Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Trip McNeely" data-source="post: 445638" data-attributes="member: 728"><p>I can agree with the above. I guess it all depends on one of three categories. 1) deer numbers are lower than you want= stop killing does 2) stable and around where you want = Limited number of tags for does of which youth tags count towards. 3) too many deer= increased tags to reduce numbers…… IMO we are at number 1 and the game and fish is letting number 3 rip <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤷🏼" title="Person shrugging: medium-light skin tone&nbsp; &nbsp; :person_shrugging_tone2:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f937-1f3fc.png" data-shortname=":person_shrugging_tone2:" /> like KDM said we give an opportunity now which takes 20 opportunities away from lack of productivity of that dead doe. Im all for the youth and opportunities but from what I’ve seen in the badlands the last few years mule deer numbers arent very great.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Trip McNeely, post: 445638, member: 728"] I can agree with the above. I guess it all depends on one of three categories. 1) deer numbers are lower than you want= stop killing does 2) stable and around where you want = Limited number of tags for does of which youth tags count towards. 3) too many deer= increased tags to reduce numbers…… IMO we are at number 1 and the game and fish is letting number 3 rip 🤷🏼 like KDM said we give an opportunity now which takes 20 opportunities away from lack of productivity of that dead doe. Im all for the youth and opportunities but from what I’ve seen in the badlands the last few years mule deer numbers arent very great. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA