What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
SB 2315 - In Cmte 3/14 - ACTION REQUIRED!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BBQBluesMan" data-source="post: 251879" data-attributes="member: 1007"><p>-No one knows how much this database is going to cost. Not the initial startup or the yearly cost. I don’t even think anyone knows who will be footing the bill. NDGF? North Dakota IT Dept?</p><p></p><p>-No one knows which counties even have the data or capability to join such a database. No one knows how long it would take to get counties up to speed. </p><p></p><p>-No one knows how much this will cost each county. Are they going to have to hire 1-2 full time staff to particiapte? No one knows that either. </p><p></p><p>-No one knows whom in the county decides to enter their county into the database. </p><p></p><p>-No one knows how often the database would need to be updated.</p><p></p><p>-What will be the landowner participation in this database? No one knows that either. Remember that if a county opts in and a landowner doesn’t designate his or her land in the database, it’s automatically listed as OPEN on the database. But physical posting still supersedes the database. This ought to not confuse anyone or cause any issues. SMH</p><p></p><p>-No other state has a database like this. Why? Because it is a costly waste of time.</p><p></p><p>-No one knows the economic impact this will have to the state via loss of revenue generated from hunting and fishing because mark my words, this WILL affect access and not in a good way.</p><p></p><p>-if landowners currently don’t participate in plots, why would they willingly advertise their land for public use? </p><p></p><p>-pretty soon this multimillion dollar waste of money will just show a electronic database of posted land. Don’t even ask. And you can’t even ask because no contact information is required for that category.</p><p></p><p>The chief information officer for North Dakota was wrangled up to give testimony. He played the new guy card for every damn question he was asked by the dual committees. No one knows hardly anything about this database, but we need to do something by golly, and this is it folks!! This is the answer, spending millions on a costly/logistical nightmare of an electronic "access" database.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BBQBluesMan, post: 251879, member: 1007"] -No one knows how much this database is going to cost. Not the initial startup or the yearly cost. I don’t even think anyone knows who will be footing the bill. NDGF? North Dakota IT Dept? -No one knows which counties even have the data or capability to join such a database. No one knows how long it would take to get counties up to speed. -No one knows how much this will cost each county. Are they going to have to hire 1-2 full time staff to particiapte? No one knows that either. -No one knows whom in the county decides to enter their county into the database. -No one knows how often the database would need to be updated. -What will be the landowner participation in this database? No one knows that either. Remember that if a county opts in and a landowner doesn’t designate his or her land in the database, it’s automatically listed as OPEN on the database. But physical posting still supersedes the database. This ought to not confuse anyone or cause any issues. SMH -No other state has a database like this. Why? Because it is a costly waste of time. -No one knows the economic impact this will have to the state via loss of revenue generated from hunting and fishing because mark my words, this WILL affect access and not in a good way. -if landowners currently don’t participate in plots, why would they willingly advertise their land for public use? -pretty soon this multimillion dollar waste of money will just show a electronic database of posted land. Don’t even ask. And you can’t even ask because no contact information is required for that category. The chief information officer for North Dakota was wrangled up to give testimony. He played the new guy card for every damn question he was asked by the dual committees. No one knows hardly anything about this database, but we need to do something by golly, and this is it folks!! This is the answer, spending millions on a costly/logistical nightmare of an electronic "access" database. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
HUMIDITY
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 12:36 AM
Yellowstone tourist again.
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 10:12 PM
***FOUND***
Latest: Honkerherms
Yesterday at 9:28 PM
Bbl Tech/Gain Twist Extreme
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:58 PM
Golden walleye
Latest: Sum1
Yesterday at 6:42 PM
MT Governors Cup 2026 results
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 6:31 PM
NWT
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 5:21 PM
Yellowstone tourist again.
Latest: shorthairsrus
Yesterday at 4:29 PM
S
BWCA closed.
Latest: scrotcaster
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Old Lowrance
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 2:46 PM
S
Buick Enclave/Chevy Traverse?
Latest: SLE
Yesterday at 2:12 PM
S
Yellowstone tourist again.
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 2:03 PM
J
FLOCK Cameras...Thoughts
Latest: jdfisherman
Yesterday at 12:09 PM
L
Polluting ND
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 8:22 AM
"Jig" YT
Latest: svnmag
Sunday at 10:55 PM
Clear Cranks/Jerks YT
Latest: svnmag
Sunday at 8:55 PM
Willie's
Latest: svnmag
Sunday at 8:46 PM
Food porn
Latest: tikkalover
Sunday at 2:50 PM
Generation X
Latest: Rowdie
Sunday at 2:28 PM
Uncle Ted (again)
Latest: Rowdie
Sunday at 2:23 PM
Boat Ramp Play-by-Play
Latest: Rowdie
Sunday at 1:24 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
SB 2315 - In Cmte 3/14 - ACTION REQUIRED!
Top
Bottom