What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
US fish and Wildlife Service
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KDM" data-source="post: 445943" data-attributes="member: 314"><p>I'm sorry for the folks that lost their jobs, but follow the money. The usfws only has influence on about 4% of North Dakota land. According to my research, the usfws controls 289,000 acres of land and about 1.5 million acres of perpetual and limited easements in ND. It's probably easy to justify the fisheries end of the budget. The hatcheries and such where the fish are used nationwide so to speak. However, justifying the staff and overhead for programs that affect only 4% of the land I would guess is a bit more difficult. I don't know what the usfws budget is for ND, but I can't help but wonder what money is left for actual conservation programs after you pay salaries, electric bills, rents, fuels, transportation, and the other overhead costs given the 420k annual rent for one building. My guess the bang for their buck in ND is fairly dismal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KDM, post: 445943, member: 314"] I'm sorry for the folks that lost their jobs, but follow the money. The usfws only has influence on about 4% of North Dakota land. According to my research, the usfws controls 289,000 acres of land and about 1.5 million acres of perpetual and limited easements in ND. It's probably easy to justify the fisheries end of the budget. The hatcheries and such where the fish are used nationwide so to speak. However, justifying the staff and overhead for programs that affect only 4% of the land I would guess is a bit more difficult. I don't know what the usfws budget is for ND, but I can't help but wonder what money is left for actual conservation programs after you pay salaries, electric bills, rents, fuels, transportation, and the other overhead costs given the 420k annual rent for one building. My guess the bang for their buck in ND is fairly dismal. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
US fish and Wildlife Service
Latest: Fritz the Cat
11 minutes ago
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Maddog
26 minutes ago
L
Spring Snows
Latest: LBrandt
Today at 12:58 PM
*Early* Open water watch 2025?
Latest: Allen
Today at 12:09 PM
F
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Fester
Today at 12:06 PM
N
HB 1598
Latest: ndlongshot
Today at 11:40 AM
W
River
Latest: Wall-eyes
Today at 11:32 AM
Reel Into the Spool?...
Latest: risingsun
Today at 9:08 AM
Li time lithium batteries
Latest: 5575
Today at 5:40 AM
M
Deal Alert!
Latest: Migrator Man
Yesterday at 8:01 PM
F
Bis to lose boat ramp
Latest: Fester
Yesterday at 6:03 PM
Pit Cooking Meat
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 10:37 AM
R
SB 2309 Youth Muley Doe
Latest: Ruttin
Wednesday at 9:57 PM
Memes
Latest: lunkerslayer
Wednesday at 9:54 PM
J
Glacier Ice house
Latest: jdfisherman
Wednesday at 2:20 PM
R
Dog Food Question. lol
Latest: riverview
Wednesday at 8:33 AM
R
Getting into Canada
Latest: riverview
Tuesday at 10:15 PM
Iditarod 2019 sled dog race to Nome Alaska
Latest: 3Roosters
Tuesday at 9:32 PM
Security Cameras
Latest: Sluggo
Tuesday at 9:14 PM
March 29
Latest: Jiffy
Tuesday at 3:54 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
US fish and Wildlife Service
Top
Bottom