What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
The "NEW" SB 2315 - Pucker Up Buttercup!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marbleyes" data-source="post: 248095" data-attributes="member: 675"><p>E, I think you'd be shocked at how often courthouse information is either wrong or inaccurate. I would guess onx gets their information from the tax rolls or more likely from county plat maps because there is no way they run title on all of that land. </p><p></p><p>Either way, errors are more common than you would think. Neither recorders, nor county auditors run title from the patent to present day so they are relying on the information that they "inherited" from previous recorders and auditors. It's not very hard to imagine how human error can easily happen when information was transferred from hand written records to the auditors or recorders computers to the database systems that some counties use now. One simple wrong click or incorrect typed legal description means you won't find the documents proving correct ownership recorded or entered against the legal description you are trying to follow. </p><p></p><p>It happens more often than you would think. Not to mention the fact that attorneys occasionally type the wrong legal description in deeds. I literally just ran into this scenario a week ago while running title. The attorney typed the wrong township in the legal description in two different deeds so both deeds were recorded against the incorrect legal description. I won't bore you with the details of how I stumbled upon it but it was mostly luck and some experience that triggered me to dig deeper. Anyway, if I hadn't stumbled across what I did, I would have had the wrong legal surface owner since those deeds were recorders against the wrong legal description. I have example after example of this very thing and other simple mistakes that alter record ownership of land/minerals. Needless to say, I have zero faith that the database system they are proposing would be any different.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marbleyes, post: 248095, member: 675"] E, I think you'd be shocked at how often courthouse information is either wrong or inaccurate. I would guess onx gets their information from the tax rolls or more likely from county plat maps because there is no way they run title on all of that land. Either way, errors are more common than you would think. Neither recorders, nor county auditors run title from the patent to present day so they are relying on the information that they "inherited" from previous recorders and auditors. It's not very hard to imagine how human error can easily happen when information was transferred from hand written records to the auditors or recorders computers to the database systems that some counties use now. One simple wrong click or incorrect typed legal description means you won't find the documents proving correct ownership recorded or entered against the legal description you are trying to follow. It happens more often than you would think. Not to mention the fact that attorneys occasionally type the wrong legal description in deeds. I literally just ran into this scenario a week ago while running title. The attorney typed the wrong township in the legal description in two different deeds so both deeds were recorded against the incorrect legal description. I won't bore you with the details of how I stumbled upon it but it was mostly luck and some experience that triggered me to dig deeper. Anyway, if I hadn't stumbled across what I did, I would have had the wrong legal surface owner since those deeds were recorders against the wrong legal description. I have example after example of this very thing and other simple mistakes that alter record ownership of land/minerals. Needless to say, I have zero faith that the database system they are proposing would be any different. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
HUMIDITY
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 12:36 AM
Yellowstone tourist again.
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 10:12 PM
***FOUND***
Latest: Honkerherms
Yesterday at 9:28 PM
Bbl Tech/Gain Twist Extreme
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:58 PM
Golden walleye
Latest: Sum1
Yesterday at 6:42 PM
MT Governors Cup 2026 results
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 6:31 PM
NWT
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 5:21 PM
Yellowstone tourist again.
Latest: shorthairsrus
Yesterday at 4:29 PM
S
BWCA closed.
Latest: scrotcaster
Yesterday at 3:44 PM
Old Lowrance
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 2:46 PM
S
Buick Enclave/Chevy Traverse?
Latest: SLE
Yesterday at 2:12 PM
S
Yellowstone tourist again.
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 2:03 PM
J
FLOCK Cameras...Thoughts
Latest: jdfisherman
Yesterday at 12:09 PM
L
Polluting ND
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 8:22 AM
"Jig" YT
Latest: svnmag
Sunday at 10:55 PM
Clear Cranks/Jerks YT
Latest: svnmag
Sunday at 8:55 PM
Willie's
Latest: svnmag
Sunday at 8:46 PM
Food porn
Latest: tikkalover
Sunday at 2:50 PM
Generation X
Latest: Rowdie
Sunday at 2:28 PM
Uncle Ted (again)
Latest: Rowdie
Sunday at 2:23 PM
Boat Ramp Play-by-Play
Latest: Rowdie
Sunday at 1:24 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
The "NEW" SB 2315 - Pucker Up Buttercup!
Top
Bottom