What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
Conservation
Roadless rule repeal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lycanthrope" data-source="post: 466026" data-attributes="member: 562"><p>there will always be plenty of places to hunt away from roads. simply allowing roads doesnt fund them or mandate they be built. Roads are expensive and there will always be less accessible places for people to hunt. This will just help take the federal govt out of the mix and allow more local control over what is done. Thats what we want as conservatives right?</p><p></p><p>Ill admit the habitat comment was not stated well, but roads simply dont take up that much space, I dont think they are going to destroy enough habitat to make much difference one way or another. I feel real reason people here are opposing roads is because it increases competition for access to resources they want to keep for themselves. Im willing to listen to arguments opposing this though.</p><p></p><p>One could argue that access to remote areas would allow better management of habitat and possibly planting of food plots etc that might actually benefit wildlife in some of those areas.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lycanthrope, post: 466026, member: 562"] there will always be plenty of places to hunt away from roads. simply allowing roads doesnt fund them or mandate they be built. Roads are expensive and there will always be less accessible places for people to hunt. This will just help take the federal govt out of the mix and allow more local control over what is done. Thats what we want as conservatives right? Ill admit the habitat comment was not stated well, but roads simply dont take up that much space, I dont think they are going to destroy enough habitat to make much difference one way or another. I feel real reason people here are opposing roads is because it increases competition for access to resources they want to keep for themselves. Im willing to listen to arguments opposing this though. One could argue that access to remote areas would allow better management of habitat and possibly planting of food plots etc that might actually benefit wildlife in some of those areas. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
S
Spring snows 26
Latest: snowkiller
21 minutes ago
Fargo ?
Latest: Jiffy
44 minutes ago
F
Any Guesses
Latest: Flannel
56 minutes ago
S
ND home grown boy in NBA
Latest: SLE
Today at 6:46 AM
ATF Backdoor Gun Registry
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Today at 6:34 AM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Yesterday at 9:01 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 7:10 PM
Little heart well pipe.
Latest: tikkalover
Yesterday at 7:09 PM
New state record perch ?
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 6:35 PM
Forage Minnow Dart
Latest: Allen
Yesterday at 4:52 PM
R
Generation X
Latest: riverview
Yesterday at 3:35 PM
Steak Knives?
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 9:34 AM
Stalking Cattails/.44 Mag YT
Latest: USMCGrunt
Monday at 10:20 PM
Subsonic Loads / 300 Blackout?
Latest: 1lessdog
Monday at 4:13 PM
S
Young Griz
Latest: snow2
Monday at 8:42 AM
M14 YT
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Monday at 6:36 AM
S
Funny
Latest: snow2
Sunday at 9:27 PM
L
2026 Fishin For the Cure ND
Latest: lipripper24
Sunday at 9:51 AM
2026 SCI RRV Banquet
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Saturday at 10:03 PM
Steak Time!
Latest: Davy Crockett
Saturday at 8:44 PM
Sale
Baikal 12 gauge SS shotgun
Latest: Zogman
Saturday at 12:02 PM
S
GPS fencing for dogs
Latest: snow2
Saturday at 9:34 AM
Gilly YT
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 10:14 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
Conservation
Roadless rule repeal
Top
Bottom