Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CatDaddy" data-source="post: 420290" data-attributes="member: 755">I don't need creativity and imagination in the statements I made.&nbsp; They're simply born from Covid-era science and the &quot;oodles of research&quot; that was thrown at us.&nbsp; Some members of the &quot;scientific&quot; and political communities were motivated by bad intentions, others were trying to do God's work.&nbsp; In the end, &quot;trust science&quot; isn't enough for me because not all science is trustworthy.&nbsp; I won't blindly believe because someone named Brock or Joe or with the title Dr. tells me &quot;it's the science&quot;.&nbsp; We all know how Covid turned out - greed, control, and politics veiled much of the true science that was going on.&quot;Oodles of research&quot; includes both bad and good research.&nbsp; Even with good research, poor correlations and conclusions can be drawn.&nbsp; From those poor correlations and conclusions, damaging containment and countermeasures can be put in place.&nbsp; My comment was &quot;trust the science&quot; is a red flag for me because it insinuates that all research is created equal.&nbsp; In order for me to decide where I stand I need the deeper details of the research, how it was conducted, data analysis methods, motivations of the researchers, etc.Not sure where you pull &quot;conspiracy theories&quot; from my OP to lump me in as a Dusty supporter.&nbsp; It's that type of crap that makes me wonder about your legitimacy and intent.&nbsp; If I don't blindly support your view or science, I must be &quot;one of them&quot;.&nbsp; Classy.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="CatDaddy, post: 420290, member: 755"] I don't need creativity and imagination in the statements I made. They're simply born from Covid-era science and the "oodles of research" that was thrown at us. Some members of the "scientific" and political communities were motivated by bad intentions, others were trying to do God's work. In the end, "trust science" isn't enough for me because not all science is trustworthy. I won't blindly believe because someone named Brock or Joe or with the title Dr. tells me "it's the science". We all know how Covid turned out - greed, control, and politics veiled much of the true science that was going on. "Oodles of research" includes both bad and good research. Even with good research, poor correlations and conclusions can be drawn. From those poor correlations and conclusions, damaging containment and countermeasures can be put in place. My comment was "trust the science" is a red flag for me because it insinuates that all research is created equal. In order for me to decide where I stand I need the deeper details of the research, how it was conducted, data analysis methods, motivations of the researchers, etc. Not sure where you pull "conspiracy theories" from my OP to lump me in as a Dusty supporter. It's that type of crap that makes me wonder about your legitimacy and intent. If I don't blindly support your view or science, I must be "one of them". Classy. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA