Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 219706" data-attributes="member: 373">It has been shown that managed rotational haying and grazing of CRP does benefit wildlife yet orgs like PF seem to be wanting to limit the ability to grant CFU designations that follow these rotational managed grazing guidelines. So how do we change PF agendas they are pushing in the Farm Bills?- - - Updated - - -The NWF  did file a lawsuit to change the terms of managed haying and grazing on these CRP lands. I have shared links to this action several times before. The managed rotational haying and grazing terms were changed from once every three years to once every 5 years and in some cases once every 10 years or in extreme cases not at all. <a href="https://www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA_File/353646-.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA_File/353646-.pdf</a> The "settlement" reached as a result of this lawsuit was addressed in the 2014 Farm bill absolving states of compliance with the settlement terms however producers still must comply under ongoing contracts.  The "settlement" reached as a result of this lawsuit was addressed in the 2014 Farm bill absolving states of CRP contracts also allow CFU (critical feed use" designations during drought years. Other lawsuits were aimed at changing the stipulations and abilities of the govt to implement that option by claiming NEPA studies all ready established were not extensive enough or followed to NWFs satisfaction and additional ones needed to be preformed. . <a href="http://www.fccnn.com/news/1354069-conflict-over-conservation" target="_blank">http://www.fccnn.com/news/1354069-conflict-over-conservation</a>Orgs like Delta Waterfowl have been more proactive in working WITH NRCS and farm orgs to find solutions outside the courts.- - - Updated - - -That used to be the case but with the creation of the Equal Access to Justice Act orgs like NWF and Center for Bilogical Diversity and many others have found that the tax payers pay for lawsuits meant to implement their agendas. <a href="http://www.freerangereport.com/index.php/2017/04/04/equal-access-to-justice-act-is-an-open-door-to-environmentalist-tyranny/" target="_blank">http://www.freerangereport.com/index.php/2017/04/04/equal-access-to-justice-act-is-an-open-door-to-environmentalist-tyranny/</a>Another opption<a href="https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=jleg" target="_blank">https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=jleg</a></blockquote>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA