What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
SB2137
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BrockW" data-source="post: 440788" data-attributes="member: 5910"><p>Seriously? I think you better read that again. The article doesn’t say the deer had it for 9 years. It says a 9 yr old doe was found positive.</p><p></p><p>I hear these claims, but no one, not one person can present the EPI to prove it. If a farmed cervid tests positive, that’s recorded in state records. Records which should be available to the deer farmer and upon public information request to the public. That deer would be identified, quarantined, and documented. There would be a paper trail to prove that animal had the disease that long with all testing records. Yet, the EPI never materializes to show these claims are true.</p><p></p><p>It was kind of funny when Dusty was claiming in 2023 that apple creek had a deer that had the disease for 10 years. Apple creek had a cull in 2017 because of some positive does that had been transferred from another deer farm. They tested every animal on that ranch in 2017, culled the positives, and somehow in 2023 they had a doe that had the disease for 10 years. Thats mathematically impossible and no testing records to back up the claim. I checked.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I don’t know man, it seems kind of pathetic that you have to make assertions like that. But since that seems to hold some sort of importance with you, I never got the jab. I got the c one niner and it knocked me on my ass for a month and I figured I had the antibodies after that. But I also don’t have super strong feelings about it and don’t judge people either way.</p><p></p><p>Well….it is…</p><p></p><p></p><p>Already a high prevalence area. And guys claiming “it doesn’t kill deer” or “there’s no proof it kills deer” is part of the reason they let them go after they’re positive. Because they know some portion of them will die from end stage disease and then they’ll have documented proof. It’s just too bad proof doesn’t matter for some folks. Again…the amoeba.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BrockW, post: 440788, member: 5910"] Seriously? I think you better read that again. The article doesn’t say the deer had it for 9 years. It says a 9 yr old doe was found positive. I hear these claims, but no one, not one person can present the EPI to prove it. If a farmed cervid tests positive, that’s recorded in state records. Records which should be available to the deer farmer and upon public information request to the public. That deer would be identified, quarantined, and documented. There would be a paper trail to prove that animal had the disease that long with all testing records. Yet, the EPI never materializes to show these claims are true. It was kind of funny when Dusty was claiming in 2023 that apple creek had a deer that had the disease for 10 years. Apple creek had a cull in 2017 because of some positive does that had been transferred from another deer farm. They tested every animal on that ranch in 2017, culled the positives, and somehow in 2023 they had a doe that had the disease for 10 years. Thats mathematically impossible and no testing records to back up the claim. I checked. I don’t know man, it seems kind of pathetic that you have to make assertions like that. But since that seems to hold some sort of importance with you, I never got the jab. I got the c one niner and it knocked me on my ass for a month and I figured I had the antibodies after that. But I also don’t have super strong feelings about it and don’t judge people either way. Well….it is… Already a high prevalence area. And guys claiming “it doesn’t kill deer” or “there’s no proof it kills deer” is part of the reason they let them go after they’re positive. Because they know some portion of them will die from end stage disease and then they’ll have documented proof. It’s just too bad proof doesn’t matter for some folks. Again…the amoeba. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Batten down the hatches!
Latest: 5575
15 minutes ago
Satellite Internet
Latest: grantfurness
15 minutes ago
R
Any ice reports?
Latest: riverview
Today at 9:25 PM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 9:14 PM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 7:57 PM
F
Property Tax Credit
Latest: Fester
Today at 7:33 PM
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: risingsun
Today at 6:41 PM
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Today at 4:38 PM
Alkaline lake ice conditions?
Latest: NDSportsman
Today at 2:55 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 2:54 PM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Walleye Slayer
Today at 10:09 AM
N
ION gen2 8"
Latest: ndrivrrat
Yesterday at 5:43 PM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 4:51 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 4:43 PM
Wolves at J Clark Sawyer
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 11:08 AM
Outdoor photo request
Latest: JMF
Yesterday at 5:46 AM
W
Which one you did this?
Latest: walleyeman_1875
Monday at 12:17 PM
S
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: snow2
Sunday at 9:46 AM
Deer speeds.
Latest: Kurtr
Sunday at 9:08 AM
6.5 Creedmore
Latest: Jiffy
Sunday at 8:25 AM
N
Crazy Fingers
Latest: NodakBob
Saturday at 2:39 PM
It's been a good season.
Latest: grumster
Friday at 9:00 PM
Montana to cut deer tags
Latest: Kurtr
Friday at 2:03 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
SB2137
Top
Bottom