Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="labhunter66" data-source="post: 60967" data-attributes="member: 1365">- - - Updated - - -- - - Updated - - -Ah Lab hunter, you must have missed the part of the post were I said "before someone goes all plainsman on me"............<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />You have watched Bruce and my discussion over on Nodak enough to realize what you have paid in your portion of a govt payment to "me" so the govt can control private lands in your life time would not amount to what damage that one moose caused. And besides as I asked, what does this govt's cheap food policy have to do with "your resource" causing damages? No big deal, it is all part of what we deal with when we choose to farm or ranch.  I just get a kick out of these fellas that claim wildlife is "their resource" that would likely be the loudest one squacking if my "resources" wandered into town and ate their petunias. North Dakota spends a fair bit on plots. If they ran it like Mt.s program both parties would be better off. landowner enrolls better lands, more people hunt it, worth more to enroll. They enroll barren pasture grazed down to the dirt, no one hunts, they do not get paid. People that have to sign in tend to remember to shut gates and pick up trash.</blockquote>[/QUOTE]GST, you were the one that opened the payment door when you asked if I wanted to pay for the resource damage you sustain.  My point is that as a society people receive support in different ways.  It's easy to point out others benefits and look the other way when it comes to something affecting ourselves.  Not once have I advocated for pulling into someone's yard demanding access to "our resource".  All I've said it that if someone want's to deny access to that resource I don't think it's too much to ask to put up a no hunting sign.  If the law changed it wouldn't affect me much.  I do hunt some unposted private land but I'm sure I could get permission if needed.  The vast majority of what I hunt is public land or posted private land that I already have permission on.  The original questions didn't have anything to do with how a law change would affect me personally it simply asked if permission should be required on all private land.  I don't see any need to change the current system so no, I don't think permission should be required.  Simple as that.[/QUOTE]

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA