What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Water from the Great Lakes or Pacific NW
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Allen" data-source="post: 50730" data-attributes="member: 389"><p>Yes, West Fargo does get water from wells. The problem here though is that what is generally called the West Fargo Aquifer (it's broken down into a few different aquifers that kind of behave individually) is buried under 60-90 ft of clay. So this aquifer system is essentially a buried remnant of sands left over from the glaciation and Lake Agassiz times. Being buried under all of that clay leaves recharge to be an almost non-player in water availability. Thus, the water that is in the West Fargo Aquifer system is essentially a bank account with no income and a lot of outgo. </p><p></p><p>At this point it is foolish to continue to regularly use the WF aquifer since it's water levels just continue to fall. It should probably be left as a reserve/backup to a surface water supply (the Sheyenne River). The problem with doing that is we generally use different water treatment techniques for surface water versus groundwater.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's been looked at, but if you've been to the RRV, one of the first things that kind of grabs your attention is just how flat of a "valley" it really is. So where exactly would a person build a new water supply reservoir of any size? One of the possible solutions for a water supply feature was to build a large retention structure through excavation in the Fargo area. The problem with this solution was one of water quality. Any feature like this would be relatively shallow and go through substantial evaporative concentration of naturally occurring salts and contaminants.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Another water supply concept was one I lovingly called the re-flush. It was a pipeline that would take RR water from somewhere north of Grand Forks and transport it back to either the Sheyenne, or the Fargo area. Expensive, yes. Would it work, yes. Do people like their water supply coming from downstream of their sanitary sewers, not so much.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Allen, post: 50730, member: 389"] Yes, West Fargo does get water from wells. The problem here though is that what is generally called the West Fargo Aquifer (it's broken down into a few different aquifers that kind of behave individually) is buried under 60-90 ft of clay. So this aquifer system is essentially a buried remnant of sands left over from the glaciation and Lake Agassiz times. Being buried under all of that clay leaves recharge to be an almost non-player in water availability. Thus, the water that is in the West Fargo Aquifer system is essentially a bank account with no income and a lot of outgo. At this point it is foolish to continue to regularly use the WF aquifer since it's water levels just continue to fall. It should probably be left as a reserve/backup to a surface water supply (the Sheyenne River). The problem with doing that is we generally use different water treatment techniques for surface water versus groundwater. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] It's been looked at, but if you've been to the RRV, one of the first things that kind of grabs your attention is just how flat of a "valley" it really is. So where exactly would a person build a new water supply reservoir of any size? One of the possible solutions for a water supply feature was to build a large retention structure through excavation in the Fargo area. The problem with this solution was one of water quality. Any feature like this would be relatively shallow and go through substantial evaporative concentration of naturally occurring salts and contaminants. Another water supply concept was one I lovingly called the re-flush. It was a pipeline that would take RR water from somewhere north of Grand Forks and transport it back to either the Sheyenne, or the Fargo area. Expensive, yes. Would it work, yes. Do people like their water supply coming from downstream of their sanitary sewers, not so much. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
S
Batten down the hatches!
Latest: snow2
2 minutes ago
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Kurtr
5 minutes ago
Outdoor photo request
Latest: Rowdie
34 minutes ago
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
41 minutes ago
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 7:11 AM
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: risingsun
Today at 6:33 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 6:27 AM
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 11:32 PM
Satellite Internet
Latest: grantfurness
Yesterday at 10:11 PM
R
Any ice reports?
Latest: riverview
Yesterday at 9:25 PM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 7:57 PM
F
Property Tax Credit
Latest: Fester
Yesterday at 7:33 PM
Alkaline lake ice conditions?
Latest: NDSportsman
Yesterday at 2:55 PM
N
ION gen2 8"
Latest: ndrivrrat
Tuesday at 5:43 PM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:51 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:43 PM
Wolves at J Clark Sawyer
Latest: Davy Crockett
Tuesday at 11:08 AM
W
Which one you did this?
Latest: walleyeman_1875
Monday at 12:17 PM
S
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: snow2
Sunday at 9:46 AM
Deer speeds.
Latest: Kurtr
Sunday at 9:08 AM
6.5 Creedmore
Latest: Jiffy
Sunday at 8:25 AM
N
Crazy Fingers
Latest: NodakBob
Saturday at 2:39 PM
It's been a good season.
Latest: grumster
Friday at 9:00 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Water from the Great Lakes or Pacific NW
Top
Bottom