What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Prairie legacy wilderness
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fritz the Cat" data-source="post: 183668" data-attributes="member: 605"><p>Standard Oil/ARAMCO or Rockefeller oil got its oil from Saudi Arabia and would just as soon the oil in the United States stayed off the market or locked up in a wilderness. </p><p></p><p>Another one is Pew Charities or Pew Family owners of Sunoco Oil. They got their oil from Venezuela until it nationalized and now the bulk comes from Nigeria. Some of the best sweet crude in the world comes from Nigeria. Sunoco oil fuels NASCAR. </p><p></p><p> Pew Charitable Trusts: Pew president Rebecca Rimel has transformed a reliable backer of traditional U.S. charities into an enthusiastic supporter of a cacophony of leftist causes. The Philadelphia-based organization has about $4 billion in assets, and Pew’s environmental program, directed by Joshua S. Reichert, has donated an average of $30 million annually over the past two decades to an array of environmental causes. Once described by the Boston Globe as the “man in charge of doling out the single largest block of money earmarked for environmental causes,” Reichert told the Globe: “We are very product oriented. We need to demonstrate a return on these investments...that is measurable.” Reichert likes to tell grant recipients what he wants done and “encourages” them to form coalitions to get maximum use out of Pew’s money. He once told environmental writer Mark Dowie: “I don’t want someone who knows the facts, or can articulate them persuasively; I want someone who wants to win and knows how.”</p><p> Here are a few of the environmental groups receiving Pew grants in recent years:</p><p>* Ducks Unlimited, 2000-2004, $25,300,000 * National Environmental Trust, 2000-2004, $20,500,000 * Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund, 2000-2004, $20,476,000 * Wilderness Society, 1998-2004, $2,596,400 * Trout Unlimited, 2000-2004, $2,312,000 * National Parks & Conservation Association, 2000-2004, $2,300,000 * Save Our Wild Salmon, 2000-2004, $2,250,000 * Sierra Club, Sierra Club Foundation, 1998-2004, $1,689,000 * Union of Concerned Scientists, 2000-2004, $1,100,000 * Conservation Law Fund, 2000-2004, $906,000 * Friends of the Earth, 1998-2004, 852,335</p><p>Pew also contributed $23,119,000 to the Tides Foundation and Tides Center between 2000 and 2004. Tides’ method of operation makes it all but impossible to determine where this money goes, which is how Tides and its donors want it.</p><p></p><p>PrairieGhost, you worked for the US Geological Survey and you should have seen the numbers. Alaska has more oil then Saudi Arabia and has enough natural gas to fuel the US for several centuries. Why let Big oil through their surrogates lock up the assets in wilderness? Why import? The people of Nigeria benefit little by selling this commodity instead of making "use" of it. </p><p></p><p><img src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/04/19/article-0-1D257A3E00000578-434_964x640.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>I have to reprint this one. Apres said,</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fritz the Cat, post: 183668, member: 605"] Standard Oil/ARAMCO or Rockefeller oil got its oil from Saudi Arabia and would just as soon the oil in the United States stayed off the market or locked up in a wilderness. Another one is Pew Charities or Pew Family owners of Sunoco Oil. They got their oil from Venezuela until it nationalized and now the bulk comes from Nigeria. Some of the best sweet crude in the world comes from Nigeria. Sunoco oil fuels NASCAR. Pew Charitable Trusts: Pew president Rebecca Rimel has transformed a reliable backer of traditional U.S. charities into an enthusiastic supporter of a cacophony of leftist causes. The Philadelphia-based organization has about $4 billion in assets, and Pew’s environmental program, directed by Joshua S. Reichert, has donated an average of $30 million annually over the past two decades to an array of environmental causes. Once described by the Boston Globe as the “man in charge of doling out the single largest block of money earmarked for environmental causes,” Reichert told the Globe: “We are very product oriented. We need to demonstrate a return on these investments...that is measurable.” Reichert likes to tell grant recipients what he wants done and “encourages” them to form coalitions to get maximum use out of Pew’s money. He once told environmental writer Mark Dowie: “I don’t want someone who knows the facts, or can articulate them persuasively; I want someone who wants to win and knows how.” Here are a few of the environmental groups receiving Pew grants in recent years: * Ducks Unlimited, 2000-2004, $25,300,000 * National Environmental Trust, 2000-2004, $20,500,000 * Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund, 2000-2004, $20,476,000 * Wilderness Society, 1998-2004, $2,596,400 * Trout Unlimited, 2000-2004, $2,312,000 * National Parks & Conservation Association, 2000-2004, $2,300,000 * Save Our Wild Salmon, 2000-2004, $2,250,000 * Sierra Club, Sierra Club Foundation, 1998-2004, $1,689,000 * Union of Concerned Scientists, 2000-2004, $1,100,000 * Conservation Law Fund, 2000-2004, $906,000 * Friends of the Earth, 1998-2004, 852,335 Pew also contributed $23,119,000 to the Tides Foundation and Tides Center between 2000 and 2004. Tides’ method of operation makes it all but impossible to determine where this money goes, which is how Tides and its donors want it. PrairieGhost, you worked for the US Geological Survey and you should have seen the numbers. Alaska has more oil then Saudi Arabia and has enough natural gas to fuel the US for several centuries. Why let Big oil through their surrogates lock up the assets in wilderness? Why import? The people of Nigeria benefit little by selling this commodity instead of making "use" of it. [IMG]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/04/19/article-0-1D257A3E00000578-434_964x640.jpg[/IMG] I have to reprint this one. Apres said, [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Wood Stoves
Latest: Davy Crockett
12 minutes ago
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: lunkerslayer
26 minutes ago
S
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: savage270
28 minutes ago
What are these things?
Latest: SDMF
51 minutes ago
sharpening auger blades
Latest: Davy Crockett
52 minutes ago
CCI Uppercut JHP ammo?
Latest: SDMF
53 minutes ago
Backyard chickens?
Latest: KDM
Today at 11:10 AM
Newbie here.
Latest: KDM
Today at 11:04 AM
B
Cheaper Lithium for FFS shuttl
Latest: Browneye
Today at 10:30 AM
S
Heated jackets
Latest: snow2
Today at 8:55 AM
D
Catfish anyone?
Latest: Downrigger
Today at 8:08 AM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Big Iron
Today at 7:46 AM
Seekins rifles
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 3:23 PM
Tire inflator
Latest: 5575
Yesterday at 1:09 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 9:33 AM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: Allen
Yesterday at 8:34 AM
L
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 2:37 AM
Wood Planer?
Latest: risingsun
Sunday at 1:51 PM
N
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: NodakBob
Sunday at 9:35 AM
F 150 Owners
Latest: 1lessdog
Sunday at 5:55 AM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Rut2much
Saturday at 10:21 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 7:16 AM
Eat steak wear real fur
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 6:54 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Prairie legacy wilderness
Top
Bottom