What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
No Trespass Law
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="njsimonson" data-source="post: 246637" data-attributes="member: 1507"><p>You're all correct...this alleged compromise has not been released (yet), but the proponents of SB 2315 had no issue hyping it up last week, despite having NO IDEA what's in it, beyond some napkin scribbles after Erbele came back hat-in-hand to the committee looking for any sort of win for his big money buddies. My fear is the electronic proposal touted by them will add a layer of complexity, confusion, will frustrate landowner efforts to effectively post their land, and cause further unintended trespass and ultimately, will not prevent poachers and trespassers from breaking the law, while hurting hunter access and the G&F's bottom line. But...I haven't seen the bill yet. Keep pushing NO on SB 2315. </p><p></p><p>I'd be more in favor of the alleged electronic "compromise" system if: 1) all land started out as unposted; 2) land could be electronically posted and unposted on a weekly basis (ie: post for deer gun season, but open for late-season pheasant); 3) it was easy to manage for the IT group it is assigned to 4) it didn't cost a ton of money that was put on sportsmen; 5) the GIS program was available in phone and chip format (with periodic updates) and, probably most importantly 6) we had two more years to figure it all out and get it right, instead of it being just slopped together in some out-of-public-sight hoghouse bill which I fully anticipate will happen. The latter is the biggest concern. </p><p></p><p>Rumor had it the vote count was Nay 30, Yay 17 or so with a couple up in the air on the original SB 2315, thanks in great part to the people here and elsewhere hammering legislators on the topic. Statements such as "I've received 10 emails for SB 2315 for every 1 for any other bill" were frequent from legislators and "most were opposed" was the sentiment. We'll keep that pressure up if the new version looks like garbage. Stay tuned...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="njsimonson, post: 246637, member: 1507"] You're all correct...this alleged compromise has not been released (yet), but the proponents of SB 2315 had no issue hyping it up last week, despite having NO IDEA what's in it, beyond some napkin scribbles after Erbele came back hat-in-hand to the committee looking for any sort of win for his big money buddies. My fear is the electronic proposal touted by them will add a layer of complexity, confusion, will frustrate landowner efforts to effectively post their land, and cause further unintended trespass and ultimately, will not prevent poachers and trespassers from breaking the law, while hurting hunter access and the G&F's bottom line. But...I haven't seen the bill yet. Keep pushing NO on SB 2315. I'd be more in favor of the alleged electronic "compromise" system if: 1) all land started out as unposted; 2) land could be electronically posted and unposted on a weekly basis (ie: post for deer gun season, but open for late-season pheasant); 3) it was easy to manage for the IT group it is assigned to 4) it didn't cost a ton of money that was put on sportsmen; 5) the GIS program was available in phone and chip format (with periodic updates) and, probably most importantly 6) we had two more years to figure it all out and get it right, instead of it being just slopped together in some out-of-public-sight hoghouse bill which I fully anticipate will happen. The latter is the biggest concern. Rumor had it the vote count was Nay 30, Yay 17 or so with a couple up in the air on the original SB 2315, thanks in great part to the people here and elsewhere hammering legislators on the topic. Statements such as "I've received 10 emails for SB 2315 for every 1 for any other bill" were frequent from legislators and "most were opposed" was the sentiment. We'll keep that pressure up if the new version looks like garbage. Stay tuned... [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Tammy Miller
Latest: Wally World
1 minute ago
7
Tailrace trout
Latest: 77Talladega
21 minutes ago
F
What boat ramp open in Bismark
Latest: Fester
55 minutes ago
T
Kristi Noem Dog Killer
Latest: Twitch
57 minutes ago
F
Representative Dockter
Latest: Fester
58 minutes ago
Wild Turkey
Latest: svnmag
Today at 9:26 PM
No Mow May
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 6:29 PM
Sale
Marlin 30TK
Latest: Zogman
Today at 3:35 PM
Sale
Elec Power Washer
Latest: Zogman
Today at 1:46 PM
Best facebook page ever .
Latest: Davey Crockett
Today at 12:45 PM
Skinwalker Ranch
Latest: BrokenBackJack
Today at 11:28 AM
T
Wicked Waters Taxidermy
Latest: Traxion
Today at 11:19 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 10:41 AM
Electric Vehicles
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:07 PM
R
Sak
Sak - New Town Area 5/4
Latest: Retired 2
Yesterday at 8:31 PM
N
Smoke Bombs for pest control
Latest: ndrivrrat
Yesterday at 6:03 PM
F
Western Dakota Honor Flight
Latest: Fester
Yesterday at 4:46 PM
Any Birders here?
Latest: 1bigfokker
Yesterday at 2:04 PM
S
Tow Truck Driver Sentenced
Latest: scrotcaster
Yesterday at 10:09 AM
RR
Red River 5-8-24
Latest: Captainbrad
Yesterday at 8:27 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
No Trespass Law
Top
Bottom