What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other
Sports
NFL News (Vikings)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coyote Hunter" data-source="post: 104826" data-attributes="member: 486"><p>How well has it worked for the Vikings to have a mediocre QB (maybe bottom 3rd in the league) leading the team? They need to try something new to get over the hump and I am fired up with the idea of the Vikings being set at QB. Any team that has a franchise QB has a risk of injury and if any of those teams lose their QB they will be in trouble for that year (ex. Packers). It is a 3 year deal, not a 10 year deal so the risk is minimal.</p><p></p><p>It amuses me how people are so upset with this deal. The alternative was to pay Keenum $3 million less a year than Cousins and hope that he didn't play above his skills last year. The chance of a regression were very high. Look at what Teddy, Case, and Bradford got paid. If you think the Vikings made a mistake, what do you think of the Broncos, Jets, and Arizona? If you take away those four options... what do you suggest were the Viking's other options???</p><p></p><p>I think the Vikings absolutely did the right thing! Skol Vikings!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coyote Hunter, post: 104826, member: 486"] How well has it worked for the Vikings to have a mediocre QB (maybe bottom 3rd in the league) leading the team? They need to try something new to get over the hump and I am fired up with the idea of the Vikings being set at QB. Any team that has a franchise QB has a risk of injury and if any of those teams lose their QB they will be in trouble for that year (ex. Packers). It is a 3 year deal, not a 10 year deal so the risk is minimal. It amuses me how people are so upset with this deal. The alternative was to pay Keenum $3 million less a year than Cousins and hope that he didn't play above his skills last year. The chance of a regression were very high. Look at what Teddy, Case, and Bradford got paid. If you think the Vikings made a mistake, what do you think of the Broncos, Jets, and Arizona? If you take away those four options... what do you suggest were the Viking's other options??? I think the Vikings absolutely did the right thing! Skol Vikings! [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Assistance on the water
Latest: Paddledogger
56 minutes ago
T
Sharptails/Huns with labradors
Latest: Traxion
57 minutes ago
Battery operated coolers
Latest: johnr
Today at 11:37 AM
Canada Smoke
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 10:03 AM
F
Camera
Latest: Flannel
Today at 8:18 AM
***FOUND***
Latest: CatDaddy
Yesterday at 11:18 PM
Sak
Van Hook Crankbaits
Latest: shorthairsrus
Yesterday at 8:26 PM
Creek Chubs
Latest: Sum1
Yesterday at 7:14 PM
Carfax???
Latest: BrokenBackJack
Yesterday at 11:11 AM
Switched at birth
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 8:44 AM
For us oldies
Latest: Zogman
Yesterday at 6:57 AM
Fishing videos
Latest: Rowdie
Sunday at 11:54 PM
Governors Cup 2025
Latest: Rowdie
Sunday at 7:50 PM
Garden tractor wash port
Latest: lunkerslayer
Sunday at 6:24 AM
Food porn
Latest: tikkalover
Saturday at 9:39 PM
Cool new Gadgets
Latest: Davy Crockett
Saturday at 8:21 PM
Shooting reduced recoil 30-06
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 8:15 PM
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: BDub
Saturday at 6:30 PM
MT Governors Cup 2026 results
Latest: Rowdie
Saturday at 4:14 PM
FLOCK Cameras...Thoughts
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 12:35 PM
Only a Shorthairs
Latest: shorthairsrus
Saturday at 11:24 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Other
Sports
NFL News (Vikings)
Top
Bottom