What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Sb 2315 - reborn after house gutting!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="njsimonson" data-source="post: 258442" data-attributes="member: 1507"><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'">Erbele's bill sought "a bridge" for landowners and hunters. Landowners said in testimony they simply want to know who is on their land, while signage can be frustrating. The bill originally proposed a land database similar to GPS hunting apps such as onX. </span></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'"><strong>Wrong - the bill originally only proposed a listing for those who wanted to leave their land open after everything was posted under the bill - like the coyote hunting guide or PLOTS (remember: they called their listing program Private Land Open To ... Hunters, LOL, though they did try to call it a database of sorts). </strong></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'"><strong></strong></span></span></p><p> <span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'"><strong>The true "database" idea (for all types of land - posted, unposted, absolutely posted) didn't come to be until after the proponents knew the "everything's posted" nature of the original legislation would lose out in the senate. </strong></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'"><strong></strong></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'"><strong></strong></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'"></span></span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p>One final comment on this "news" - "<span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'">He said solutions have been hard to find. Electronic land posting comes down to how reliable it is, he said, such as keeping up with new landowners."</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'">The reason solutions are so hard to find, is that most everyone involved can't see the forest for the database tree they've been staring at, measuring, inspecting and fighting over since February. Simpler solutions, easier changes to the code, better ways forward exist if only they'd just be considered. </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="njsimonson, post: 258442, member: 1507"] [COLOR=#444444][FONT=Yrsa]Erbele's bill sought "a bridge" for landowners and hunters. Landowners said in testimony they simply want to know who is on their land, while signage can be frustrating. The bill originally proposed a land database similar to GPS hunting apps such as onX. [B]Wrong - the bill originally only proposed a listing for those who wanted to leave their land open after everything was posted under the bill - like the coyote hunting guide or PLOTS (remember: they called their listing program Private Land Open To ... Hunters, LOL, though they did try to call it a database of sorts). The true "database" idea (for all types of land - posted, unposted, absolutely posted) didn't come to be until after the proponents knew the "everything's posted" nature of the original legislation would lose out in the senate. [/B] [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] One final comment on this "news" - "[COLOR=#444444][FONT=Yrsa]He said solutions have been hard to find. Electronic land posting comes down to how reliable it is, he said, such as keeping up with new landowners." The reason solutions are so hard to find, is that most everyone involved can't see the forest for the database tree they've been staring at, measuring, inspecting and fighting over since February. Simpler solutions, easier changes to the code, better ways forward exist if only they'd just be considered. [/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Allen
Today at 1:05 AM
F 150 Owners
Latest: CrappieHunter
Yesterday at 11:32 PM
M
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Migrator Man
Yesterday at 9:30 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 7:56 PM
X
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: xFishSlayerx
Yesterday at 6:43 PM
A
Tire inflator
Latest: Auggie
Yesterday at 3:10 PM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Rut2much
Yesterday at 10:21 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 7:16 AM
Eat steak wear real fur
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 6:54 AM
P
Anyone see that one coming
Latest: PrairieGhost
Yesterday at 6:42 AM
Rods From god YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 1:36 AM
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 11:58 PM
N
Heated jackets
Latest: ndrivrrat
Friday at 5:07 PM
Seekins rifles
Latest: lunkerslayer
Friday at 4:54 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Davy Crockett
Friday at 3:58 PM
B
Ice fishing Sak
Latest: Bcblazek
Friday at 3:05 PM
Wood Planer?
Latest: BDub
Friday at 11:36 AM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: ktm450
Friday at 8:37 AM
Packers
Latest: Allen
Thursday at 11:43 PM
Montana Snowpack
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:45 PM
Bud Heavy
Latest: Zogman
Thursday at 8:20 AM
Oops
Latest: NDSportsman
Thursday at 6:09 AM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SDMF
Wednesday at 10:33 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Sb 2315 - reborn after house gutting!
Top
Bottom