What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
Conservation
SB 2155
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wct12" data-source="post: 450131" data-attributes="member: 8117"><p>I’ve been very up front on my dislike of the the departments big game departments handling of many things. </p><p></p><p>I sat in the house energy and natural resources committee room and testified on another bill (where I voiced my displeasure on camera with just the big game departments and sang praises of other parts of the department) the same day 2155 was discussed. Did Casey Anderson with the department stand up there (it’s submitted testimony as neutral and his testimony was mostly neutral) and lay out the facts on license numbers per unit and then say that this bill might open a few more units because their needs to be X number of license (no landowners) available and allude to it being fine?</p><p></p><p>As I said. I don’t support the bill but I support a change of some kind. I just don’t like the chance of losing more access where access is already extremely limited. </p><p></p><p>I also did not sign in on 2155 taking a stance either way when I was there. Just so you know.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wct12, post: 450131, member: 8117"] I’ve been very up front on my dislike of the the departments big game departments handling of many things. I sat in the house energy and natural resources committee room and testified on another bill (where I voiced my displeasure on camera with just the big game departments and sang praises of other parts of the department) the same day 2155 was discussed. Did Casey Anderson with the department stand up there (it’s submitted testimony as neutral and his testimony was mostly neutral) and lay out the facts on license numbers per unit and then say that this bill might open a few more units because their needs to be X number of license (no landowners) available and allude to it being fine? As I said. I don’t support the bill but I support a change of some kind. I just don’t like the chance of losing more access where access is already extremely limited. I also did not sign in on 2155 taking a stance either way when I was there. Just so you know. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
S
ND home grown boy in NBA
Latest: SLE
33 minutes ago
Fargo ?
Latest: Zogman
39 minutes ago
ATF Backdoor Gun Registry
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
45 minutes ago
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Yesterday at 9:01 PM
G
Any Guesses
Latest: garden
Yesterday at 8:52 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 7:10 PM
Little heart well pipe.
Latest: tikkalover
Yesterday at 7:09 PM
New state record perch ?
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 6:35 PM
Forage Minnow Dart
Latest: Allen
Yesterday at 4:52 PM
R
Generation X
Latest: riverview
Yesterday at 3:35 PM
Steak Knives?
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 9:34 AM
Stalking Cattails/.44 Mag YT
Latest: USMCGrunt
Monday at 10:20 PM
Subsonic Loads / 300 Blackout?
Latest: 1lessdog
Monday at 4:13 PM
S
Spring snows 26
Latest: snow2
Monday at 2:13 PM
S
Young Griz
Latest: snow2
Monday at 8:42 AM
M14 YT
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Monday at 6:36 AM
S
Funny
Latest: snow2
Sunday at 9:27 PM
L
2026 Fishin For the Cure ND
Latest: lipripper24
Sunday at 9:51 AM
2026 SCI RRV Banquet
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Saturday at 10:03 PM
Steak Time!
Latest: Davy Crockett
Saturday at 8:44 PM
Sale
Baikal 12 gauge SS shotgun
Latest: Zogman
Saturday at 12:02 PM
S
GPS fencing for dogs
Latest: snow2
Saturday at 9:34 AM
Gilly YT
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 10:14 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
Conservation
SB 2155
Top
Bottom