What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Bird Hunting
Pheasant
south dakota pheasant season extended to jan 31
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Traxion" data-source="post: 314104" data-attributes="member: 983"><p>I agree that if you're hunting Idaho it's not a good comparison. I know when I plan my OOS elk adventures I'm looking for solid populations and avoid areas that have predator issues. But I don't hunt Idaho. But, the point simply is that if you're paying for a license, folks should have the ability to check population data that is tracked by the states. Don't care if it is birds, deer, elk, or fish. Those data sets, as little as you seem to trust them, are the only comparative data we have from year to year. Withholding that from the public is wrong, just on general principle. The public owns the wildlife and pays licenses to hunt it. Withholding that information is not transparent or honest, something I expect from a government entity. And doing so to enhance revenue is even more wrong. </p><p></p><p>You are correct in that we have it good here. Especially in the NC part of the state. But, I spend a lot of time in the SC part and pheasant hunting is nearly 100% pay to play. In the small town my inlaws live near, none of the residents hunt. Why? Lodges, absentee NR landowners, and pay hunting. It's just that simple, they don't really have anywhere to hunt. It's viewed totally as a business down there, not as good local fun. A local guy might get to go in late season and hunt here or there, but for most it's road hunting or nothing. The impact of commercialized hunting is huge. </p><p></p><p>I actually think SD plays the waterfowl game about right. Maybe a bit too restrictive. But, the peak migration where EVERYONE wants to hunt is fairly short. The limit on licenses keeps that timeline from becoming a complete crapshow. This fall the ducks were packed into about 5 roosts on the east side of the state. Huge numbers but not a lot of opportunities. Smart hunters show up outside this window and have still good opportunities. Simply put, the NR waterfowl restriction keeps the peaks from becoming a mess. And the peaks seem to be later and shorter anymore.....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Traxion, post: 314104, member: 983"] I agree that if you're hunting Idaho it's not a good comparison. I know when I plan my OOS elk adventures I'm looking for solid populations and avoid areas that have predator issues. But I don't hunt Idaho. But, the point simply is that if you're paying for a license, folks should have the ability to check population data that is tracked by the states. Don't care if it is birds, deer, elk, or fish. Those data sets, as little as you seem to trust them, are the only comparative data we have from year to year. Withholding that from the public is wrong, just on general principle. The public owns the wildlife and pays licenses to hunt it. Withholding that information is not transparent or honest, something I expect from a government entity. And doing so to enhance revenue is even more wrong. You are correct in that we have it good here. Especially in the NC part of the state. But, I spend a lot of time in the SC part and pheasant hunting is nearly 100% pay to play. In the small town my inlaws live near, none of the residents hunt. Why? Lodges, absentee NR landowners, and pay hunting. It's just that simple, they don't really have anywhere to hunt. It's viewed totally as a business down there, not as good local fun. A local guy might get to go in late season and hunt here or there, but for most it's road hunting or nothing. The impact of commercialized hunting is huge. I actually think SD plays the waterfowl game about right. Maybe a bit too restrictive. But, the peak migration where EVERYONE wants to hunt is fairly short. The limit on licenses keeps that timeline from becoming a complete crapshow. This fall the ducks were packed into about 5 roosts on the east side of the state. Huge numbers but not a lot of opportunities. Smart hunters show up outside this window and have still good opportunities. Simply put, the NR waterfowl restriction keeps the peaks from becoming a mess. And the peaks seem to be later and shorter anymore..... [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Food porn
Latest: Maddog
9 minutes ago
Poor Sportsmanship
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 1:11 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Today at 12:32 AM
Sporting Clays
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 8:57 PM
New MN crappie Record
Latest: NDSportsman
Yesterday at 6:19 PM
Fishing videos
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 5:08 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 1:42 PM
Colorado Elk - Rifle
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 12:35 PM
Insanity in Oregon
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 12:47 AM
If You Can't Sleep YT
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 10:12 PM
Elon's Damascus 1911 YT
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 9:49 PM
YOUTH TAG
Latest: Coyote Hunter
Friday at 9:14 PM
Battery draw…boat question
Latest: 1lessdog
Friday at 8:14 PM
Creek Chubs
Latest: Rowdie
Friday at 3:52 PM
Oahe 26
Latest: Bullsnake
Friday at 3:30 PM
L
Dont Forget
Latest: LBrandt
Friday at 12:23 PM
Eating Nelson Lake Fish
Latest: Allen
Friday at 11:29 AM
A win for Sportsmen
Latest: 1bigfokker
Friday at 10:00 AM
Greyboe Rifle Stocks
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 9:14 PM
The Outfitters North Minot (WOW)
Latest: Duckslayer100
Thursday at 1:59 PM
Li time lithium batteries
Latest: Allen Gamble
Thursday at 11:03 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Bird Hunting
Pheasant
south dakota pheasant season extended to jan 31
Top
Bottom