What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
The "NEW" SB 2315 - Pucker Up Buttercup!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dank" data-source="post: 248253" data-attributes="member: 2945"><p>No manifestos and had to even google the word "fatalistic". Just a reflection of what my experiences of hunting this state and other states has been over the last 25 years. If the desire to hop out of a vehicle in order to shoot a coyote, deer, duck, pheasant, or squirrel is more important than showing some basic courtesy to landowners then we shall agree to disagree. If you wish to continue to place the burden of action on those providing access rather than on those requesting it, we shall agree to disagree. If you believe that these changes will forever destroy our hunting heritage, again... agree to disagree. </p><p></p><p>I respect the heck out you KDM. I know you are an active member of the outdoor community and I get the sense you do things for the "right reasons". I'm certainly not an agent of the NDFB or ND Stockmens and if you were to look back at my posting history you'd see that a lot of what I have posted on this site is to refute the "half-truths" and biased commentary from gst and others who like to spin the reality of ag for their benefit. </p><p></p><p>I can understand resistance to such a change but I'd argue that things have already changed. Access is much less available now versus 20 years ago. Habitat more sparse than it has been in the recent past. Government spending on conservation programs is harder and harder to come by. If you are in an area that has decent habitat for any notable game, then in all likelihood it's all but posted up anyway. Sportsmen are already being forced to do more research, make more phone calls, and spend more time for due diligence in order to have a successful hunt. For sportsman to throw out the "compromise" of giving their approval for all private lands isn't much of a compromise at all since most of the places I hunt in ND are 80%+ posted anyway.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dank, post: 248253, member: 2945"] No manifestos and had to even google the word "fatalistic". Just a reflection of what my experiences of hunting this state and other states has been over the last 25 years. If the desire to hop out of a vehicle in order to shoot a coyote, deer, duck, pheasant, or squirrel is more important than showing some basic courtesy to landowners then we shall agree to disagree. If you wish to continue to place the burden of action on those providing access rather than on those requesting it, we shall agree to disagree. If you believe that these changes will forever destroy our hunting heritage, again... agree to disagree. I respect the heck out you KDM. I know you are an active member of the outdoor community and I get the sense you do things for the "right reasons". I'm certainly not an agent of the NDFB or ND Stockmens and if you were to look back at my posting history you'd see that a lot of what I have posted on this site is to refute the "half-truths" and biased commentary from gst and others who like to spin the reality of ag for their benefit. I can understand resistance to such a change but I'd argue that things have already changed. Access is much less available now versus 20 years ago. Habitat more sparse than it has been in the recent past. Government spending on conservation programs is harder and harder to come by. If you are in an area that has decent habitat for any notable game, then in all likelihood it's all but posted up anyway. Sportsmen are already being forced to do more research, make more phone calls, and spend more time for due diligence in order to have a successful hunt. For sportsman to throw out the "compromise" of giving their approval for all private lands isn't much of a compromise at all since most of the places I hunt in ND are 80%+ posted anyway. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
BEST Music Vid...
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:29 PM
Preserving Spool Depth
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:10 PM
Oahe report Mobridge
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 9:49 PM
Morel mushrooms
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:48 PM
Ruger Mark III
Latest: Zogman
Yesterday at 5:27 PM
S
Costa Rica Bill fishing
Latest: SLE
Yesterday at 2:44 PM
M
RR
Red River 5-22-24
Latest: measure-it
Yesterday at 12:30 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 12:11 PM
Ticks
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 12:02 PM
Texas Aoudad
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 10:24 AM
This is what its all about
Latest: Achucker
Yesterday at 7:14 AM
F
"Conspiracy Theory" or not?
Latest: Fester
Tuesday at 9:42 PM
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: tikkalover
Tuesday at 4:37 PM
.357 VS 10mm
Latest: grumster
Tuesday at 3:28 PM
Howdy from Grand Forks, ND
Latest: espringers
Tuesday at 12:02 PM
Queens Ann and Nancy Wilson
Latest: svnmag
Monday at 9:46 PM
Craftsman 5000-Watt Generator
Latest: Mr.Mike
Monday at 7:58 PM
Project ideas for a 13yo
Latest: Wirehair
Monday at 8:41 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Sunday at 10:32 PM
Weather forecast & predictions
Latest: CatDaddy
Sunday at 10:20 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
The "NEW" SB 2315 - Pucker Up Buttercup!
Top
Bottom