What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Fishing
Fishing Forums by Species
Walleye
state record walleye
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vollmer" data-source="post: 260502" data-attributes="member: 8014"><p>(via Tom Volk)</p><p></p><p>I'm sure many don't care anymore, but here is an update on my walleye. I completed an open records request on Game and Fish for all the documents and communication surrounding my record walleye. I have been taking some time to go through it all and adding relevant evidence to my public report which will be released soon. </p><p></p><p></p><p>One document I just listened to is a voice recording from the only witness (Matthew Knuth) who gave an official statement against me. He made these statements to Game and Fish,“I’m ALMOST like 100% positive it was snagged in the tail. I didn’t put 2-and-2 together until later that day. I’m 100…like 99.5% sure it was snagged. The North Dakota state’s record PROBABLY shouldn’t be a record…I DON'T KNOW. I didn't see the hook in the fish." </p><p></p><p></p><p>Knuth himself was having doubts about what he saw and couldn't be sure. He admits he is NOT 100% sure. He stated “almost” and “probably” and “I don’t know.” These statements made by Knuth imply reasonable doubt. Why were these statements left out of the Game and Fish report?</p><p></p><p></p><p>UGH!!! I want to just scream!!! </p><p></p><p></p><p>I gave Game and Fish the benefit of the doubt on completing a neutral investigation and publishing a report with all the evidence. The more I go through the documents, the more I am realizing they treated me like I was guilty from the very beginning. The fact that they left this out of the report shows they wrote and published the report to support this guilty belief and wanted others to believe I was guilty.</p><p></p><p></p><p>All the recordings, videos, pictures, and statements will be made public along with my report. Stay tuned...</p><p></p><p></p><p>Does anyone have recommendations for a good attorney?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vollmer, post: 260502, member: 8014"] (via Tom Volk) I'm sure many don't care anymore, but here is an update on my walleye. I completed an open records request on Game and Fish for all the documents and communication surrounding my record walleye. I have been taking some time to go through it all and adding relevant evidence to my public report which will be released soon. One document I just listened to is a voice recording from the only witness (Matthew Knuth) who gave an official statement against me. He made these statements to Game and Fish,“I’m ALMOST like 100% positive it was snagged in the tail. I didn’t put 2-and-2 together until later that day. I’m 100…like 99.5% sure it was snagged. The North Dakota state’s record PROBABLY shouldn’t be a record…I DON'T KNOW. I didn't see the hook in the fish." Knuth himself was having doubts about what he saw and couldn't be sure. He admits he is NOT 100% sure. He stated “almost” and “probably” and “I don’t know.” These statements made by Knuth imply reasonable doubt. Why were these statements left out of the Game and Fish report? UGH!!! I want to just scream!!! I gave Game and Fish the benefit of the doubt on completing a neutral investigation and publishing a report with all the evidence. The more I go through the documents, the more I am realizing they treated me like I was guilty from the very beginning. The fact that they left this out of the report shows they wrote and published the report to support this guilty belief and wanted others to believe I was guilty. All the recordings, videos, pictures, and statements will be made public along with my report. Stay tuned... Does anyone have recommendations for a good attorney? [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Answer me this
Latest: Allen
Today at 2:07 AM
7
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: 701FishSlayer
Today at 1:07 AM
Presidents who added the most
Latest: grumster
Today at 12:01 AM
More CWD NE ND
Latest: grumster
Yesterday at 11:50 PM
Bismarck roads and driving
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 11:20 PM
Riddle Me This.....
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:28 PM
Quiet Pellet Gun
Latest: Captain Ahab
Yesterday at 9:47 PM
F
Drotto adjustment?
Latest: Fester
Yesterday at 8:41 PM
Check your bags boys
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:27 PM
I Love This Bar (NDA)
Latest: Zogman
Yesterday at 3:19 PM
Tractors
Latest: Davey Crockett
Yesterday at 11:15 AM
8
Spring snows 24
Latest: 870XPRS
Thursday at 10:14 PM
R
Tract Optics
Latest: rodcontrol
Thursday at 2:22 PM
S
Israel
Latest: snow2
Thursday at 10:35 AM
Any Birders here?
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 8:59 PM
Prairie ghost
Latest: johnr
Wednesday at 4:20 PM
S
Mega Live
Latest: SLE
Wednesday at 2:12 PM
G
A good movie
Latest: gillraker
Wednesday at 9:53 AM
Skinwalker Ranch
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 10:16 PM
ROBOT
Latest: Davey Crockett
Tuesday at 9:23 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Fishing
Fishing Forums by Species
Walleye
state record walleye
Top
Bottom