What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other
Sports
NFL News (Vikings)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coyote Hunter" data-source="post: 104826" data-attributes="member: 486"><p>How well has it worked for the Vikings to have a mediocre QB (maybe bottom 3rd in the league) leading the team? They need to try something new to get over the hump and I am fired up with the idea of the Vikings being set at QB. Any team that has a franchise QB has a risk of injury and if any of those teams lose their QB they will be in trouble for that year (ex. Packers). It is a 3 year deal, not a 10 year deal so the risk is minimal.</p><p></p><p>It amuses me how people are so upset with this deal. The alternative was to pay Keenum $3 million less a year than Cousins and hope that he didn't play above his skills last year. The chance of a regression were very high. Look at what Teddy, Case, and Bradford got paid. If you think the Vikings made a mistake, what do you think of the Broncos, Jets, and Arizona? If you take away those four options... what do you suggest were the Viking's other options???</p><p></p><p>I think the Vikings absolutely did the right thing! Skol Vikings!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coyote Hunter, post: 104826, member: 486"] How well has it worked for the Vikings to have a mediocre QB (maybe bottom 3rd in the league) leading the team? They need to try something new to get over the hump and I am fired up with the idea of the Vikings being set at QB. Any team that has a franchise QB has a risk of injury and if any of those teams lose their QB they will be in trouble for that year (ex. Packers). It is a 3 year deal, not a 10 year deal so the risk is minimal. It amuses me how people are so upset with this deal. The alternative was to pay Keenum $3 million less a year than Cousins and hope that he didn't play above his skills last year. The chance of a regression were very high. Look at what Teddy, Case, and Bradford got paid. If you think the Vikings made a mistake, what do you think of the Broncos, Jets, and Arizona? If you take away those four options... what do you suggest were the Viking's other options??? I think the Vikings absolutely did the right thing! Skol Vikings! [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Memes
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 11:39 AM
T
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: Twitch
Today at 9:09 AM
M
Oahe, Smelt, thoughts?
Latest: Migrator Man
Today at 8:25 AM
J
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: jer79
Today at 1:14 AM
D
March 29
Latest: db-2
Today at 12:55 AM
You’re never a nobody.
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 11:43 PM
Spring Turkey 2025
Latest: Freedom
Yesterday at 9:27 PM
Let's See a BaseBall Game
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 5:49 PM
Destination Fishing Trip??
Latest: johnr
Yesterday at 4:06 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Yesterday at 3:38 PM
Jerkbaits In a Pool
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 12:38 PM
Ready or not, here it comes.
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 6:28 AM
Spring Snows
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Thursday at 8:32 PM
W
Open water?
Latest: Wall-eyes
Thursday at 2:19 PM
R
The Birds.........
Latest: Retired Educator
Thursday at 1:52 PM
L
Handgun Choices
Latest: LBrandt
Thursday at 1:49 PM
NDSFC Annual Banquet April 26
Latest: Honkerherms
Wednesday at 7:15 PM
Possible ban ffs sota
Latest: Captainbrad
Wednesday at 7:35 AM
Same Dean Nelson?
Latest: Davey Crockett
Wednesday at 6:12 AM
M
Getting into Canada
Latest: measure-it
Tuesday at 6:19 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Other
Sports
NFL News (Vikings)
Top
Bottom