Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 60974" data-attributes="member: 373"></blockquote>GST, you were the one that opened the payment door when you asked if I wanted to pay for the resource damage you sustain.  My point is that as a society people receive support in different ways.  It's easy to point out others benefits and look the other way when it comes to something affecting ourselves.  Not once have I advocated for pulling into someone's yard demanding access to "our resource".  All I've said it that if someone want's to deny access to that resource I don't think it's too much to ask to put up a no hunting sign.  If the law changed it wouldn't affect me much.  I do hunt some unposted private land but I'm sure I could get permission if needed.  The vast majority of what I hunt is public land or posted private land that I already have permission on.  The original questions didn't have anything to do with how a law change would affect me personally it simply asked if permission should be required on all private land.  I don't see any need to change the current system so no, I don't think permission should be required.  Simple as that.[/QUOTE]Okay I know I shouldn;t but my curiousity gets the better of me. labhunter, explain to us the connection between a farm program payment which the govt is required to pay when the "take" the ability to use private lands that is part of a Federal cheap food policy and damage that wildlife do? I am curious how you think that "opened the door". I mentioned the conversations old plainsman and I had you likely watched over on Nodak so you would stop and think about the return on investment your "farm subsidy payments" provide you in the grocery store. If you do not like this nations cheap food policy take it up with your representatives. But please elaborate on how that connects to wildlife damage.- - - Updated - - -So guywhoneedsaffirmationofanapology it would appear that I did in fact admit i mis spoke. "Ah, guywhosmilessmuglyandassumesanapologyisrequired, indeed someone was talking about feeding animals." But, so as not to offend ones tender sensibilities on an internet site, My apologies to you for mis speaking guywhofishes, I did not take the time to reread the posts in the thread and indeed mis spoke. I am truly ashamed that I committed this aggregious error and will try harder in the future to to not mis speak. Please allow me ot move on from this terrible mistake asking your forgiveness and mercy.  Now, no need to cross any bridge, just explain your animals live on pixie dust theory a little better.- - - Updated - - -Oh guywhowhineslikeliberalbob, I just find a bit of amusement in some of your posts that tend to jumpstart the sarcasm response. If you truly think I am "picking on you", perhaps knowing under those liberal standards I "pick on" other "western landowners" as well will ease your sensibilites. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />[/QUOTE]

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA