What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
North Dakota Game Wardens Assc
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 195134" data-attributes="member: 373"><p>It seems people that are concerned if it was a buck or a doe, or think that this particular instance the hangmans noose should be tightened perhaps have forgotten what hunting is about. </p><p></p><p>To me I care less whether party hunting is allowed or not, It was merely an example offered that showed sometimes laws are not one size fits all and often times such as the caliber and tag with the mount merely a way to tighten the screws. </p><p></p><p>I was in Bowbells at the advisory meeting the year Hildenbrand announced this new law went into effect requiring tags to be on deer forever. </p><p>I asked how they would determine 5 years down the road what deer had been shot before the law and that people would be assumed guilty would be required to prove our innocence as a result of this law. He claimed to everyone there it was not intended to be used in that manner. I asked why have the law then. </p><p></p><p>That winter at an archery shop I walked in as the warden was telling the fella that owned it he would have to provide documentation of some sort as to when the deer on his wall were shot..........</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Could you show where I said the law should be changed?? We are talking about implementing laws (caliber limitations, ect) that have flaws with in them that often the G&F care little about. </p><p></p><p>Can you show where I assumed it gave me the "right" to shoot two bucks or that they were even bucks? </p><p></p><p>Would you be alright with it if they were two does?</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>For those claiming it is the law, what is the difference if it is a goose or a deer? </p><p></p><p>Antlers seem to make people a bit crazy.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>there are laws making it illegal so why is breaking those any different?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gst, post: 195134, member: 373"] It seems people that are concerned if it was a buck or a doe, or think that this particular instance the hangmans noose should be tightened perhaps have forgotten what hunting is about. To me I care less whether party hunting is allowed or not, It was merely an example offered that showed sometimes laws are not one size fits all and often times such as the caliber and tag with the mount merely a way to tighten the screws. I was in Bowbells at the advisory meeting the year Hildenbrand announced this new law went into effect requiring tags to be on deer forever. I asked how they would determine 5 years down the road what deer had been shot before the law and that people would be assumed guilty would be required to prove our innocence as a result of this law. He claimed to everyone there it was not intended to be used in that manner. I asked why have the law then. That winter at an archery shop I walked in as the warden was telling the fella that owned it he would have to provide documentation of some sort as to when the deer on his wall were shot.......... [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] Could you show where I said the law should be changed?? We are talking about implementing laws (caliber limitations, ect) that have flaws with in them that often the G&F care little about. Can you show where I assumed it gave me the "right" to shoot two bucks or that they were even bucks? Would you be alright with it if they were two does? [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] For those claiming it is the law, what is the difference if it is a goose or a deer? Antlers seem to make people a bit crazy. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] there are laws making it illegal so why is breaking those any different? [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
H
MN walleye possession Limits
Latest: Hunter58301
5 minutes ago
T
24 volt Strikemaster power hea
Latest: Traxion
36 minutes ago
S
StrikeMaster Maven-40v
Latest: Silver
Today at 5:04 PM
R
Outdoor photo request
Latest: riverview
Today at 3:35 PM
S
Property Tax Credit
Latest: snow2
Today at 2:10 PM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 11:10 AM
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: SDMF
Today at 9:59 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 8:47 AM
MN Wolves
Latest: SDMF
Today at 8:44 AM
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 6:04 AM
Squirrel trapping?
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 9:58 PM
R
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: riverview
Yesterday at 8:19 PM
Remote camera options
Latest: Wirehair
Yesterday at 7:43 PM
Batten down the hatches!
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 6:48 PM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 1:05 PM
Satellite Internet
Latest: grantfurness
Wednesday at 10:11 PM
R
Any ice reports?
Latest: riverview
Wednesday at 9:25 PM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Jiffy
Wednesday at 7:57 PM
Alkaline lake ice conditions?
Latest: NDSportsman
Wednesday at 2:55 PM
N
ION gen2 8"
Latest: ndrivrrat
Tuesday at 5:43 PM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:51 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:43 PM
Wolves at J Clark Sawyer
Latest: Davy Crockett
Tuesday at 11:08 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
North Dakota Game Wardens Assc
Top
Bottom