What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Sb 2315 - final house vote delayed!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dirty" data-source="post: 256157" data-attributes="member: 6535"><p>This is the first time I've paid so much attention to a legislative topic. I saw two types of representatives throughout the hearings and sessions that I watched. I'm specifically talking about the representatives, not the attendees at the hearings (such as illegitimate hunters).</p><p>I am a landowner. I am in a family of landowners. I am a hunter (sometimes legitimate and sometimes illegitimate). These were my observations:</p><p></p><p>One type (and most of them were <u>non-hunting</u> ag folks overwhelmingly in support of this bill) were pushing their own agenda for their own direct benefit. In no way, shape, or form did they appear to be the acting as a voice of the people in their district. They were against wildlife programs, against hunting, against anyone but themselves pretty much. Lots of chips on their shoulders. They were largely unwilling to listen to compromise or any other perspective. They often times were red-faced and pissed off that there could possibly be another perspective other than their own. They clearly were not considering viewpoints of their voters if not dovetailing their own. Right up to the end they used threats if things didn't go their way. Their behavior was often pretty disgusting.</p><p></p><p>The other type (and most seemed to be <u>non-hunting</u> (or at least not actively hunting on a regular basis) representatives that were against this bill) truly seemed to be analyzing the information they had before them and processing the concerns that had been brought forth to them so they could make the best decision that represented their voters. They weren't claiming to have all the answers, but just didn't believe this bill was the answer. They made really good examples of what a representative should be and should do at these sessions. No special interests, no self-serving agenda, no shenanigans, no settling for an ill-advised plan. They were calm and collected when explaining themselves. Overall, the way they handled themselves on such a heated topic was impressive. They restored some faith in humanity for me, EVEN if they were for this bill.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dirty, post: 256157, member: 6535"] This is the first time I've paid so much attention to a legislative topic. I saw two types of representatives throughout the hearings and sessions that I watched. I'm specifically talking about the representatives, not the attendees at the hearings (such as illegitimate hunters). I am a landowner. I am in a family of landowners. I am a hunter (sometimes legitimate and sometimes illegitimate). These were my observations: One type (and most of them were [U]non-hunting[/U] ag folks overwhelmingly in support of this bill) were pushing their own agenda for their own direct benefit. In no way, shape, or form did they appear to be the acting as a voice of the people in their district. They were against wildlife programs, against hunting, against anyone but themselves pretty much. Lots of chips on their shoulders. They were largely unwilling to listen to compromise or any other perspective. They often times were red-faced and pissed off that there could possibly be another perspective other than their own. They clearly were not considering viewpoints of their voters if not dovetailing their own. Right up to the end they used threats if things didn't go their way. Their behavior was often pretty disgusting. The other type (and most seemed to be [U]non-hunting[/U] (or at least not actively hunting on a regular basis) representatives that were against this bill) truly seemed to be analyzing the information they had before them and processing the concerns that had been brought forth to them so they could make the best decision that represented their voters. They weren't claiming to have all the answers, but just didn't believe this bill was the answer. They made really good examples of what a representative should be and should do at these sessions. No special interests, no self-serving agenda, no shenanigans, no settling for an ill-advised plan. They were calm and collected when explaining themselves. Overall, the way they handled themselves on such a heated topic was impressive. They restored some faith in humanity for me, EVEN if they were for this bill. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Destination Fishing Trip??
Latest: ndfinfan
Today at 4:42 AM
Handgun Choices
Latest: Maddog
Today at 3:40 AM
Jerkbaits In a Pool
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:44 PM
You’re never a nobody.
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 9:01 PM
The Birds.........
Latest: Davey Crockett
Yesterday at 7:34 PM
NDSFC Annual Banquet April 26
Latest: Honkerherms
Yesterday at 7:15 PM
Stock market
Latest: Davey Crockett
Yesterday at 6:51 PM
Ready or not, here it comes.
Latest: Davey Crockett
Yesterday at 6:21 PM
Oahe, Smelt, thoughts?
Latest: risingsun
Yesterday at 4:59 PM
March 29
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 2:25 PM
L
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 10:41 AM
R
Memes
Latest: rustneversleeps
Yesterday at 8:49 AM
Possible ban ffs sota
Latest: Captainbrad
Yesterday at 7:35 AM
Same Dean Nelson?
Latest: Davey Crockett
Yesterday at 6:12 AM
R
Open water?
Latest: Reprobait
Yesterday at 5:46 AM
M
Getting into Canada
Latest: measure-it
Tuesday at 6:19 PM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: Jiffy
Tuesday at 12:32 PM
Real Estate Taxes
Latest: wslayer
Tuesday at 9:58 AM
Pedophiles in ND Legislature
Latest: NDSportsman
Tuesday at 6:23 AM
😁
Latest: 5575
Monday at 7:22 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Sb 2315 - final house vote delayed!!
Top
Bottom