If this is a trespass/ landowner bill shouldn't it come out of agriculture? Maybe if it's such a great idea landowners should pay for it. I was thinking about free signs myself, but if we get right down to this trespass thing and all the trouble with DAPL we didn't cause that. Why all the hunter language in this bill?
Three four couples get together nearly every Friday night and go to a different restaurant in town or even to somewhere else in North Dakota. One of my good friends is an insurance adjuster. I was disappointed at some of the stories he believes. Last night he told me that the majority of landowners get hunters driving through their unharvested fields, in 4X4 and cutting cookies all over their unharvested fields. I don't believe it. For one thing how many fields are unharvested during a hunting season. No one in their right mind is going to drive through corn, sunflowers, or beans. Wheat and small grains are harvested. Why do people tell and repeat such crap? It's still bugging me today. I think crap is made up by people like the ones that want this bill. They tell crazy stories to get what they want.
I guess what angers me is they always assume it's hunters. If there is a new hole in a rural stop sign in April they say hunters shot it. No they didn't a vandal misusing a gun did it. Tracks across a field they think is hunters. I live in the country and have reported local kids on their 4x4 riping up beans in July. I wish people would more often use the brains God gave them.