What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
North Dakota Game Wardens Assc
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Allen" data-source="post: 195103" data-attributes="member: 389"><p>In theory, no. I don't think this rule which went in place around 2003 (??) was to put older mounts in jeopardy. At this point though, I put nothing past a LEO with a mission and a dumbass rule.</p><p></p><p>You hear about a set of antlers getting confiscated just about every year though at big buck contests, etc. People shoot deer, get worried the sticky tag will damage the aesthetics of the rack and remove tag prematurely. Badda bing, bada boom. It walks out the door with a new owner and a stern warning to the original owner. </p><p></p><p>I remember when the rule went into affect I was assured that they weren't going to use it as a tool to take away older mounts, but as far as I know there's never been anything codified that would prevent a warden from walking into any of our homes and confiscating mounts that are 20 years old. Seriously, how the hell would you prove it pre-dated the rule coming into effect? A dated picture from the 80s?</p><p></p><p>Without a pic of said deer with a date stamp, they can claim it's more modern and just take it.</p><p></p><p>And yes, I am damn sure if you email NDGF they'll tell you they have no interest in confiscating your deer, but if a warden were to visit your taxidermist and see the rack just laying around without a tag he or she is going to have some questions!</p><p></p><p>I don't like being subjected to someone else's subjective call. </p><p></p><p>zogman, if I were in your shoes this is something I would bring up with your taxidermist. He should know if there is a need for any documentation on something like an older mount that is being redone. And of course, NDGF would also be willing to clarify their current position as I haven't talked with anyone over there about this since the rule first came about and that's now been quite a few years. I take and put the original tag for the deer on the back of the mount using clear packing tape.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Allen, post: 195103, member: 389"] In theory, no. I don't think this rule which went in place around 2003 (??) was to put older mounts in jeopardy. At this point though, I put nothing past a LEO with a mission and a dumbass rule. You hear about a set of antlers getting confiscated just about every year though at big buck contests, etc. People shoot deer, get worried the sticky tag will damage the aesthetics of the rack and remove tag prematurely. Badda bing, bada boom. It walks out the door with a new owner and a stern warning to the original owner. I remember when the rule went into affect I was assured that they weren't going to use it as a tool to take away older mounts, but as far as I know there's never been anything codified that would prevent a warden from walking into any of our homes and confiscating mounts that are 20 years old. Seriously, how the hell would you prove it pre-dated the rule coming into effect? A dated picture from the 80s? Without a pic of said deer with a date stamp, they can claim it's more modern and just take it. And yes, I am damn sure if you email NDGF they'll tell you they have no interest in confiscating your deer, but if a warden were to visit your taxidermist and see the rack just laying around without a tag he or she is going to have some questions! I don't like being subjected to someone else's subjective call. zogman, if I were in your shoes this is something I would bring up with your taxidermist. He should know if there is a need for any documentation on something like an older mount that is being redone. And of course, NDGF would also be willing to clarify their current position as I haven't talked with anyone over there about this since the rule first came about and that's now been quite a few years. I take and put the original tag for the deer on the back of the mount using clear packing tape. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rowdie
2 minutes ago
MN Wolves
Latest: SDMF
4 minutes ago
T
Outdoor photo request
Latest: Trapper62
32 minutes ago
MN walleye possession Limits
Latest: Rowdie
43 minutes ago
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 6:04 AM
Squirrel trapping?
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 9:58 PM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 9:23 PM
StrikeMaster Maven-40v
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 8:40 PM
R
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: riverview
Yesterday at 8:19 PM
Remote camera options
Latest: Wirehair
Yesterday at 7:43 PM
Batten down the hatches!
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 6:48 PM
Property Tax Credit
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 6:26 PM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 1:05 PM
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 7:11 AM
Satellite Internet
Latest: grantfurness
Wednesday at 10:11 PM
R
Any ice reports?
Latest: riverview
Wednesday at 9:25 PM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Jiffy
Wednesday at 7:57 PM
Alkaline lake ice conditions?
Latest: NDSportsman
Wednesday at 2:55 PM
N
ION gen2 8"
Latest: ndrivrrat
Tuesday at 5:43 PM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:51 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:43 PM
Wolves at J Clark Sawyer
Latest: Davy Crockett
Tuesday at 11:08 AM
W
Which one you did this?
Latest: walleyeman_1875
Monday at 12:17 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
North Dakota Game Wardens Assc
Top
Bottom