What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
No Trespass Law
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="njsimonson" data-source="post: 246637" data-attributes="member: 1507"><p>You're all correct...this alleged compromise has not been released (yet), but the proponents of SB 2315 had no issue hyping it up last week, despite having NO IDEA what's in it, beyond some napkin scribbles after Erbele came back hat-in-hand to the committee looking for any sort of win for his big money buddies. My fear is the electronic proposal touted by them will add a layer of complexity, confusion, will frustrate landowner efforts to effectively post their land, and cause further unintended trespass and ultimately, will not prevent poachers and trespassers from breaking the law, while hurting hunter access and the G&F's bottom line. But...I haven't seen the bill yet. Keep pushing NO on SB 2315. </p><p></p><p>I'd be more in favor of the alleged electronic "compromise" system if: 1) all land started out as unposted; 2) land could be electronically posted and unposted on a weekly basis (ie: post for deer gun season, but open for late-season pheasant); 3) it was easy to manage for the IT group it is assigned to 4) it didn't cost a ton of money that was put on sportsmen; 5) the GIS program was available in phone and chip format (with periodic updates) and, probably most importantly 6) we had two more years to figure it all out and get it right, instead of it being just slopped together in some out-of-public-sight hoghouse bill which I fully anticipate will happen. The latter is the biggest concern. </p><p></p><p>Rumor had it the vote count was Nay 30, Yay 17 or so with a couple up in the air on the original SB 2315, thanks in great part to the people here and elsewhere hammering legislators on the topic. Statements such as "I've received 10 emails for SB 2315 for every 1 for any other bill" were frequent from legislators and "most were opposed" was the sentiment. We'll keep that pressure up if the new version looks like garbage. Stay tuned...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="njsimonson, post: 246637, member: 1507"] You're all correct...this alleged compromise has not been released (yet), but the proponents of SB 2315 had no issue hyping it up last week, despite having NO IDEA what's in it, beyond some napkin scribbles after Erbele came back hat-in-hand to the committee looking for any sort of win for his big money buddies. My fear is the electronic proposal touted by them will add a layer of complexity, confusion, will frustrate landowner efforts to effectively post their land, and cause further unintended trespass and ultimately, will not prevent poachers and trespassers from breaking the law, while hurting hunter access and the G&F's bottom line. But...I haven't seen the bill yet. Keep pushing NO on SB 2315. I'd be more in favor of the alleged electronic "compromise" system if: 1) all land started out as unposted; 2) land could be electronically posted and unposted on a weekly basis (ie: post for deer gun season, but open for late-season pheasant); 3) it was easy to manage for the IT group it is assigned to 4) it didn't cost a ton of money that was put on sportsmen; 5) the GIS program was available in phone and chip format (with periodic updates) and, probably most importantly 6) we had two more years to figure it all out and get it right, instead of it being just slopped together in some out-of-public-sight hoghouse bill which I fully anticipate will happen. The latter is the biggest concern. Rumor had it the vote count was Nay 30, Yay 17 or so with a couple up in the air on the original SB 2315, thanks in great part to the people here and elsewhere hammering legislators on the topic. Statements such as "I've received 10 emails for SB 2315 for every 1 for any other bill" were frequent from legislators and "most were opposed" was the sentiment. We'll keep that pressure up if the new version looks like garbage. Stay tuned... [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Lycanthrope
32 minutes ago
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 9:33 AM
R
Seekins rifles
Latest: Ruttin
Today at 9:11 AM
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 9:04 AM
Cheaper Lithium for FFS shuttl
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 8:52 AM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: Allen
Today at 8:34 AM
L
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: LBrandt
Today at 2:37 AM
C
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: camper
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
Wood Planer?
Latest: risingsun
Yesterday at 1:51 PM
N
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: NodakBob
Yesterday at 9:35 AM
Tire inflator
Latest: ndfinfan
Yesterday at 7:18 AM
F 150 Owners
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 5:55 AM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Rut2much
Saturday at 10:21 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 7:16 AM
Eat steak wear real fur
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 6:54 AM
P
Anyone see that one coming
Latest: PrairieGhost
Saturday at 6:42 AM
Rods From god YT
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 1:36 AM
N
Heated jackets
Latest: ndrivrrat
Friday at 5:07 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Davy Crockett
Friday at 3:58 PM
B
Ice fishing Sak
Latest: Bcblazek
Friday at 3:05 PM
Packers
Latest: Allen
Thursday at 11:43 PM
Montana Snowpack
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:45 PM
Bud Heavy
Latest: Zogman
Thursday at 8:20 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
No Trespass Law
Top
Bottom