Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="KDM" data-source="post: 276701" data-attributes="member: 314">I've been wrong before, but you haven't shown that to be the case in this instance.&nbsp; The current law ALLOWS the landowner to decide to post their land closed.&nbsp; You want to change it to a law where the state decided for the landowner and FORCES landowners to post their land open.&nbsp; There is a difference.&nbsp; Why is that so hard for you to understand.&nbsp; Choose to post closed or forced to post open.&nbsp; Get it?&nbsp;&nbsp; You want MORE public land for hunters, but want LESS private land to be open to hunters by wanting all private land to be posted.&nbsp; Sounds hypocritical to me looking at it from a hunters point of view as the trespass law results in LESS land for hunters which is why it's an anti-hunting initiative and not a public safety initiative.You still haven't shown me where I've advocated for something that does the opposite of what I advocate.&nbsp; Thanks!!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="KDM, post: 276701, member: 314"] I've been wrong before, but you haven't shown that to be the case in this instance. The current law ALLOWS the landowner to decide to post their land closed. You want to change it to a law where the state decided for the landowner and FORCES landowners to post their land open. There is a difference. Why is that so hard for you to understand. Choose to post closed or forced to post open. Get it? You want MORE public land for hunters, but want LESS private land to be open to hunters by wanting all private land to be posted. Sounds hypocritical to me looking at it from a hunters point of view as the trespass law results in LESS land for hunters which is why it's an anti-hunting initiative and not a public safety initiative. You still haven't shown me where I've advocated for something that does the opposite of what I advocate. Thanks!! [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA