Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 151713" data-attributes="member: 373">While I agree with Mr Mazaheri's encouragement to get involved in the legislative process, in his imaginative reasons to oppose it, he leaves out any offer of a solution for why the trespass bill comes up. The easiest way to keep this from resurfacing every few years is to try and solve the problems that create support for it. Why not mention an amendment to raise the penalties for trespass to include loss of hunting privileges for two years? As to his concerns over the nonresident bills, I can see where a resident of Fargo that might travel out of that wasteland <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />to other areas to hunt might be concerned with other hunters that travel to hunt as well, but those rural communities that both hunters travel to to hunt most often appreciate those nonresidets that establish relationships with land owners and patronize local business owners. The legislature is suppose to work for those people from ND as well not just &quot;avid bird hunters&quot; from Fargo right? He might think about acknowledging that as well as the reality many of those folks in these rural communities look at these hunters that most often oppose these bills while supporting things like a DU initiated measure from places like Fargo (ie Little Minneapolis) as &quot;nonresidents&quot; as well.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="gst, post: 151713, member: 373"] While I agree with Mr Mazaheri's encouragement to get involved in the legislative process, in his imaginative reasons to oppose it, he leaves out any offer of a solution for why the trespass bill comes up. The easiest way to keep this from resurfacing every few years is to try and solve the problems that create support for it. Why not mention an amendment to raise the penalties for trespass to include loss of hunting privileges for two years? As to his concerns over the nonresident bills, I can see where a resident of Fargo that might travel out of that wasteland :)to other areas to hunt might be concerned with other hunters that travel to hunt as well, but those rural communities that both hunters travel to to hunt most often appreciate those nonresidets that establish relationships with land owners and patronize local business owners. The legislature is suppose to work for those people from ND as well not just "avid bird hunters" from Fargo right? He might think about acknowledging that as well as the reality many of those folks in these rural communities look at these hunters that most often oppose these bills while supporting things like a DU initiated measure from places like Fargo (ie Little Minneapolis) as "nonresidents" as well. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA