Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="luvcatchingbass" data-source="post: 276695" data-attributes="member: 1979">I would rather post our land that I choose closed versus having the government taking care of me and not giving a choice. It really isn't going to decrease my cost of posting because I am sure the Welcome Hunters will be well priced and then I have to still maintain them and if I feel lazy and decide not to maintain them I would be taking opportunities away from someone that might want to walk for birds or hunt waterfowl. I then will probably be bothered by more people looking to gain access which will begin to tire me if it is interrupting me while I'm busy. A simple NO TRESPASS sign seems to get the point across and when/if they get vandalized it is frustrating but I have found it happens just as much well out of season as it does during season, if not more. What if I have portions of land adjoining each other and I have no problems with letting people hunt part but decide across the fence I want to keep that to my personal use? That now leads to double posting which good chance something will get misunderstood then I get mad, have had enough problems when allowing a known person on and them crossing a boundary that we requested so I see it not getting better in the Welcome Hunters scenario, at least now I keep better tabs on who is out there.If government wants to infringe on landowner property rights then there could be an argument about reduced land taxes if they are unfairly deeming me not responsible enough or maybe incentives for every acre that I provide with Welcome Hunter signs.;:;popcorn</blockquote>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA