What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
Conservation
Roadless rule repeal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lycanthrope" data-source="post: 466026" data-attributes="member: 562"><p>there will always be plenty of places to hunt away from roads. simply allowing roads doesnt fund them or mandate they be built. Roads are expensive and there will always be less accessible places for people to hunt. This will just help take the federal govt out of the mix and allow more local control over what is done. Thats what we want as conservatives right?</p><p></p><p>Ill admit the habitat comment was not stated well, but roads simply dont take up that much space, I dont think they are going to destroy enough habitat to make much difference one way or another. I feel real reason people here are opposing roads is because it increases competition for access to resources they want to keep for themselves. Im willing to listen to arguments opposing this though.</p><p></p><p>One could argue that access to remote areas would allow better management of habitat and possibly planting of food plots etc that might actually benefit wildlife in some of those areas.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lycanthrope, post: 466026, member: 562"] there will always be plenty of places to hunt away from roads. simply allowing roads doesnt fund them or mandate they be built. Roads are expensive and there will always be less accessible places for people to hunt. This will just help take the federal govt out of the mix and allow more local control over what is done. Thats what we want as conservatives right? Ill admit the habitat comment was not stated well, but roads simply dont take up that much space, I dont think they are going to destroy enough habitat to make much difference one way or another. I feel real reason people here are opposing roads is because it increases competition for access to resources they want to keep for themselves. Im willing to listen to arguments opposing this though. One could argue that access to remote areas would allow better management of habitat and possibly planting of food plots etc that might actually benefit wildlife in some of those areas. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Outdoor adventure bucket lis
Latest: MSA
Today at 11:25 AM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 11:03 AM
Soybeans
Latest: D-Racer
Today at 11:00 AM
Any youth hunter stories?
Latest: jpv
Today at 10:15 AM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: risingsun
Today at 10:04 AM
Cocks
Latest: johnr
Today at 9:22 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 9:13 AM
Gasoline pump prices
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 6:55 AM
Sale
4 Youth Model rifles
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 9:53 PM
Doorbell Cameras
Latest: Lou63
Yesterday at 8:51 PM
Pressure treat and alum
Latest: guywhofishes
Yesterday at 3:59 PM
Sale
Astrostart
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 10:26 AM
O
Sak
Van Hook 8-26-27-2026
Latest: OL Deadeye
Yesterday at 8:52 AM
Weekend project
Latest: bucksnbears
Yesterday at 8:19 AM
B
2013 Ice Castle 8x20
Latest: Bauer
Yesterday at 7:32 AM
N
RR
Red River 9-2-26
Latest: nanibis94
Yesterday at 3:35 AM
O
Ice house 250.00
Latest: otterwood
Sunday at 9:57 PM
"Back Strap" Diane YT
Latest: svnmag
Sunday at 8:01 PM
H
RR
Red River 9-16-26
Latest: hankowl89
Sunday at 5:45 PM
Free
Scheels Recluse bow to young h
Latest: 5575
Sunday at 4:10 PM
T
Morning Doves
Latest: Traxion
Sunday at 3:21 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
Conservation
Roadless rule repeal
Top
Bottom