didn’t have to do that before. They should not have an additional burden when they never had a problem to begin with. So the G&F themselves or some volunteer organizations of their choice should put these signs up for them, as they do PLOTS signs. After all, it is essentially the same...private land that is open to sportsmen. Here is your new opportunity, G&F...make it count.</p><p></p><p>Come on Game and Fish, step up to the plate and deliver on this...help out landowners who never wanted to post their land or never minded it being accessed. Help out hunters and the general public by helping to easily display the land that was never meant to be posted. And if the Game and Fish is truly only concerned about money like some people believe, this is still a win because you are creating access and strengthening relationships which should only increase hunter participation and license sales - all for the low cost of Putting up some signs. </p><p></p><p>The goofy sons of bitches who have sold their souls to the devil to create as big of a rift between honest to goodness landowners and hunters, and also those landowners and hunters who have been way out in left and right field the whole time and would never give an inch on this can all collectively go to hell as far as I'm concerned. The mess we are left with now is your doing in my personal opinion. Both groups have that entitlement attitude beyond my own belief. “Do what benefits me the most, but after that - leave me alone.”</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dirty, post: 314330, member: 6535"] Pass this stupid posting law before it gets even dumber and pacify the dumbasses who are pressing so hard for it. I am pretty firmly convinced that the longer you fight it the worse the outcome will be. I feel like this point has been proven already. On both ends you now have people forcing the hands of those who never had an issue with how things were set up, and the amount of resources and money being wasted continues to add up. Once it passes (and it will), since the G&F is (should be) very concerned about salvaging a good relationship between the downright decent folks (hunters and landowers and the non hunting and non landowning public) who never had a big issue with this on either side, they should provide free metal signs to all landowners who want them. Not just any free metal signs, but signs that read something like: 1) Open to hunting 2) Hunting allowed with permission 3) Access allowed between the dates xxx and yyy 4) Access allowed for the following: fishing, hiking, xxx, yyy, etc. The landowners who didn't want this should not have to spend one damn cent or one ounce of energy because of it. They should not have to post their land as “open” when they never had to do that before. They should not have to field phone calls from hunters when they didn’t have to do that before. They should not have an additional burden when they never had a problem to begin with. So the G&F themselves or some volunteer organizations of their choice should put these signs up for them, as they do PLOTS signs. After all, it is essentially the same...private land that is open to sportsmen. Here is your new opportunity, G&F...make it count. Come on Game and Fish, step up to the plate and deliver on this...help out landowners who never wanted to post their land or never minded it being accessed. Help out hunters and the general public by helping to easily display the land that was never meant to be posted. And if the Game and Fish is truly only concerned about money like some people believe, this is still a win because you are creating access and strengthening relationships which should only increase hunter participation and license sales - all for the low cost of Putting up some signs. The goofy sons of bitches who have sold their souls to the devil to create as big of a rift between honest to goodness landowners and hunters, and also those landowners and hunters who have been way out in left and right field the whole time and would never give an inch on this can all collectively go to hell as far as I'm concerned. The mess we are left with now is your doing in my personal opinion. Both groups have that entitlement attitude beyond my own belief. “Do what benefits me the most, but after that - leave me alone.” [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
More CWD NE ND
Latest: Average_NDA_Member
11 minutes ago
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 9:08 AM
Riddle Me This.....
Latest: wslayer
Today at 9:01 AM
Drotto adjustment?
Latest: shorthairsrus
Today at 8:22 AM
Bismarck roads and driving
Latest: Davey Crockett
Today at 6:28 AM
Israel
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:57 PM
I Love This Bar (NDA)
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:58 PM
Answer me this
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:49 PM
Quiet Pellet Gun
Latest: 3Roosters
Yesterday at 5:26 PM
Coffee and sweet beaver
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 10:59 AM
Presidents who added the most
Latest: grumster
Yesterday at 12:01 AM
Check your bags boys
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 8:27 PM
Tractors
Latest: Davey Crockett
Friday at 11:15 AM
8
Spring snows 24
Latest: 870XPRS
Thursday at 10:14 PM
R
Tract Optics
Latest: rodcontrol
Thursday at 2:22 PM
Any Birders here?
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 8:59 PM
Prairie ghost
Latest: johnr
Wednesday at 4:20 PM
S
Mega Live
Latest: SLE
Wednesday at 2:12 PM
G
A good movie
Latest: gillraker
Wednesday at 9:53 AM
Skinwalker Ranch
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 10:16 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
New Land Bills: SB 2036, 2037 and 2038
Top
Bottom