What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Property Tax Petition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Allen" data-source="post: 374708" data-attributes="member: 389"><p>IMHOl, the closest widespread radical change I can compare this to is Prohibition. I doubt many thought there would be such widespread and negative consequences to Prohibition, and I suspect many who were in favor of it would have changed their minds if they had had the foresight to the unintended consequences of it, but that was a painful time for America. </p><p></p><p>That doesn't mean I think the loss of property taxes would lead to a resurgence of Al Capone type of gangs, but even legal side effects of this are likely to be very unpopular in the long run. </p><p></p><p>Another example of well intended laws was the Federal Flood Insurance Program. The federal government saw the need to do something with respect to large scale disasters like hurricanes, spring floods, etc. There were just so many people that were devastated by these kinds of natural disasters that they "had to do something". So, along comes federally subsidized flood insurance. Well, fast forward a fair number of years and the federal cost of subsidizing flood insurance became quite onerous and people like myself who refuse to live on a flood plain won out in Congress and a number of years ago they decided to let people who live on the flood plain start paying for the actuarial cost of living there. People who bought their homes (most glaring example I am thinking of is the Outer Banks of NC) were SHOCKED to discover they were going to see their insurance go up a few hundred percent. They fought over this in Congress for years to reach a complicated scaling up of insurance to avoid devastating the investment millions of Americans have in flood prone areas. Needless to say, flood prone areas are no longer as attractive an investment as they once were.</p><p></p><p>These may seem like far-fetched analogies to the topic at hand, but I suspect the level of change this would involve will lead to a similar level of unintended consequences.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Allen, post: 374708, member: 389"] IMHOl, the closest widespread radical change I can compare this to is Prohibition. I doubt many thought there would be such widespread and negative consequences to Prohibition, and I suspect many who were in favor of it would have changed their minds if they had had the foresight to the unintended consequences of it, but that was a painful time for America. That doesn't mean I think the loss of property taxes would lead to a resurgence of Al Capone type of gangs, but even legal side effects of this are likely to be very unpopular in the long run. Another example of well intended laws was the Federal Flood Insurance Program. The federal government saw the need to do something with respect to large scale disasters like hurricanes, spring floods, etc. There were just so many people that were devastated by these kinds of natural disasters that they "had to do something". So, along comes federally subsidized flood insurance. Well, fast forward a fair number of years and the federal cost of subsidizing flood insurance became quite onerous and people like myself who refuse to live on a flood plain won out in Congress and a number of years ago they decided to let people who live on the flood plain start paying for the actuarial cost of living there. People who bought their homes (most glaring example I am thinking of is the Outer Banks of NC) were SHOCKED to discover they were going to see their insurance go up a few hundred percent. They fought over this in Congress for years to reach a complicated scaling up of insurance to avoid devastating the investment millions of Americans have in flood prone areas. Needless to say, flood prone areas are no longer as attractive an investment as they once were. These may seem like far-fetched analogies to the topic at hand, but I suspect the level of change this would involve will lead to a similar level of unintended consequences. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
1 minute ago
POS
Latest: 5575
56 minutes ago
R
Contemplating a shop build
Latest: Ruttin
Yesterday at 8:53 PM
S
Retardation (turkey shells) YT
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 8:41 PM
S
Spring has sprung-
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 8:34 PM
Accuracy Oil YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:25 PM
Ice Fishing
Latest: bowcarp
Yesterday at 5:59 PM
Boat carpet
Latest: Slappy
Yesterday at 5:44 PM
Morels
Latest: Achucker
Yesterday at 11:54 AM
ND bighorn sheep lottery
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 11:18 AM
Sucker Minnows
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 11:15 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 1:39 AM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Monday at 10:47 PM
Tea/Laxative?! YT
Latest: svnmag
Monday at 9:27 PM
Training for the outdoors
Latest: risingsun
Monday at 6:10 PM
N
Tritoon on a pontoon trailer?
Latest: NodakBob
Monday at 3:48 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: guywhofishes
Monday at 1:21 PM
K
Fishing in Valley City
Latest: kyle12bravo
Monday at 1:00 PM
Yellowstone
Latest: tikkalover
Monday at 11:40 AM
Reloader 26 For Sale
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Monday at 7:09 AM
Auroras from last night
Latest: 5575
Sunday at 11:04 PM
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: Allen
Sunday at 10:41 PM
A-10 2026 YT
Latest: svnmag
Sunday at 8:57 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Property Tax Petition
Top
Bottom