What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Polluting ND
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Davy Crockett" data-source="post: 469511" data-attributes="member: 367"><p>“They know it’s going to get permitted, and they know it’s going to be in a state that is open for business,” Bougalis said.</p><p></p><p>It took a whole whopping 24 hours to get project approval. WOW.</p><p> Nothing like approve first and ask questions and make rules later. </p><p></p><p>Based on the oilfield regulations in this state I'd bet the farm that the iron project will be welcomed with open arms and dreams of billions $$$$$$. Then, not if but WHEN times get tough, NAI will be gone and ND citizens will be left with the mess to clean up. </p><p></p><p> MINOT, you better get the horse in front of the cart on this and hire a good lawyer firm to draw up a binding contract because one shut down in Utah back in the 60s or 70s and was a huge eyesore and environmental mess in 2010 and it was still undergoing cleanup. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Cleanup timelines for a shutdown steel smelting location typically range from a few years to several decades, and sometimes longer. Complex sites with extensive contamination may require 30 years or more, especially if groundwater treatment is necessary. </p><p>The wide variation in time is due to several key factors that must be addressed during the remediation process.</p><p>Factors influencing the cleanup timeline</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Extent and type of contamination:</strong> Steel smelting and coking operations produce hazardous pollutants such as heavy metals (lead, mercury), asbestos, benzene, and cyanide. The concentration, type, and depth of these contaminants in the soil and groundwater are major drivers for the cleanup's scope and duration.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Contamination of groundwater:</strong> Addressing polluted groundwater is one of the most time-consuming aspects of site remediation. Extraction and treatment of contaminated water from an aquifer can take many years to complete.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Remediation method:</strong> The cleanup method selected significantly impacts the timeline.<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Excavation and removal:</strong> Physically digging up contaminated soil and hauling it to an approved disposal site is relatively fast, but it is also one of the most costly options.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Containment:</strong> Capping a site with clean soil, asphalt, or buildings can effectively contain heavy metals. This method avoids active removal but requires long-term monitoring, sometimes for 30 years or more.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Bioremediation:</strong> Using natural or enhanced biological processes to break down organic contaminants like petroleum products is often less disruptive and cheaper, but it can take longer to complete.</li> </ul></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Regulatory oversight:</strong> The involvement of regulatory bodies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) can influence the timeline, especially if the site is designated a Superfund site due to severe contamination. Regulatory reviews and multi-phase processes can extend the overall project length.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Planned reuse:</strong> The planned future use of the property affects the required cleanup standards and therefore the timeline.<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Industrial use:</strong> Leaving the land as an industrial site may allow for less aggressive cleanup, as the risk of human exposure is lower.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Residential use:</strong> Redeveloping the site for housing requires a much more thorough and protective cleanup due to the high risk of long-term exposure for residents, especially children.</li> </ul></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Facility size and number of structures:</strong> The physical footprint of the site and the number of buildings and foundations to demolish or treat affect the project's scale. Large former plants, like the Wisconsin Steel Works, have extensive grounds to clean up.