What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
Conservation
SB 2155
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wct12" data-source="post: 450131" data-attributes="member: 8117"><p>I’ve been very up front on my dislike of the the departments big game departments handling of many things. </p><p></p><p>I sat in the house energy and natural resources committee room and testified on another bill (where I voiced my displeasure on camera with just the big game departments and sang praises of other parts of the department) the same day 2155 was discussed. Did Casey Anderson with the department stand up there (it’s submitted testimony as neutral and his testimony was mostly neutral) and lay out the facts on license numbers per unit and then say that this bill might open a few more units because their needs to be X number of license (no landowners) available and allude to it being fine?</p><p></p><p>As I said. I don’t support the bill but I support a change of some kind. I just don’t like the chance of losing more access where access is already extremely limited. </p><p></p><p>I also did not sign in on 2155 taking a stance either way when I was there. Just so you know.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wct12, post: 450131, member: 8117"] I’ve been very up front on my dislike of the the departments big game departments handling of many things. I sat in the house energy and natural resources committee room and testified on another bill (where I voiced my displeasure on camera with just the big game departments and sang praises of other parts of the department) the same day 2155 was discussed. Did Casey Anderson with the department stand up there (it’s submitted testimony as neutral and his testimony was mostly neutral) and lay out the facts on license numbers per unit and then say that this bill might open a few more units because their needs to be X number of license (no landowners) available and allude to it being fine? As I said. I don’t support the bill but I support a change of some kind. I just don’t like the chance of losing more access where access is already extremely limited. I also did not sign in on 2155 taking a stance either way when I was there. Just so you know. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Outdoor adventure bucket lis
Latest: MSA
Today at 11:25 AM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 11:03 AM
Soybeans
Latest: D-Racer
Today at 11:00 AM
Any youth hunter stories?
Latest: jpv
Today at 10:15 AM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: risingsun
Today at 10:04 AM
Cocks
Latest: johnr
Today at 9:22 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 9:13 AM
Gasoline pump prices
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 6:55 AM
Sale
4 Youth Model rifles
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 9:53 PM
Doorbell Cameras
Latest: Lou63
Yesterday at 8:51 PM
Pressure treat and alum
Latest: guywhofishes
Yesterday at 3:59 PM
Sale
Astrostart
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 10:26 AM
O
Sak
Van Hook 8-26-27-2026
Latest: OL Deadeye
Yesterday at 8:52 AM
Weekend project
Latest: bucksnbears
Yesterday at 8:19 AM
B
2013 Ice Castle 8x20
Latest: Bauer
Yesterday at 7:32 AM
N
RR
Red River 9-2-26
Latest: nanibis94
Yesterday at 3:35 AM
O
Ice house 250.00
Latest: otterwood
Sunday at 9:57 PM
"Back Strap" Diane YT
Latest: svnmag
Sunday at 8:01 PM
H
RR
Red River 9-16-26
Latest: hankowl89
Sunday at 5:45 PM
Free
Scheels Recluse bow to young h
Latest: 5575
Sunday at 4:10 PM
T
Morning Doves
Latest: Traxion
Sunday at 3:21 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
Conservation
SB 2155
Top
Bottom