What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
The "NEW" SB 2315 - Pucker Up Buttercup!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marbleyes" data-source="post: 248095" data-attributes="member: 675"><p>E, I think you'd be shocked at how often courthouse information is either wrong or inaccurate. I would guess onx gets their information from the tax rolls or more likely from county plat maps because there is no way they run title on all of that land. </p><p></p><p>Either way, errors are more common than you would think. Neither recorders, nor county auditors run title from the patent to present day so they are relying on the information that they "inherited" from previous recorders and auditors. It's not very hard to imagine how human error can easily happen when information was transferred from hand written records to the auditors or recorders computers to the database systems that some counties use now. One simple wrong click or incorrect typed legal description means you won't find the documents proving correct ownership recorded or entered against the legal description you are trying to follow. </p><p></p><p>It happens more often than you would think. Not to mention the fact that attorneys occasionally type the wrong legal description in deeds. I literally just ran into this scenario a week ago while running title. The attorney typed the wrong township in the legal description in two different deeds so both deeds were recorded against the incorrect legal description. I won't bore you with the details of how I stumbled upon it but it was mostly luck and some experience that triggered me to dig deeper. Anyway, if I hadn't stumbled across what I did, I would have had the wrong legal surface owner since those deeds were recorders against the wrong legal description. I have example after example of this very thing and other simple mistakes that alter record ownership of land/minerals. Needless to say, I have zero faith that the database system they are proposing would be any different.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marbleyes, post: 248095, member: 675"] E, I think you'd be shocked at how often courthouse information is either wrong or inaccurate. I would guess onx gets their information from the tax rolls or more likely from county plat maps because there is no way they run title on all of that land. Either way, errors are more common than you would think. Neither recorders, nor county auditors run title from the patent to present day so they are relying on the information that they "inherited" from previous recorders and auditors. It's not very hard to imagine how human error can easily happen when information was transferred from hand written records to the auditors or recorders computers to the database systems that some counties use now. One simple wrong click or incorrect typed legal description means you won't find the documents proving correct ownership recorded or entered against the legal description you are trying to follow. It happens more often than you would think. Not to mention the fact that attorneys occasionally type the wrong legal description in deeds. I literally just ran into this scenario a week ago while running title. The attorney typed the wrong township in the legal description in two different deeds so both deeds were recorded against the incorrect legal description. I won't bore you with the details of how I stumbled upon it but it was mostly luck and some experience that triggered me to dig deeper. Anyway, if I hadn't stumbled across what I did, I would have had the wrong legal surface owner since those deeds were recorders against the wrong legal description. I have example after example of this very thing and other simple mistakes that alter record ownership of land/minerals. Needless to say, I have zero faith that the database system they are proposing would be any different. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Tom Hoge pro golfer from Fargo
Latest: CatDaddy
Yesterday at 9:58 PM
For Sale: 2022 G3 Bay 20GX
Latest: Captainbrad
Yesterday at 9:49 PM
Memes
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 8:35 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 8:25 PM
2137 House side
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 8:14 PM
Greeting A New Dog
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 7:52 PM
NFR in Las Vegas
Latest: tikkalover
Yesterday at 7:46 PM
Pretty Neat Trailcam Catch
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 7:18 PM
1923
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 6:41 PM
R
Metal roof or shingles?
Latest: riverview
Yesterday at 5:44 PM
R
HB 1056 Bridge over Oahe
Latest: Ruttin
Yesterday at 4:09 PM
Cell carrier
Latest: Rut2much
Yesterday at 3:52 PM
Post office rules
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 2:22 PM
Open water?
Latest: ndfinfan
Yesterday at 12:09 PM
Cheater Box
Latest: shorthairsrus
Yesterday at 6:20 AM
Garmin
Latest: buckhunter24_7
Tuesday at 9:25 PM
P
Generation X
Latest: PrairieGhost
Tuesday at 4:36 PM
NDSFC Annual Banquet April 26
Latest: Honkerherms
Tuesday at 3:39 PM
44th Bis-Man R&R Walleye Derby
Latest: Honkerherms
Tuesday at 3:38 PM
Real Estate Taxes
Latest: bravo
Tuesday at 10:42 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
The "NEW" SB 2315 - Pucker Up Buttercup!
Top
Bottom