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Financing and funding:</strong> Securing the necessary funding for cleanup can be a lengthy process. Many steel sites are brownfields, former industrial properties that require public-private partnerships or government funding for redevelopment. </li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Davy Crockett, post: 469511, member: 367"] “They know it’s going to get permitted, and they know it’s going to be in a state that is open for business,” Bougalis said. It took a whole whopping 24 hours to get project approval. WOW. Nothing like approve first and ask questions and make rules later. Based on the oilfield regulations in this state I'd bet the farm that the iron project will be welcomed with open arms and dreams of billions $$$$$$. Then, not if but WHEN times get tough, NAI will be gone and ND citizens will be left with the mess to clean up. MINOT, you better get the horse in front of the cart on this and hire a good lawyer firm to draw up a binding contract because one shut down in Utah back in the 60s or 70s and was a huge eyesore and environmental mess in 2010 and it was still undergoing cleanup. Cleanup timelines for a shutdown steel smelting location typically range from a few years to several decades, and sometimes longer. Complex sites with extensive contamination may require 30 years or more, especially if groundwater treatment is necessary. The wide variation in time is due to several key factors that must be addressed during the remediation process. Factors influencing the cleanup timeline [LIST] [*][B]Extent and type of contamination:[/B] Steel smelting and coking operations produce hazardous pollutants such as heavy metals (lead, mercury), asbestos, benzene, and cyanide. The concentration, type, and depth of these contaminants in the soil and groundwater are major drivers for the cleanup's scope and duration. [*][B]Contamination of groundwater:[/B] Addressing polluted groundwater is one of the most time-consuming aspects of site remediation. Extraction and treatment of contaminated water from an aquifer can take many years to complete. [*][B]Remediation method:[/B] The cleanup method selected significantly impacts the timeline. [LIST] [*][B]Excavation and removal:[/B] Physically digging up contaminated soil and hauling it to an approved disposal site is relatively fast, but it is also one of the most costly options. [*][B]Containment:[/B] Capping a site with clean soil, asphalt, or buildings can effectively contain heavy metals. This method avoids active removal but requires long-term monitoring, sometimes for 30 years or more. [*][B]Bioremediation:[/B] Using natural or enhanced biological processes to break down organic contaminants like petroleum products is often less disruptive and cheaper, but it can take longer to complete. [/LIST] [*][B]Regulatory oversight:[/B] The involvement of regulatory bodies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) can influence the timeline, especially if the site is designated a Superfund site due to severe contamination. Regulatory reviews and multi-phase processes can extend the overall project length. [*][B]Planned reuse:[/B] The planned future use of the property affects the required cleanup standards and therefore the timeline. [LIST] [*][B]Industrial use:[/B] Leaving the land as an industrial site may allow for less aggressive cleanup, as the risk of human exposure is lower. [*][B]Residential use:[/B] Redeveloping the site for housing requires a much more thorough and protective cleanup due to the high risk of long-term exposure for residents, especially children. [/LIST] [*][B]Facility size and number of structures:[/B] The physical footprint of the site and the number of buildings and foundations to demolish or treat affect the project's scale. Large former plants, like the Wisconsin Steel Works, have extensive grounds to clean up. [*][B]Financing and funding:[/B] Securing the necessary funding for cleanup can be a lengthy process. Many steel sites are brownfields, former industrial properties that require public-private partnerships or government funding for redevelopment. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
N
Wishek Sausage
Latest: NodakBob
10 minutes ago
Bbl Tech/Gain Twist Extreme
Latest: SDMF
13 minutes ago
M
Contemplating a shop build
Latest: Mike Fretty
30 minutes ago
FLOCK Cameras...Thoughts
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 12:56 PM
D
Son's 1st Goose
Latest: dsharp83
Today at 10:12 AM
NWT
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 9:46 AM
RR
Red River 8-26-26
Latest: Captainbrad
Today at 9:44 AM
Trap shooting
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Today at 8:38 AM
Cool new Gadgets
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 12:28 AM
P
Movies
Latest: Prairie Doggin'
Yesterday at 11:53 PM
RIP Dolly
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:53 PM
Mandan Slasher!!!
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 9:51 PM
NDSU to the FBS???
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 8:51 PM
new reel for all around use?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 7:44 PM
Mini excavator
Latest: MarbleEyez
Yesterday at 3:18 PM
R.I.P Dolly
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 1:54 PM
Dog
Latest: svnmag
Monday at 8:05 PM
After a Self Defense Shooting
Latest: svnmag
Monday at 7:45 PM
EHD is back..AGAIN!
Latest: Duckslayer100
Monday at 12:24 PM
Gmail anyone have it or use it
Latest: Slappy
Monday at 10:57 AM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: KDM
Monday at 10:33 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Polluting ND
Top
Bottom