What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other
Sports
NFL News (Vikings)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coyote Hunter" data-source="post: 104826" data-attributes="member: 486"><p>How well has it worked for the Vikings to have a mediocre QB (maybe bottom 3rd in the league) leading the team? They need to try something new to get over the hump and I am fired up with the idea of the Vikings being set at QB. Any team that has a franchise QB has a risk of injury and if any of those teams lose their QB they will be in trouble for that year (ex. Packers). It is a 3 year deal, not a 10 year deal so the risk is minimal.</p><p></p><p>It amuses me how people are so upset with this deal. The alternative was to pay Keenum $3 million less a year than Cousins and hope that he didn't play above his skills last year. The chance of a regression were very high. Look at what Teddy, Case, and Bradford got paid. If you think the Vikings made a mistake, what do you think of the Broncos, Jets, and Arizona? If you take away those four options... what do you suggest were the Viking's other options???</p><p></p><p>I think the Vikings absolutely did the right thing! Skol Vikings!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coyote Hunter, post: 104826, member: 486"] How well has it worked for the Vikings to have a mediocre QB (maybe bottom 3rd in the league) leading the team? They need to try something new to get over the hump and I am fired up with the idea of the Vikings being set at QB. Any team that has a franchise QB has a risk of injury and if any of those teams lose their QB they will be in trouble for that year (ex. Packers). It is a 3 year deal, not a 10 year deal so the risk is minimal. It amuses me how people are so upset with this deal. The alternative was to pay Keenum $3 million less a year than Cousins and hope that he didn't play above his skills last year. The chance of a regression were very high. Look at what Teddy, Case, and Bradford got paid. If you think the Vikings made a mistake, what do you think of the Broncos, Jets, and Arizona? If you take away those four options... what do you suggest were the Viking's other options??? I think the Vikings absolutely did the right thing! Skol Vikings! [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
P
.22 Magnum/.17HMR Discussion
Latest: Prairie Doggin'
2 minutes ago
D
Pointing British Lab Pups
Latest: Downrigger
22 minutes ago
C
Camper
Latest: camper
Today at 8:45 PM
T
Fall fishing?
Latest: Traxion
Today at 8:29 PM
A
Primary Residence Credit?
Latest: ale
Today at 7:53 PM
Free Lunch
Latest: Skeeter
Today at 6:34 PM
H
migration 26
Latest: honkerslayer
Today at 5:44 PM
Sticker Shock
Latest: Colt45
Today at 5:35 PM
Crude oil prices!
Latest: Colt45
Today at 5:29 PM
Measure 1 Yes/No
Latest: Wally World
Today at 2:56 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Today at 12:42 PM
G&F at it again
Latest: eyexer
Today at 12:40 PM
Favorite Deer Mount Pose
Latest: Shockwave
Today at 12:39 PM
S
Drone defense!?!
Latest: snow2
Today at 11:41 AM
S
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: snow2
Today at 11:01 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: NDSportsman
Today at 6:12 AM
In The Booth
Latest: eyexer
Yesterday at 6:06 PM
Bird Identification
Latest: eyexer
Yesterday at 6:05 PM
A
90 Million Missing NDDF
Latest: ale
Yesterday at 1:02 PM
1
Strange year.
Latest: 1850reata
Monday at 8:54 AM
B
Food porn
Latest: Browneye
Sunday at 6:41 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Other
Sports
NFL News (Vikings)
Top
Bottom