What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Prairie legacy wilderness
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ndlongshot" data-source="post: 183584" data-attributes="member: 244"><p>The Wyoming wilderness requiring a guide is probably a topic big enough for a separate thread. Its BS that federal taxpayers, (landowners), can't access the land they are required to pay to maintain. It's just a good lobby effort to funnel non res hunters through the guiding industry. Think of it as economic development. Bunch of crap. I dont care if they guide there, but dont close it down.</p><p></p><p>Anyways, in regards to North Dakota, like others have said...it all depends on the details. I believe in the 70's much of the badlands qualified for wilderness status and now a very small amount does due to roads and energy development. Everything needs balance. Everything in moderation. I dont want roads on every section, but areas need to be able to have legitimate access points...and yes, honor the multiple use. As we have seen in other threads thats where things get sticky.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ndlongshot, post: 183584, member: 244"] The Wyoming wilderness requiring a guide is probably a topic big enough for a separate thread. Its BS that federal taxpayers, (landowners), can't access the land they are required to pay to maintain. It's just a good lobby effort to funnel non res hunters through the guiding industry. Think of it as economic development. Bunch of crap. I dont care if they guide there, but dont close it down. Anyways, in regards to North Dakota, like others have said...it all depends on the details. I believe in the 70's much of the badlands qualified for wilderness status and now a very small amount does due to roads and energy development. Everything needs balance. Everything in moderation. I dont want roads on every section, but areas need to be able to have legitimate access points...and yes, honor the multiple use. As we have seen in other threads thats where things get sticky. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
ICE Fishing videos
Latest: tdismydog
19 minutes ago
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: tdismydog
25 minutes ago
Cheaper Lithium for FFS shuttl
Latest: luvcatchingbass
39 minutes ago
What are these things?
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 1:53 PM
Newbie here.
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 1:35 PM
L
CCI Uppercut JHP ammo?
Latest: LBrandt
Today at 1:26 PM
Wood Stoves
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 12:59 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 12:45 PM
S
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: savage270
Today at 12:43 PM
sharpening auger blades
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 12:19 PM
Backyard chickens?
Latest: KDM
Today at 11:10 AM
S
Heated jackets
Latest: snow2
Today at 8:55 AM
D
Catfish anyone?
Latest: Downrigger
Today at 8:08 AM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Big Iron
Today at 7:46 AM
Seekins rifles
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 3:23 PM
Tire inflator
Latest: 5575
Yesterday at 1:09 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 9:33 AM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: Allen
Yesterday at 8:34 AM
L
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 2:37 AM
Wood Planer?
Latest: risingsun
Sunday at 1:51 PM
N
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: NodakBob
Sunday at 9:35 AM
F 150 Owners
Latest: 1lessdog
Sunday at 5:55 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 7:16 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Prairie legacy wilderness
Top
Bottom