Reply to thread

Message

majority of the farmers are corporations now. And the head of the corporation is the government (taxpayers). Most are operating at max profit potential now. Corporations in the way your thinking would hardly change any of that. Companies like green giant haven’t caused any worse effects in the states they operate. If major corporations owned the land they would simply contract with current farmers to grow what they desired to grow. Just like green giant contracts farmers to raise peas and corn etc. but preservation companies could own land to help habitat such as pheasants forever. There’s absolutely no reason why PF shouldn’t be allowed to own land in this state.

[QUOTE="eyexer, post: 258488, member: 315"] majority of the farmers are corporations now. And the head of the corporation is the government (taxpayers). Most are operating at max profit potential now. Corporations in the way your thinking would hardly change any of that. Companies like green giant haven’t caused any worse effects in the states they operate. If major corporations owned the land they would simply contract with current farmers to grow what they desired to grow. Just like green giant contracts farmers to raise peas and corn etc. but preservation companies could own land to help habitat such as pheasants forever. There’s absolutely no reason why PF shouldn’t be allowed to own land in this state. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA