What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Piping Mississippi River water west
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Allen" data-source="post: 345495" data-attributes="member: 389"><p>Polar ice caps, Greenland, receding glaciers, etc.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Personally, I'd like to keep the Californiacators west of Vegas, at a minimum.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm pretty sure it won't be a private entity. No way they could navigate/fund the environmental studies this would require, much less fund the construction of something that would involve eminent domain of so much land. Nah, this would be a Corps of Engineers, or Bureau of Reclamation style project. Most likely a Reclamation project with a Corps permit since Reclamation owns the dams on the Colorado River into which the water would go and the Corps mostly manages the Mississippi. </p><p></p><p>As far as the Great Lakes pact, that is simply a pact between the states to oppose any project that were to divert Great Lakes water out of the Great Lakes watershed. It doesn't have the weight of federal law, which is what would be required to divert water from the Mississippi to the Colorado.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Mehh, we do it all the time. Minnetucky moves water around quite a bit in between different watersheds. There's a Milk River diversion that takes water from the Missouri watershed into the Hudson's Bay watershed. All kinds of water diversions exist in this country. When you really think about it, water is just another resource/commodity. Why we think it's any different than oil, coal, iron, copper, wheat, or cars escapes my logic. We are irrationally attached to water because it has multiple uses (drinking, beer making, fishing, etc), but at the end of the day...water moves in the direction of money.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Allen, post: 345495, member: 389"] Polar ice caps, Greenland, receding glaciers, etc. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] Personally, I'd like to keep the Californiacators west of Vegas, at a minimum. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] I'm pretty sure it won't be a private entity. No way they could navigate/fund the environmental studies this would require, much less fund the construction of something that would involve eminent domain of so much land. Nah, this would be a Corps of Engineers, or Bureau of Reclamation style project. Most likely a Reclamation project with a Corps permit since Reclamation owns the dams on the Colorado River into which the water would go and the Corps mostly manages the Mississippi. As far as the Great Lakes pact, that is simply a pact between the states to oppose any project that were to divert Great Lakes water out of the Great Lakes watershed. It doesn't have the weight of federal law, which is what would be required to divert water from the Mississippi to the Colorado. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] Mehh, we do it all the time. Minnetucky moves water around quite a bit in between different watersheds. There's a Milk River diversion that takes water from the Missouri watershed into the Hudson's Bay watershed. All kinds of water diversions exist in this country. When you really think about it, water is just another resource/commodity. Why we think it's any different than oil, coal, iron, copper, wheat, or cars escapes my logic. We are irrationally attached to water because it has multiple uses (drinking, beer making, fishing, etc), but at the end of the day...water moves in the direction of money. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Today at 1:39 AM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 10:47 PM
Tea/Laxative?! YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:27 PM
Boat carpet
Latest: Rut2much
Yesterday at 8:44 PM
ND bighorn sheep lottery
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 8:37 PM
Spring has sprung-
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 7:06 PM
Sucker Minnows
Latest: KDM
Yesterday at 7:05 PM
Training for the outdoors
Latest: risingsun
Yesterday at 6:10 PM
N
Tritoon on a pontoon trailer?
Latest: NodakBob
Yesterday at 3:48 PM
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 3:16 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: guywhofishes
Yesterday at 1:21 PM
K
Fishing in Valley City
Latest: kyle12bravo
Yesterday at 1:00 PM
Yellowstone
Latest: tikkalover
Yesterday at 11:40 AM
Reloader 26 For Sale
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 7:09 AM
Auroras from last night
Latest: 5575
Sunday at 11:04 PM
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: Allen
Sunday at 10:41 PM
A-10 2026 YT
Latest: svnmag
Sunday at 8:57 PM
W
Burleigh co. Ditches debate
Latest: woodduck30
Sunday at 7:47 PM
L
Chuck Norris~
Latest: LBrandt
Sunday at 6:13 PM
I finally won a gun
Latest: cooter00
Sunday at 3:26 PM
Taylor Sheridan
Latest: Vollmer
Sunday at 10:05 AM
YT Divorce Eggs
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 9:15 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Saturday at 7:33 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Piping Mississippi River water west
Top
Bottom