What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Phone apps 101
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Davy Crockett" data-source="post: 300695" data-attributes="member: 367"><p>I hope your right. I just feel like the whole plan doesn't pass the smell test. Not to mention they are discussing the use of stimulus money </p><p> to fire up 6000 more wells when we are in the biggest oil glut of all time and drive oil prices into the ground again. </p><p> My main gripe I guess is that this is emergency money and most of these wells have been idle for 30-40 years yet in the last 3 months we have watched small mom and pops main street businesses fall on the brink of bankruptcy. </p><p> Then there is this.</p><p></p><p> "Although no formal proposal has been submitted, the governor and other state officials also have discussed using some of the federal coronavirus aid to restart the mores than 6,000 oil wells that have been idled but not abandoned in recent weeks due to low prices. State and industry officials said it could $50,000 to $400,000 to bring a well back online and production."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> <a href="https://apnews.com/0c7ed45aca2daa707d7fcea8fbefb737" target="_blank">https://apnews.com/0c7ed45aca2daa707d7fcea8fbefb737</a></p><p></p><p></p><p> I'd probably be on board if they downsized the plan and awarded the contracts to smaller local contractors and local ready mix companies like we used to back in the day. Maybe they will but from what I can see the only way to this many wells in a few months will require Halliburton and Schlumberger or whatever global contractors in operation out there to bring crews from out of state to gobble up as much as they can. Another problem is that the state doesn't have the personal to monitor this big of a project in the timeframe they want to do it in so corners will be cut . Just my 2 cents worth , Maybe I am way off base. </p><p></p><p></p><p> "State and industry officials said it could $50,000 to $400,000 to bring a well back online and production." This claim really throws a red flag in my mind.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p>https://bismarcktribune.com/bakken/abandoned-oil-well-plugging-to-begin-mid-july-regulators-ok-ethanol-grant/article_a10deac8-9d45-5d1a-b98f-29a4810756f1.html#tracking-source=home-top-story-1</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> Most of this work in in my neck of the woods and shallow wells lots of them are under 4000' I should be doing jumping jacks but We have enough small independent contractors and crews in this area to complete this project on a smaller scale so the State hands can keep up. I realize a lot has changed but I've saw a lot of shady plug jobs in my life when the state hand wasn't around. There's a lot of profit in charging for cement that doesn't ever get pumped down the hole. </p><p> I see the amount jumped from $33.1 million to $ 66 million and the bidding starts tomorrow so we won't have to wait long to find out. That was quick</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Davy Crockett, post: 300695, member: 367"] I hope your right. I just feel like the whole plan doesn't pass the smell test. Not to mention they are discussing the use of stimulus money to fire up 6000 more wells when we are in the biggest oil glut of all time and drive oil prices into the ground again. My main gripe I guess is that this is emergency money and most of these wells have been idle for 30-40 years yet in the last 3 months we have watched small mom and pops main street businesses fall on the brink of bankruptcy. Then there is this. "Although no formal proposal has been submitted, the governor and other state officials also have discussed using some of the federal coronavirus aid to restart the mores than 6,000 oil wells that have been idled but not abandoned in recent weeks due to low prices. State and industry officials said it could $50,000 to $400,000 to bring a well back online and production." [url]https://apnews.com/0c7ed45aca2daa707d7fcea8fbefb737[/url] I'd probably be on board if they downsized the plan and awarded the contracts to smaller local contractors and local ready mix companies like we used to back in the day. Maybe they will but from what I can see the only way to this many wells in a few months will require Halliburton and Schlumberger or whatever global contractors in operation out there to bring crews from out of state to gobble up as much as they can. Another problem is that the state doesn't have the personal to monitor this big of a project in the timeframe they want to do it in so corners will be cut . Just my 2 cents worth , Maybe I am way off base. "State and industry officials said it could $50,000 to $400,000 to bring a well back online and production." This claim really throws a red flag in my mind. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] https://bismarcktribune.com/bakken/abandoned-oil-well-plugging-to-begin-mid-july-regulators-ok-ethanol-grant/article_a10deac8-9d45-5d1a-b98f-29a4810756f1.html#tracking-source=home-top-story-1 Most of this work in in my neck of the woods and shallow wells lots of them are under 4000' I should be doing jumping jacks but We have enough small independent contractors and crews in this area to complete this project on a smaller scale so the State hands can keep up. I realize a lot has changed but I've saw a lot of shady plug jobs in my life when the state hand wasn't around. There's a lot of profit in charging for cement that doesn't ever get pumped down the hole. I see the amount jumped from $33.1 million to $ 66 million and the bidding starts tomorrow so we won't have to wait long to find out. That was quick [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Rowdie
21 minutes ago
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Jiffy
29 minutes ago
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Today at 4:38 PM
Property Tax Credit
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 2:59 PM
Alkaline lake ice conditions?
Latest: NDSportsman
Today at 2:55 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 2:54 PM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Walleye Slayer
Today at 10:09 AM
Any ice reports?
Latest: wslayer
Today at 8:50 AM
N
ION gen2 8"
Latest: ndrivrrat
Yesterday at 5:43 PM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 4:51 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 4:43 PM
Wolves at J Clark Sawyer
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 11:08 AM
Outdoor photo request
Latest: JMF
Yesterday at 5:46 AM
W
Which one you did this?
Latest: walleyeman_1875
Monday at 12:17 PM
S
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: snow2
Sunday at 9:46 AM
Deer speeds.
Latest: Kurtr
Sunday at 9:08 AM
6.5 Creedmore
Latest: Jiffy
Sunday at 8:25 AM
N
Crazy Fingers
Latest: NodakBob
Saturday at 2:39 PM
It's been a good season.
Latest: grumster
Friday at 9:00 PM
Montana to cut deer tags
Latest: Kurtr
Friday at 2:03 PM
S
Satellite Internet
Latest: sdietrich
Thursday at 10:34 PM
T
Let's talk EBIKES!!!
Latest: Traxion
Thursday at 8:56 PM
L
Hard decision -Dog
Latest: LBrandt
Thursday at 5:29 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Phone apps 101
Top
Bottom