Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="deleted user" data-source="post: 256165" data-attributes="member: 1778">The whole “sportsmen need to come to the table” is what gets me. Like I said before, when I communicated my thoughts, many times I was told that all hunters do is litter and shoot the place up, and somehow there was nothing a landowner could do so we need to pass this. The app idea had potential, but when I asked that they come up with an idea of who will fund/operate/maintain it before passing this bill, I was told it should pass and then they could figure it out. I thought the “2 years or everything is automatically passed” ultimatum was a bad idea since someone could purposely gridlock in order to get their way. I suggested a voluntary $5 license fee to go towards metal signs, I suggested perhaps legacy money expanding PLOTS, and paying for “deputy” game wardens to help enforce all these trespassing and property damage incidents. Increasing the minimum fines. All suggestions I made, yet I’m not “coming to the table” because I won’t cede that this is somehow the best bill written, and needs no compromise. Also, everyone who’s argument back is they they should be able to picnic in my yard whenever they want, come on over. Hope you like miller lite otherwise byob. Just support me when I want my dwelling taxed like my land. Why don’t we all come to the table and be honest. Some don’t want people to even look at their land, they’ll never be happy. Some don’t mind hunters but have been messed with, let’s talk about what could be done. Some just want to know who’s out there. This bill wouldn’t have made anyone happy since it wouldn’t stop crime, and would have pushed more acres out of access. I’m happy with the bills division as a compromise. Rant over.Stay thirsty my illegitimate friends.</blockquote>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA