What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Water from the Great Lakes or Pacific NW
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Allen" data-source="post: 50730" data-attributes="member: 389"><p>Yes, West Fargo does get water from wells. The problem here though is that what is generally called the West Fargo Aquifer (it's broken down into a few different aquifers that kind of behave individually) is buried under 60-90 ft of clay. So this aquifer system is essentially a buried remnant of sands left over from the glaciation and Lake Agassiz times. Being buried under all of that clay leaves recharge to be an almost non-player in water availability. Thus, the water that is in the West Fargo Aquifer system is essentially a bank account with no income and a lot of outgo. </p><p></p><p>At this point it is foolish to continue to regularly use the WF aquifer since it's water levels just continue to fall. It should probably be left as a reserve/backup to a surface water supply (the Sheyenne River). The problem with doing that is we generally use different water treatment techniques for surface water versus groundwater.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's been looked at, but if you've been to the RRV, one of the first things that kind of grabs your attention is just how flat of a "valley" it really is. So where exactly would a person build a new water supply reservoir of any size? One of the possible solutions for a water supply feature was to build a large retention structure through excavation in the Fargo area. The problem with this solution was one of water quality. Any feature like this would be relatively shallow and go through substantial evaporative concentration of naturally occurring salts and contaminants.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Another water supply concept was one I lovingly called the re-flush. It was a pipeline that would take RR water from somewhere north of Grand Forks and transport it back to either the Sheyenne, or the Fargo area. Expensive, yes. Would it work, yes. Do people like their water supply coming from downstream of their sanitary sewers, not so much.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Allen, post: 50730, member: 389"] Yes, West Fargo does get water from wells. The problem here though is that what is generally called the West Fargo Aquifer (it's broken down into a few different aquifers that kind of behave individually) is buried under 60-90 ft of clay. So this aquifer system is essentially a buried remnant of sands left over from the glaciation and Lake Agassiz times. Being buried under all of that clay leaves recharge to be an almost non-player in water availability. Thus, the water that is in the West Fargo Aquifer system is essentially a bank account with no income and a lot of outgo. At this point it is foolish to continue to regularly use the WF aquifer since it's water levels just continue to fall. It should probably be left as a reserve/backup to a surface water supply (the Sheyenne River). The problem with doing that is we generally use different water treatment techniques for surface water versus groundwater. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] It's been looked at, but if you've been to the RRV, one of the first things that kind of grabs your attention is just how flat of a "valley" it really is. So where exactly would a person build a new water supply reservoir of any size? One of the possible solutions for a water supply feature was to build a large retention structure through excavation in the Fargo area. The problem with this solution was one of water quality. Any feature like this would be relatively shallow and go through substantial evaporative concentration of naturally occurring salts and contaminants. Another water supply concept was one I lovingly called the re-flush. It was a pipeline that would take RR water from somewhere north of Grand Forks and transport it back to either the Sheyenne, or the Fargo area. Expensive, yes. Would it work, yes. Do people like their water supply coming from downstream of their sanitary sewers, not so much. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Boat Ramp Play-by-Play
Latest: Rowdie
16 minutes ago
L
Wanted!! 24v Terrova
Latest: limit2winit
27 minutes ago
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: Allen
46 minutes ago
Walleye length limits on big 3
Latest: johnr
Today at 10:11 AM
ND Bighorn Population
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 9:58 AM
L
Mother Nature's Drunk....
Latest: LBrandt
Today at 8:18 AM
Spring has sprung-
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Today at 7:48 AM
Twins
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Today at 6:30 AM
M70 YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:30 PM
Happy Easter!
Latest: ndfinfan
Yesterday at 7:42 PM
Food porn
Latest: SurvivalAmazon88
Yesterday at 3:08 PM
Walkin and thinkin
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 8:31 PM
Syrups YT 23min (Box Elder?!)
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 8:24 PM
Mozambique Rock/Surf
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 7:36 PM
T
ND Mushrooms
Latest: Twitch
Saturday at 1:35 PM
Burleigh co. Ditches debate
Latest: Fritz the Cat
Saturday at 1:00 PM
A
Ice angler cheats
Latest: Auggie
Friday at 9:01 PM
Li time lithium batteries
Latest: wslayer
Friday at 5:56 PM
T
Sled auger mount
Latest: Travis wood outdoors
Friday at 9:30 AM
Spring snows 26
Latest: Maddog
Friday at 8:17 AM
ND Otters?
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 11:00 PM
CO2 Climate Scam
Latest: Rowdie
Thursday at 10:00 PM
Gilly YT
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 8:40 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Water from the Great Lakes or Pacific NW
Top
Bottom