What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
North Dakota Game Wardens Assc
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Allen" data-source="post: 195103" data-attributes="member: 389"><p>In theory, no. I don't think this rule which went in place around 2003 (??) was to put older mounts in jeopardy. At this point though, I put nothing past a LEO with a mission and a dumbass rule.</p><p></p><p>You hear about a set of antlers getting confiscated just about every year though at big buck contests, etc. People shoot deer, get worried the sticky tag will damage the aesthetics of the rack and remove tag prematurely. Badda bing, bada boom. It walks out the door with a new owner and a stern warning to the original owner. </p><p></p><p>I remember when the rule went into affect I was assured that they weren't going to use it as a tool to take away older mounts, but as far as I know there's never been anything codified that would prevent a warden from walking into any of our homes and confiscating mounts that are 20 years old. Seriously, how the hell would you prove it pre-dated the rule coming into effect? A dated picture from the 80s?</p><p></p><p>Without a pic of said deer with a date stamp, they can claim it's more modern and just take it.</p><p></p><p>And yes, I am damn sure if you email NDGF they'll tell you they have no interest in confiscating your deer, but if a warden were to visit your taxidermist and see the rack just laying around without a tag he or she is going to have some questions!</p><p></p><p>I don't like being subjected to someone else's subjective call. </p><p></p><p>zogman, if I were in your shoes this is something I would bring up with your taxidermist. He should know if there is a need for any documentation on something like an older mount that is being redone. And of course, NDGF would also be willing to clarify their current position as I haven't talked with anyone over there about this since the rule first came about and that's now been quite a few years. I take and put the original tag for the deer on the back of the mount using clear packing tape.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Allen, post: 195103, member: 389"] In theory, no. I don't think this rule which went in place around 2003 (??) was to put older mounts in jeopardy. At this point though, I put nothing past a LEO with a mission and a dumbass rule. You hear about a set of antlers getting confiscated just about every year though at big buck contests, etc. People shoot deer, get worried the sticky tag will damage the aesthetics of the rack and remove tag prematurely. Badda bing, bada boom. It walks out the door with a new owner and a stern warning to the original owner. I remember when the rule went into affect I was assured that they weren't going to use it as a tool to take away older mounts, but as far as I know there's never been anything codified that would prevent a warden from walking into any of our homes and confiscating mounts that are 20 years old. Seriously, how the hell would you prove it pre-dated the rule coming into effect? A dated picture from the 80s? Without a pic of said deer with a date stamp, they can claim it's more modern and just take it. And yes, I am damn sure if you email NDGF they'll tell you they have no interest in confiscating your deer, but if a warden were to visit your taxidermist and see the rack just laying around without a tag he or she is going to have some questions! I don't like being subjected to someone else's subjective call. zogman, if I were in your shoes this is something I would bring up with your taxidermist. He should know if there is a need for any documentation on something like an older mount that is being redone. And of course, NDGF would also be willing to clarify their current position as I haven't talked with anyone over there about this since the rule first came about and that's now been quite a few years. I take and put the original tag for the deer on the back of the mount using clear packing tape. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Food porn
Latest: SurvivalAmazon88
6 minutes ago
Spring has sprung-
Latest: SurvivalAmazon88
12 minutes ago
ND bighorn sheep lottery
Latest: risingsun
51 minutes ago
Little heart well pipe.
Latest: Allen
Today at 10:59 AM
Plum Creek Canines
Latest: KDM
Today at 9:33 AM
Morels
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:43 PM
Fargo PD
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 6:16 PM
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: Sluggo
Yesterday at 5:42 PM
J
Burleigh co. Ditches debate
Latest: Johnny Five
Yesterday at 3:18 PM
G
POS
Latest: Grizzly Adams
Yesterday at 1:54 PM
Twins
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 10:01 AM
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 8:46 AM
Sale
Remington 788 222
Latest: shorthairsrus
Yesterday at 7:31 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 11:27 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Rowdie
Thursday at 9:04 PM
Oahe 26
Latest: Jiffy
Thursday at 10:58 AM
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: bucksnbears
Thursday at 7:31 AM
Gm
Latest: NDSportsman
Thursday at 7:20 AM
Accuracy Oil YT
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 7:49 PM
M
Contemplating a shop build
Latest: Mike Fretty
Wednesday at 5:43 PM
S
2007 Yukon headrest
Latest: scrotcaster
Wednesday at 3:13 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Big Iron
Wednesday at 10:18 AM
S
Retardation (turkey shells) YT
Latest: snow2
Tuesday at 8:41 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
North Dakota Game Wardens Assc
Top
Bottom