What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Piping Mississippi River water west
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Allen" data-source="post: 345495" data-attributes="member: 389"><p>Polar ice caps, Greenland, receding glaciers, etc.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Personally, I'd like to keep the Californiacators west of Vegas, at a minimum.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm pretty sure it won't be a private entity. No way they could navigate/fund the environmental studies this would require, much less fund the construction of something that would involve eminent domain of so much land. Nah, this would be a Corps of Engineers, or Bureau of Reclamation style project. Most likely a Reclamation project with a Corps permit since Reclamation owns the dams on the Colorado River into which the water would go and the Corps mostly manages the Mississippi. </p><p></p><p>As far as the Great Lakes pact, that is simply a pact between the states to oppose any project that were to divert Great Lakes water out of the Great Lakes watershed. It doesn't have the weight of federal law, which is what would be required to divert water from the Mississippi to the Colorado.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Mehh, we do it all the time. Minnetucky moves water around quite a bit in between different watersheds. There's a Milk River diversion that takes water from the Missouri watershed into the Hudson's Bay watershed. All kinds of water diversions exist in this country. When you really think about it, water is just another resource/commodity. Why we think it's any different than oil, coal, iron, copper, wheat, or cars escapes my logic. We are irrationally attached to water because it has multiple uses (drinking, beer making, fishing, etc), but at the end of the day...water moves in the direction of money.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Allen, post: 345495, member: 389"] Polar ice caps, Greenland, receding glaciers, etc. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] Personally, I'd like to keep the Californiacators west of Vegas, at a minimum. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] I'm pretty sure it won't be a private entity. No way they could navigate/fund the environmental studies this would require, much less fund the construction of something that would involve eminent domain of so much land. Nah, this would be a Corps of Engineers, or Bureau of Reclamation style project. Most likely a Reclamation project with a Corps permit since Reclamation owns the dams on the Colorado River into which the water would go and the Corps mostly manages the Mississippi. As far as the Great Lakes pact, that is simply a pact between the states to oppose any project that were to divert Great Lakes water out of the Great Lakes watershed. It doesn't have the weight of federal law, which is what would be required to divert water from the Mississippi to the Colorado. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] Mehh, we do it all the time. Minnetucky moves water around quite a bit in between different watersheds. There's a Milk River diversion that takes water from the Missouri watershed into the Hudson's Bay watershed. All kinds of water diversions exist in this country. When you really think about it, water is just another resource/commodity. Why we think it's any different than oil, coal, iron, copper, wheat, or cars escapes my logic. We are irrationally attached to water because it has multiple uses (drinking, beer making, fishing, etc), but at the end of the day...water moves in the direction of money. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
K
Wood Planer?
Latest: Katiejo
14 minutes ago
N
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: NodakBob
Today at 9:35 AM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 8:20 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rut2much
Today at 7:48 AM
Tire inflator
Latest: ndfinfan
Today at 7:18 AM
F 150 Owners
Latest: 1lessdog
Today at 5:55 AM
M
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Migrator Man
Yesterday at 9:30 PM
X
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: xFishSlayerx
Yesterday at 6:43 PM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Rut2much
Yesterday at 10:21 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 7:16 AM
Eat steak wear real fur
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 6:54 AM
P
Anyone see that one coming
Latest: PrairieGhost
Yesterday at 6:42 AM
Rods From god YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 1:36 AM
N
Heated jackets
Latest: ndrivrrat
Friday at 5:07 PM
Seekins rifles
Latest: lunkerslayer
Friday at 4:54 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Davy Crockett
Friday at 3:58 PM
B
Ice fishing Sak
Latest: Bcblazek
Friday at 3:05 PM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: ktm450
Friday at 8:37 AM
Packers
Latest: Allen
Thursday at 11:43 PM
Montana Snowpack
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:45 PM
Bud Heavy
Latest: Zogman
Thursday at 8:20 AM
Oops
Latest: NDSportsman
Thursday at 6:09 AM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SDMF
Wednesday at 10:33 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Piping Mississippi River water west
Top
Bottom