What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Sb 2315 - reborn after house gutting!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="njsimonson" data-source="post: 258442" data-attributes="member: 1507"><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'">Erbele's bill sought "a bridge" for landowners and hunters. Landowners said in testimony they simply want to know who is on their land, while signage can be frustrating. The bill originally proposed a land database similar to GPS hunting apps such as onX. </span></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'"><strong>Wrong - the bill originally only proposed a listing for those who wanted to leave their land open after everything was posted under the bill - like the coyote hunting guide or PLOTS (remember: they called their listing program Private Land Open To ... Hunters, LOL, though they did try to call it a database of sorts). </strong></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'"><strong></strong></span></span></p><p> <span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'"><strong>The true "database" idea (for all types of land - posted, unposted, absolutely posted) didn't come to be until after the proponents knew the "everything's posted" nature of the original legislation would lose out in the senate. </strong></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'"><strong></strong></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'"><strong></strong></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'"></span></span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p>One final comment on this "news" - "<span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'">He said solutions have been hard to find. Electronic land posting comes down to how reliable it is, he said, such as keeping up with new landowners."</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'">The reason solutions are so hard to find, is that most everyone involved can't see the forest for the database tree they've been staring at, measuring, inspecting and fighting over since February. Simpler solutions, easier changes to the code, better ways forward exist if only they'd just be considered. </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="njsimonson, post: 258442, member: 1507"] [COLOR=#444444][FONT=Yrsa]Erbele's bill sought "a bridge" for landowners and hunters. Landowners said in testimony they simply want to know who is on their land, while signage can be frustrating. The bill originally proposed a land database similar to GPS hunting apps such as onX. [B]Wrong - the bill originally only proposed a listing for those who wanted to leave their land open after everything was posted under the bill - like the coyote hunting guide or PLOTS (remember: they called their listing program Private Land Open To ... Hunters, LOL, though they did try to call it a database of sorts). The true "database" idea (for all types of land - posted, unposted, absolutely posted) didn't come to be until after the proponents knew the "everything's posted" nature of the original legislation would lose out in the senate. [/B] [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] One final comment on this "news" - "[COLOR=#444444][FONT=Yrsa]He said solutions have been hard to find. Electronic land posting comes down to how reliable it is, he said, such as keeping up with new landowners." The reason solutions are so hard to find, is that most everyone involved can't see the forest for the database tree they've been staring at, measuring, inspecting and fighting over since February. Simpler solutions, easier changes to the code, better ways forward exist if only they'd just be considered. [/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Scott Martin resigns from bass
Latest: Kurtr
22 minutes ago
Open water?
Latest: 5575
48 minutes ago
Memes
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 6:57 AM
Battle of the sexes
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:29 PM
Crude oil prices!
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 3:39 PM
T
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: Twitch
Yesterday at 9:09 AM
M
Oahe, Smelt, thoughts?
Latest: Migrator Man
Yesterday at 8:25 AM
J
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: jer79
Yesterday at 1:14 AM
D
March 29
Latest: db-2
Yesterday at 12:55 AM
You’re never a nobody.
Latest: 1lessdog
Friday at 11:43 PM
Spring Turkey 2025
Latest: Freedom
Friday at 9:27 PM
Let's See a BaseBall Game
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Friday at 5:49 PM
Destination Fishing Trip??
Latest: johnr
Friday at 4:06 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Friday at 3:38 PM
Jerkbaits In a Pool
Latest: Jiffy
Friday at 12:38 PM
Ready or not, here it comes.
Latest: lunkerslayer
Friday at 6:28 AM
Spring Snows
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Thursday at 8:32 PM
R
The Birds.........
Latest: Retired Educator
Thursday at 1:52 PM
L
Handgun Choices
Latest: LBrandt
Thursday at 1:49 PM
NDSFC Annual Banquet April 26
Latest: Honkerherms
Wednesday at 7:15 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Sb 2315 - reborn after house gutting!
Top
Bottom