What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
The "NEW" SB 2315 - Pucker Up Buttercup!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Obi-Wan" data-source="post: 248125" data-attributes="member: 709"><p>Davey you keep hanging your hat on one mans testimony that had to do with the DAPL protest which this bill would do nothing to prevent. No where does it specifically address protests on private property if that is what they are truly after. The only thing even close to it this </p><p></p><p>"An individual is guilty of a class B misdemeanor if that individual remains upon the</p><p>property of another after being requested to leave the property by a duly authorized</p><p>individual. An individual who violates this subsection is guilty of a class A</p><p>misdemeanor for the second or subsequent offense within a two-year period."</p><p></p><p>which gives them the option to leave or be cited for trespassing, which again the LEO would have a hard time proving that everyone heard the request to leave the property. </p><p></p><p>This bill is clearly aimed at the hunters. The word hunt, hunts, hunters, hunting, along with other forms of the word hunt is used 54 times</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Obi-Wan, post: 248125, member: 709"] Davey you keep hanging your hat on one mans testimony that had to do with the DAPL protest which this bill would do nothing to prevent. No where does it specifically address protests on private property if that is what they are truly after. The only thing even close to it this "An individual is guilty of a class B misdemeanor if that individual remains upon the property of another after being requested to leave the property by a duly authorized individual. An individual who violates this subsection is guilty of a class A misdemeanor for the second or subsequent offense within a two-year period." which gives them the option to leave or be cited for trespassing, which again the LEO would have a hard time proving that everyone heard the request to leave the property. This bill is clearly aimed at the hunters. The word hunt, hunts, hunters, hunting, along with other forms of the word hunt is used 54 times [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Tom Hoge pro golfer from Fargo
Latest: CatDaddy
Yesterday at 9:58 PM
For Sale: 2022 G3 Bay 20GX
Latest: Captainbrad
Yesterday at 9:49 PM
Memes
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 8:35 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 8:25 PM
2137 House side
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 8:14 PM
Greeting A New Dog
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 7:52 PM
NFR in Las Vegas
Latest: tikkalover
Yesterday at 7:46 PM
Pretty Neat Trailcam Catch
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 7:18 PM
1923
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 6:41 PM
R
Metal roof or shingles?
Latest: riverview
Yesterday at 5:44 PM
R
HB 1056 Bridge over Oahe
Latest: Ruttin
Yesterday at 4:09 PM
Cell carrier
Latest: Rut2much
Yesterday at 3:52 PM
Post office rules
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 2:22 PM
Open water?
Latest: ndfinfan
Yesterday at 12:09 PM
Cheater Box
Latest: shorthairsrus
Yesterday at 6:20 AM
Garmin
Latest: buckhunter24_7
Tuesday at 9:25 PM
P
Generation X
Latest: PrairieGhost
Tuesday at 4:36 PM
NDSFC Annual Banquet April 26
Latest: Honkerherms
Tuesday at 3:39 PM
44th Bis-Man R&R Walleye Derby
Latest: Honkerherms
Tuesday at 3:38 PM
Real Estate Taxes
Latest: bravo
Tuesday at 10:42 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
The "NEW" SB 2315 - Pucker Up Buttercup!
Top
Bottom