What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other
Sports
NFL News (Vikings)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coyote Hunter" data-source="post: 104826" data-attributes="member: 486"><p>How well has it worked for the Vikings to have a mediocre QB (maybe bottom 3rd in the league) leading the team? They need to try something new to get over the hump and I am fired up with the idea of the Vikings being set at QB. Any team that has a franchise QB has a risk of injury and if any of those teams lose their QB they will be in trouble for that year (ex. Packers). It is a 3 year deal, not a 10 year deal so the risk is minimal.</p><p></p><p>It amuses me how people are so upset with this deal. The alternative was to pay Keenum $3 million less a year than Cousins and hope that he didn't play above his skills last year. The chance of a regression were very high. Look at what Teddy, Case, and Bradford got paid. If you think the Vikings made a mistake, what do you think of the Broncos, Jets, and Arizona? If you take away those four options... what do you suggest were the Viking's other options???</p><p></p><p>I think the Vikings absolutely did the right thing! Skol Vikings!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coyote Hunter, post: 104826, member: 486"] How well has it worked for the Vikings to have a mediocre QB (maybe bottom 3rd in the league) leading the team? They need to try something new to get over the hump and I am fired up with the idea of the Vikings being set at QB. Any team that has a franchise QB has a risk of injury and if any of those teams lose their QB they will be in trouble for that year (ex. Packers). It is a 3 year deal, not a 10 year deal so the risk is minimal. It amuses me how people are so upset with this deal. The alternative was to pay Keenum $3 million less a year than Cousins and hope that he didn't play above his skills last year. The chance of a regression were very high. Look at what Teddy, Case, and Bradford got paid. If you think the Vikings made a mistake, what do you think of the Broncos, Jets, and Arizona? If you take away those four options... what do you suggest were the Viking's other options??? I think the Vikings absolutely did the right thing! Skol Vikings! [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
12 minutes ago
A
Bitcoin
Latest: Auggie
16 minutes ago
Hobby
Latest: Maddog
Today at 5:10 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Maddog
Today at 5:08 AM
CCI Uppercut JHP ammo?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:31 PM
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:29 PM
Outdoor photo request
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 5:42 PM
Wood Stoves
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 5:08 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: sweeney
Yesterday at 5:01 PM
ICE Fishing videos
Latest: tikkalover
Yesterday at 3:24 PM
ND concealed Weapons Permit
Latest: Maddog
Wednesday at 6:45 PM
Heated jackets
Latest: wslayer
Wednesday at 4:36 PM
T
Cheaper Lithium for FFS shuttl
Latest: Traxion
Wednesday at 12:52 PM
Newbie here.
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 9:00 PM
What are these things?
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 8:27 PM
S
F 150 Owners
Latest: snow2
Tuesday at 6:50 PM
S
Backyard chickens?
Latest: snow2
Tuesday at 4:11 PM
sharpening auger blades
Latest: risingsun
Tuesday at 3:58 PM
S
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: savage270
Tuesday at 12:43 PM
D
Catfish anyone?
Latest: Downrigger
Tuesday at 8:08 AM
Seekins rifles
Latest: Jiffy
Monday at 3:23 PM
Tire inflator
Latest: 5575
Monday at 1:09 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Monday at 9:33 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Other
Sports
NFL News (Vikings)
Top
Bottom