Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SDMF" data-source="post: 187077" data-attributes="member: 412">Not sure what I'd have done.&nbsp; If you shoot the wolf without tooth-marks in a human or video proof of a human in grave danger, you're in for one giant pain in the backside before the ordeal is over.&nbsp; Even with toothmarks in a human, they're likely going to try and match/compare them to your own dog's teeth before believing a wolf chewed on the human.&nbsp; Dumping the wolf to save your dog is still going to get you in deep doo-doo.&nbsp; Says right in the article that wolves may not be killed except in defense of HUMAN life.As for the SSS theory, that's problematic as well.&nbsp; Most folks have a hard time with the &quot;Shut-up&quot; part.&nbsp; Secondly, the areas of MN where I've hunted ruffs are flown a LOT by MNDNR.&nbsp; Animal trails are pretty easy to see from the air as would be a fresh shallow grave.&nbsp; If you leave the thing to let the other animals scavenge it, there'll be trails and the leaves will be gone before the carcass is and it'll be visible, especially from the air.&nbsp; Once the carcass is found, they're going to work pretty hard to get to the bottom of the story.&nbsp; Trying to explain that the wolf was chasing your dog or threatening your children days, weeks, or months after the carcass is found is a mighty tall order.I'm no wolf lover and if it were up to me, they'd be treated just like coyotes, shoot on sight year 'round.&nbsp; But, that's not the reality right now and the chances of SSS working out in your favor are really pretty damned thin.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SDMF, post: 187077, member: 412"] Not sure what I'd have done. If you shoot the wolf without tooth-marks in a human or video proof of a human in grave danger, you're in for one giant pain in the backside before the ordeal is over. Even with toothmarks in a human, they're likely going to try and match/compare them to your own dog's teeth before believing a wolf chewed on the human. Dumping the wolf to save your dog is still going to get you in deep doo-doo. Says right in the article that wolves may not be killed except in defense of HUMAN life. As for the SSS theory, that's problematic as well. Most folks have a hard time with the "Shut-up" part. Secondly, the areas of MN where I've hunted ruffs are flown a LOT by MNDNR. Animal trails are pretty easy to see from the air as would be a fresh shallow grave. If you leave the thing to let the other animals scavenge it, there'll be trails and the leaves will be gone before the carcass is and it'll be visible, especially from the air. Once the carcass is found, they're going to work pretty hard to get to the bottom of the story. Trying to explain that the wolf was chasing your dog or threatening your children days, weeks, or months after the carcass is found is a mighty tall order. I'm no wolf lover and if it were up to me, they'd be treated just like coyotes, shoot on sight year 'round. But, that's not the reality right now and the chances of SSS working out in your favor are really pretty damned thin. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA