What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
No Trespass Law
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="njsimonson" data-source="post: 246637" data-attributes="member: 1507"><p>You're all correct...this alleged compromise has not been released (yet), but the proponents of SB 2315 had no issue hyping it up last week, despite having NO IDEA what's in it, beyond some napkin scribbles after Erbele came back hat-in-hand to the committee looking for any sort of win for his big money buddies. My fear is the electronic proposal touted by them will add a layer of complexity, confusion, will frustrate landowner efforts to effectively post their land, and cause further unintended trespass and ultimately, will not prevent poachers and trespassers from breaking the law, while hurting hunter access and the G&F's bottom line. But...I haven't seen the bill yet. Keep pushing NO on SB 2315. </p><p></p><p>I'd be more in favor of the alleged electronic "compromise" system if: 1) all land started out as unposted; 2) land could be electronically posted and unposted on a weekly basis (ie: post for deer gun season, but open for late-season pheasant); 3) it was easy to manage for the IT group it is assigned to 4) it didn't cost a ton of money that was put on sportsmen; 5) the GIS program was available in phone and chip format (with periodic updates) and, probably most importantly 6) we had two more years to figure it all out and get it right, instead of it being just slopped together in some out-of-public-sight hoghouse bill which I fully anticipate will happen. The latter is the biggest concern. </p><p></p><p>Rumor had it the vote count was Nay 30, Yay 17 or so with a couple up in the air on the original SB 2315, thanks in great part to the people here and elsewhere hammering legislators on the topic. Statements such as "I've received 10 emails for SB 2315 for every 1 for any other bill" were frequent from legislators and "most were opposed" was the sentiment. We'll keep that pressure up if the new version looks like garbage. Stay tuned...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="njsimonson, post: 246637, member: 1507"] You're all correct...this alleged compromise has not been released (yet), but the proponents of SB 2315 had no issue hyping it up last week, despite having NO IDEA what's in it, beyond some napkin scribbles after Erbele came back hat-in-hand to the committee looking for any sort of win for his big money buddies. My fear is the electronic proposal touted by them will add a layer of complexity, confusion, will frustrate landowner efforts to effectively post their land, and cause further unintended trespass and ultimately, will not prevent poachers and trespassers from breaking the law, while hurting hunter access and the G&F's bottom line. But...I haven't seen the bill yet. Keep pushing NO on SB 2315. I'd be more in favor of the alleged electronic "compromise" system if: 1) all land started out as unposted; 2) land could be electronically posted and unposted on a weekly basis (ie: post for deer gun season, but open for late-season pheasant); 3) it was easy to manage for the IT group it is assigned to 4) it didn't cost a ton of money that was put on sportsmen; 5) the GIS program was available in phone and chip format (with periodic updates) and, probably most importantly 6) we had two more years to figure it all out and get it right, instead of it being just slopped together in some out-of-public-sight hoghouse bill which I fully anticipate will happen. The latter is the biggest concern. Rumor had it the vote count was Nay 30, Yay 17 or so with a couple up in the air on the original SB 2315, thanks in great part to the people here and elsewhere hammering legislators on the topic. Statements such as "I've received 10 emails for SB 2315 for every 1 for any other bill" were frequent from legislators and "most were opposed" was the sentiment. We'll keep that pressure up if the new version looks like garbage. Stay tuned... [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Spring has sprung-
Latest: bucksnbears
A moment ago
F
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: fly2cast
9 minutes ago
ND bighorn sheep lottery
Latest: johnr
35 minutes ago
P
Fargo PD
Latest: Pheasant 54
45 minutes ago
Little heart well pipe.
Latest: Achucker
Today at 1:04 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: SupressYourself
Today at 12:41 PM
G
Sale
Remington 788 222
Latest: Griz
Today at 12:17 PM
Oahe 26
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 10:58 AM
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: bucksnbears
Today at 7:31 AM
Gm
Latest: NDSportsman
Today at 7:20 AM
Accuracy Oil YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 7:49 PM
M
Contemplating a shop build
Latest: Mike Fretty
Yesterday at 5:43 PM
POS
Latest: guywhofishes
Yesterday at 5:43 PM
S
2007 Yukon headrest
Latest: scrotcaster
Yesterday at 3:13 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Big Iron
Yesterday at 10:18 AM
S
Morels
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 9:02 AM
S
Retardation (turkey shells) YT
Latest: snow2
Tuesday at 8:41 PM
Ice Fishing
Latest: bowcarp
Tuesday at 5:59 PM
Boat carpet
Latest: Slappy
Tuesday at 5:44 PM
Sucker Minnows
Latest: Lycanthrope
Tuesday at 11:15 AM
Tea/Laxative?! YT
Latest: svnmag
Monday at 9:27 PM
Training for the outdoors
Latest: risingsun
Monday at 6:10 PM
N
Tritoon on a pontoon trailer?
Latest: NodakBob
Monday at 3:48 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
No Trespass Law
Top
Bottom