What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other
Sports
NFL News (Vikings)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coyote Hunter" data-source="post: 104826" data-attributes="member: 486"><p>How well has it worked for the Vikings to have a mediocre QB (maybe bottom 3rd in the league) leading the team? They need to try something new to get over the hump and I am fired up with the idea of the Vikings being set at QB. Any team that has a franchise QB has a risk of injury and if any of those teams lose their QB they will be in trouble for that year (ex. Packers). It is a 3 year deal, not a 10 year deal so the risk is minimal.</p><p></p><p>It amuses me how people are so upset with this deal. The alternative was to pay Keenum $3 million less a year than Cousins and hope that he didn't play above his skills last year. The chance of a regression were very high. Look at what Teddy, Case, and Bradford got paid. If you think the Vikings made a mistake, what do you think of the Broncos, Jets, and Arizona? If you take away those four options... what do you suggest were the Viking's other options???</p><p></p><p>I think the Vikings absolutely did the right thing! Skol Vikings!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coyote Hunter, post: 104826, member: 486"] How well has it worked for the Vikings to have a mediocre QB (maybe bottom 3rd in the league) leading the team? They need to try something new to get over the hump and I am fired up with the idea of the Vikings being set at QB. Any team that has a franchise QB has a risk of injury and if any of those teams lose their QB they will be in trouble for that year (ex. Packers). It is a 3 year deal, not a 10 year deal so the risk is minimal. It amuses me how people are so upset with this deal. The alternative was to pay Keenum $3 million less a year than Cousins and hope that he didn't play above his skills last year. The chance of a regression were very high. Look at what Teddy, Case, and Bradford got paid. If you think the Vikings made a mistake, what do you think of the Broncos, Jets, and Arizona? If you take away those four options... what do you suggest were the Viking's other options??? I think the Vikings absolutely did the right thing! Skol Vikings! [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Oahe 26
Latest: Rowdie
3 minutes ago
Creek Chubs
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 11:10 AM
I
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: Iwhackwheat
Today at 10:58 AM
F
WTB
Dog Proof traps
Latest: Fly Carpin
Today at 8:59 AM
Li time lithium batteries
Latest: Allen Gamble
Today at 8:13 AM
Loosing my faith in humanity
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:34 PM
L
Food porn
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 8:58 PM
Gas prices
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 7:35 PM
W
Eating Nelson Lake Fish
Latest: walleyewanker
Yesterday at 6:00 PM
Fire Line
Latest: Zogman
Sunday at 7:11 AM
NWT Mobridge 2026
Latest: Rowdie
Saturday at 10:21 PM
Pointless Ammo YT
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 9:58 PM
W
RIP Kyle Busch
Latest: woodduck30
Saturday at 9:26 PM
M
Lawnmower starting issue
Latest: Motor Mouse
Saturday at 9:26 PM
X
Boat Ramp Play-by-Play
Latest: xFishSlayerx
Saturday at 11:52 AM
If You Can't Sleep YT
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 9:45 PM
Greyboe Rifle Stocks
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 8:53 PM
Scientists?
Latest: bucksnbears
Friday at 8:36 PM
5.3 GM ?
Latest: Zogman
Friday at 5:35 PM
S
Young Mallard Hen
Latest: snow2
Friday at 2:10 PM
Tour Level Gold - Sak
Latest: CatDaddy
Friday at 12:10 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Other
Sports
NFL News (Vikings)
Top
Bottom