Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Trip McNeely" data-source="post: 438843" data-attributes="member: 728"><p>Wrong. It’s completely the opposite of what you just said. You are missing the point. It’s very peculiar you would call farmers/ ranchers/landowners and sportsman for this bill “anti-hunting”. Whether you are willing  to accept it or not this state is over 90% privately owned. Being in opposition of this bill won’t get you any more access to hunting opportunities and I wish some of you smooth brains understood this. We sit here and complain about access and then people like you want to tell landowners what they can or cannot do on their own property when scientifically there is no evidence whatsoever that baiting spreads CWD. This isn’t a landowner against sportsman bill. This is a government overreach and control vs. landowner/sportsman bill. Most sportsman i know are for this bill. Most landowners I know are for this bill. We’re on the same side on this issue. This bill is for landowner rights as well as for providing more opportunities. More deer=more opportunities. It’s literally that simple. It seems to me those that dont want this bill are either with the government in Some capacity or are government boot lickers of sorts.explain to me how if we let the government continue with this joke called cwd and we end up slaughtering more deer we will have more opportunities as sportsman? We go from 150k tags to 55k tags in a decade? Take off your rose colored glasses and see the mismanaging from our own government.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA