What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
The "NEW" SB 2315 - Pucker Up Buttercup!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marbleyes" data-source="post: 248095" data-attributes="member: 675"><p>E, I think you'd be shocked at how often courthouse information is either wrong or inaccurate. I would guess onx gets their information from the tax rolls or more likely from county plat maps because there is no way they run title on all of that land. </p><p></p><p>Either way, errors are more common than you would think. Neither recorders, nor county auditors run title from the patent to present day so they are relying on the information that they "inherited" from previous recorders and auditors. It's not very hard to imagine how human error can easily happen when information was transferred from hand written records to the auditors or recorders computers to the database systems that some counties use now. One simple wrong click or incorrect typed legal description means you won't find the documents proving correct ownership recorded or entered against the legal description you are trying to follow. </p><p></p><p>It happens more often than you would think. Not to mention the fact that attorneys occasionally type the wrong legal description in deeds. I literally just ran into this scenario a week ago while running title. The attorney typed the wrong township in the legal description in two different deeds so both deeds were recorded against the incorrect legal description. I won't bore you with the details of how I stumbled upon it but it was mostly luck and some experience that triggered me to dig deeper. Anyway, if I hadn't stumbled across what I did, I would have had the wrong legal surface owner since those deeds were recorders against the wrong legal description. I have example after example of this very thing and other simple mistakes that alter record ownership of land/minerals. Needless to say, I have zero faith that the database system they are proposing would be any different.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marbleyes, post: 248095, member: 675"] E, I think you'd be shocked at how often courthouse information is either wrong or inaccurate. I would guess onx gets their information from the tax rolls or more likely from county plat maps because there is no way they run title on all of that land. Either way, errors are more common than you would think. Neither recorders, nor county auditors run title from the patent to present day so they are relying on the information that they "inherited" from previous recorders and auditors. It's not very hard to imagine how human error can easily happen when information was transferred from hand written records to the auditors or recorders computers to the database systems that some counties use now. One simple wrong click or incorrect typed legal description means you won't find the documents proving correct ownership recorded or entered against the legal description you are trying to follow. It happens more often than you would think. Not to mention the fact that attorneys occasionally type the wrong legal description in deeds. I literally just ran into this scenario a week ago while running title. The attorney typed the wrong township in the legal description in two different deeds so both deeds were recorded against the incorrect legal description. I won't bore you with the details of how I stumbled upon it but it was mostly luck and some experience that triggered me to dig deeper. Anyway, if I hadn't stumbled across what I did, I would have had the wrong legal surface owner since those deeds were recorders against the wrong legal description. I have example after example of this very thing and other simple mistakes that alter record ownership of land/minerals. Needless to say, I have zero faith that the database system they are proposing would be any different. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Food porn
Latest: SurvivalAmazon88
Today at 12:23 AM
D
Marach 29
Latest: db-2
Yesterday at 11:25 PM
Osage Orange YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:55 PM
Oahe 26
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 9:51 PM
A-29 YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:35 PM
R
Spring has sprung-
Latest: riverview
Yesterday at 6:52 PM
M
ND bighorn sheep lottery
Latest: measure-it
Yesterday at 4:46 PM
Little heart well pipe.
Latest: Allen
Yesterday at 10:59 AM
Plum Creek Canines
Latest: KDM
Yesterday at 9:33 AM
Morels
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 8:43 PM
Fargo PD
Latest: Rowdie
Friday at 6:16 PM
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: Sluggo
Friday at 5:42 PM
J
Burleigh co. Ditches debate
Latest: Johnny Five
Friday at 3:18 PM
G
POS
Latest: Grizzly Adams
Friday at 1:54 PM
Twins
Latest: Rowdie
Friday at 10:01 AM
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: lunkerslayer
Friday at 8:46 AM
Sale
Remington 788 222
Latest: shorthairsrus
Friday at 7:31 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 11:27 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Rowdie
Thursday at 9:04 PM
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: bucksnbears
Thursday at 7:31 AM
Gm
Latest: NDSportsman
Thursday at 7:20 AM
Accuracy Oil YT
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 7:49 PM
M
Contemplating a shop build
Latest: Mike Fretty
Wednesday at 5:43 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
The "NEW" SB 2315 - Pucker Up Buttercup!
Top
Bottom