Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Apres" data-source="post: 183581" data-attributes="member: 846">I appreciate all responses to the subject and want to have a well-balanced discussion on the subject as I feel this is an important decision that would affect the badlands for a long time to come whether it goes through or doesn't. The poll will not end as I feel that until a permanent decision is made one way or another this will be a relevant topic to discuss.I am of the Hunting and Fishing party as long as the individuals are on board with the issues I have at heart I could care less about what happens in their personal or political life. But I will have to look a little better at that in the future and decide whether the choices they've made would hurt the cause. ThanksIf the market supports a rancher becoming an outfitter or leading a pack train and all the rules and regulations are followed there should not be any problem with that. Horses would be a great way to help ease accessibility issues.Can't even hunt big game in Canada without an outfitter I think??, Wyoming has huge wilderness areas I think. They might have a legitimate concern for losing people. also, they are favoring the residents which every state seems too. aside from one state closing wilderness areas off what about the rest. aren't most open to hunting by nonres? to me, I would rather travel to a state that wants's my money.As I understood it these areas don't already have roads and that's the way they are trying to keep it. To preserve the areas that aren't already "wrecked". I don't want to get hung up on it but overall these are such small areas I think one is like 3 x 6 miles which mean you really don't have to walk that far if you want to see most of that area.I will take a look at the links and do a little more research about things when I have a few more mins.</blockquote>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA