What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Prairie legacy wilderness
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ndlongshot" data-source="post: 183584" data-attributes="member: 244"><p>The Wyoming wilderness requiring a guide is probably a topic big enough for a separate thread. Its BS that federal taxpayers, (landowners), can't access the land they are required to pay to maintain. It's just a good lobby effort to funnel non res hunters through the guiding industry. Think of it as economic development. Bunch of crap. I dont care if they guide there, but dont close it down.</p><p></p><p>Anyways, in regards to North Dakota, like others have said...it all depends on the details. I believe in the 70's much of the badlands qualified for wilderness status and now a very small amount does due to roads and energy development. Everything needs balance. Everything in moderation. I dont want roads on every section, but areas need to be able to have legitimate access points...and yes, honor the multiple use. As we have seen in other threads thats where things get sticky.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ndlongshot, post: 183584, member: 244"] The Wyoming wilderness requiring a guide is probably a topic big enough for a separate thread. Its BS that federal taxpayers, (landowners), can't access the land they are required to pay to maintain. It's just a good lobby effort to funnel non res hunters through the guiding industry. Think of it as economic development. Bunch of crap. I dont care if they guide there, but dont close it down. Anyways, in regards to North Dakota, like others have said...it all depends on the details. I believe in the 70's much of the badlands qualified for wilderness status and now a very small amount does due to roads and energy development. Everything needs balance. Everything in moderation. I dont want roads on every section, but areas need to be able to have legitimate access points...and yes, honor the multiple use. As we have seen in other threads thats where things get sticky. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
MN walleye possession Limits
Latest: Wally World
Yesterday at 11:34 PM
Jamestown reservoir
Latest: CrappieHunter
Yesterday at 11:15 PM
Property Tax Credit
Latest: 7mmMag
Yesterday at 8:49 PM
StrikeMaster Maven-40v
Latest: Sluggo
Yesterday at 8:05 PM
T
24 volt Strikemaster power hea
Latest: Traxion
Yesterday at 5:46 PM
R
Outdoor photo request
Latest: riverview
Yesterday at 3:35 PM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 11:10 AM
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 9:59 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 8:47 AM
MN Wolves
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 8:44 AM
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 6:04 AM
Squirrel trapping?
Latest: Obi-Wan
Thursday at 9:58 PM
R
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: riverview
Thursday at 8:19 PM
Remote camera options
Latest: Wirehair
Thursday at 7:43 PM
Batten down the hatches!
Latest: lunkerslayer
Thursday at 6:48 PM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Thursday at 1:05 PM
Satellite Internet
Latest: grantfurness
Wednesday at 10:11 PM
R
Any ice reports?
Latest: riverview
Wednesday at 9:25 PM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Jiffy
Wednesday at 7:57 PM
Alkaline lake ice conditions?
Latest: NDSportsman
Wednesday at 2:55 PM
N
ION gen2 8"
Latest: ndrivrrat
Tuesday at 5:43 PM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:51 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:43 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Prairie legacy wilderness
Top
Bottom