Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 60935" data-attributes="member: 373">We hear this claim quite a bit. And before anyone goes all plainsman here, indeed wild life is a public resource. But why is it the public then is only concerned with their &quot;resource&quot; when they want to make use of it during for say the deer gun season 17 1/2 days? If you approach this process with this kind of mentality you really are not many steps above the landowner that believes because the wildlife is on their land it is &quot;their resource&quot;. Believe it or not there are costs associated with these &quot;resources&quot; being on the lands when they are mismanaged. If one of &quot;my resources&quot; gets out of the pasture and eats someone elses grain, I am responsible for those damages. How many of those people running with the &quot;my resources&quot; argument for access actually take responsibility for &quot;their resources&quot; impacts on that landowners property or livlihood?&nbsp; I had to settle up with a neighbor for cattle that got out into his crop after a moose ran thru our fence and broke some wires. (moose hair caught in the barbs two different places where the fence was broke told the story) so Lab hunter, want to pony up for the damage &quot;your resource&quot; cost me? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />I really don;t have a problem with things the way they are............until people/orgs.&nbsp; start to push things. &nbsp;I have brought up block management programs like Mt's at G&amp;F advisory meetings and they have been shot down every time by the big wigs at NDG&amp;F. No real actual legitimate reason.- - - Updated - - -ND nice works.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="gst, post: 60935, member: 373"] We hear this claim quite a bit. And before anyone goes all plainsman here, indeed wild life is a public resource. But why is it the public then is only concerned with their "resource" when they want to make use of it during for say the deer gun season 17 1/2 days? If you approach this process with this kind of mentality you really are not many steps above the landowner that believes because the wildlife is on their land it is "their resource". Believe it or not there are costs associated with these "resources" being on the lands when they are mismanaged. If one of "my resources" gets out of the pasture and eats someone elses grain, I am responsible for those damages. How many of those people running with the "my resources" argument for access actually take responsibility for "their resources" impacts on that landowners property or livlihood? I had to settle up with a neighbor for cattle that got out into his crop after a moose ran thru our fence and broke some wires. (moose hair caught in the barbs two different places where the fence was broke told the story) so Lab hunter, want to pony up for the damage "your resource" cost me? :) I really don;t have a problem with things the way they are............until people/orgs. start to push things. I have brought up block management programs like Mt's at G&F advisory meetings and they have been shot down every time by the big wigs at NDG&F. No real actual legitimate reason. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] ND nice works. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA