What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
SB2137
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BrockW" data-source="post: 440788" data-attributes="member: 5910"><p>Seriously? I think you better read that again. The article doesn’t say the deer had it for 9 years. It says a 9 yr old doe was found positive.</p><p></p><p>I hear these claims, but no one, not one person can present the EPI to prove it. If a farmed cervid tests positive, that’s recorded in state records. Records which should be available to the deer farmer and upon public information request to the public. That deer would be identified, quarantined, and documented. There would be a paper trail to prove that animal had the disease that long with all testing records. Yet, the EPI never materializes to show these claims are true.</p><p></p><p>It was kind of funny when Dusty was claiming in 2023 that apple creek had a deer that had the disease for 10 years. Apple creek had a cull in 2017 because of some positive does that had been transferred from another deer farm. They tested every animal on that ranch in 2017, culled the positives, and somehow in 2023 they had a doe that had the disease for 10 years. Thats mathematically impossible and no testing records to back up the claim. I checked.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I don’t know man, it seems kind of pathetic that you have to make assertions like that. But since that seems to hold some sort of importance with you, I never got the jab. I got the c one niner and it knocked me on my ass for a month and I figured I had the antibodies after that. But I also don’t have super strong feelings about it and don’t judge people either way.</p><p></p><p>Well….it is…</p><p></p><p></p><p>Already a high prevalence area. And guys claiming “it doesn’t kill deer” or “there’s no proof it kills deer” is part of the reason they let them go after they’re positive. Because they know some portion of them will die from end stage disease and then they’ll have documented proof. It’s just too bad proof doesn’t matter for some folks. Again…the amoeba.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BrockW, post: 440788, member: 5910"] Seriously? I think you better read that again. The article doesn’t say the deer had it for 9 years. It says a 9 yr old doe was found positive. I hear these claims, but no one, not one person can present the EPI to prove it. If a farmed cervid tests positive, that’s recorded in state records. Records which should be available to the deer farmer and upon public information request to the public. That deer would be identified, quarantined, and documented. There would be a paper trail to prove that animal had the disease that long with all testing records. Yet, the EPI never materializes to show these claims are true. It was kind of funny when Dusty was claiming in 2023 that apple creek had a deer that had the disease for 10 years. Apple creek had a cull in 2017 because of some positive does that had been transferred from another deer farm. They tested every animal on that ranch in 2017, culled the positives, and somehow in 2023 they had a doe that had the disease for 10 years. Thats mathematically impossible and no testing records to back up the claim. I checked. I don’t know man, it seems kind of pathetic that you have to make assertions like that. But since that seems to hold some sort of importance with you, I never got the jab. I got the c one niner and it knocked me on my ass for a month and I figured I had the antibodies after that. But I also don’t have super strong feelings about it and don’t judge people either way. Well….it is… Already a high prevalence area. And guys claiming “it doesn’t kill deer” or “there’s no proof it kills deer” is part of the reason they let them go after they’re positive. Because they know some portion of them will die from end stage disease and then they’ll have documented proof. It’s just too bad proof doesn’t matter for some folks. Again…the amoeba. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Wolves at J Clark Sawyer
Latest: 1lessdog
7 minutes ago
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Wally World
40 minutes ago
Outdoor photo request
Latest: Zogman
Today at 5:03 PM
W
Which one you did this?
Latest: walleyeman_1875
Today at 12:17 PM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: wslayer
Today at 8:05 AM
Any ice reports?
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 8:03 PM
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 1:09 PM
S
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 9:46 AM
Deer speeds.
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 9:08 AM
6.5 Creedmore
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 8:25 AM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 8:53 PM
N
Crazy Fingers
Latest: NodakBob
Saturday at 2:39 PM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Saturday at 9:08 AM
P
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: Pheasant 54
Friday at 10:44 PM
It's been a good season.
Latest: grumster
Friday at 9:00 PM
Montana to cut deer tags
Latest: Kurtr
Friday at 2:03 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Friday at 11:17 AM
S
Satellite Internet
Latest: sdietrich
Thursday at 10:34 PM
T
Let's talk EBIKES!!!
Latest: Traxion
Thursday at 8:56 PM
L
Hard decision -Dog
Latest: LBrandt
Thursday at 5:29 PM
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: tdismydog
Thursday at 3:15 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
Thursday at 2:52 PM
Dickinson Sporting Complex
Latest: Wirehair
Thursday at 10:55 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
SB2137
Top
Bottom