What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
The "NEW" SB 2315 - Pucker Up Buttercup!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marbleyes" data-source="post: 248095" data-attributes="member: 675"><p>E, I think you'd be shocked at how often courthouse information is either wrong or inaccurate. I would guess onx gets their information from the tax rolls or more likely from county plat maps because there is no way they run title on all of that land. </p><p></p><p>Either way, errors are more common than you would think. Neither recorders, nor county auditors run title from the patent to present day so they are relying on the information that they "inherited" from previous recorders and auditors. It's not very hard to imagine how human error can easily happen when information was transferred from hand written records to the auditors or recorders computers to the database systems that some counties use now. One simple wrong click or incorrect typed legal description means you won't find the documents proving correct ownership recorded or entered against the legal description you are trying to follow. </p><p></p><p>It happens more often than you would think. Not to mention the fact that attorneys occasionally type the wrong legal description in deeds. I literally just ran into this scenario a week ago while running title. The attorney typed the wrong township in the legal description in two different deeds so both deeds were recorded against the incorrect legal description. I won't bore you with the details of how I stumbled upon it but it was mostly luck and some experience that triggered me to dig deeper. Anyway, if I hadn't stumbled across what I did, I would have had the wrong legal surface owner since those deeds were recorders against the wrong legal description. I have example after example of this very thing and other simple mistakes that alter record ownership of land/minerals. Needless to say, I have zero faith that the database system they are proposing would be any different.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marbleyes, post: 248095, member: 675"] E, I think you'd be shocked at how often courthouse information is either wrong or inaccurate. I would guess onx gets their information from the tax rolls or more likely from county plat maps because there is no way they run title on all of that land. Either way, errors are more common than you would think. Neither recorders, nor county auditors run title from the patent to present day so they are relying on the information that they "inherited" from previous recorders and auditors. It's not very hard to imagine how human error can easily happen when information was transferred from hand written records to the auditors or recorders computers to the database systems that some counties use now. One simple wrong click or incorrect typed legal description means you won't find the documents proving correct ownership recorded or entered against the legal description you are trying to follow. It happens more often than you would think. Not to mention the fact that attorneys occasionally type the wrong legal description in deeds. I literally just ran into this scenario a week ago while running title. The attorney typed the wrong township in the legal description in two different deeds so both deeds were recorded against the incorrect legal description. I won't bore you with the details of how I stumbled upon it but it was mostly luck and some experience that triggered me to dig deeper. Anyway, if I hadn't stumbled across what I did, I would have had the wrong legal surface owner since those deeds were recorders against the wrong legal description. I have example after example of this very thing and other simple mistakes that alter record ownership of land/minerals. Needless to say, I have zero faith that the database system they are proposing would be any different. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
T
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Tymurrey
A moment ago
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
2 minutes ago
L
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: LBrandt
Today at 2:37 AM
G
Cheaper Lithium for FFS shuttl
Latest: GSM
Yesterday at 10:30 PM
N
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: NDbowman
Yesterday at 9:02 PM
C
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: camper
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: guywhofishes
Yesterday at 5:15 PM
Wood Planer?
Latest: risingsun
Yesterday at 1:51 PM
N
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: NodakBob
Yesterday at 9:35 AM
Tire inflator
Latest: ndfinfan
Yesterday at 7:18 AM
F 150 Owners
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 5:55 AM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Rut2much
Saturday at 10:21 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 7:16 AM
Eat steak wear real fur
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 6:54 AM
P
Anyone see that one coming
Latest: PrairieGhost
Saturday at 6:42 AM
Rods From god YT
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 1:36 AM
N
Heated jackets
Latest: ndrivrrat
Friday at 5:07 PM
Seekins rifles
Latest: lunkerslayer
Friday at 4:54 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Davy Crockett
Friday at 3:58 PM
B
Ice fishing Sak
Latest: Bcblazek
Friday at 3:05 PM
Packers
Latest: Allen
Thursday at 11:43 PM
Montana Snowpack
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:45 PM
Bud Heavy
Latest: Zogman
Thursday at 8:20 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
The "NEW" SB 2315 - Pucker Up Buttercup!
Top
Bottom