What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Well this is going to get interesting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tikkalover" data-source="post: 123812" data-attributes="member: 600"><p>Why can't these people just move on with life!!!!!!!!</p><p></p><p><strong>Standing Rock Sioux tribe challenges Corps findings on Dakota Access pipeline</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong>The Standing Rock Sioux tribe, which is leading a four-tribe lawsuit against the four-state pipeline built by Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners, in court documents filed Thursday asked a federal judge to reject the findings.</p><p>“The corps has conducted a sham process to arrive at a sham conclusion, for the second time,” tribal Chairman Mike Faith said in a statement.</p><p>The pipeline has the capacity to move half of the oil produced daily in North Dakota, the nation’s second-leading producer behind Texas. It passes just north of the Standing Rock Reservation, beneath a Missouri River reservoir that is the tribe’s water source.</p><p>The pipeline has been moving North Dakota oil through South Dakota and Iowa to a shipping point in Illinois since June 2017. That same month, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ruled that the Corps largely complied with environmental law when permitting the pipeline but needed to do more study of its impact to tribal rights. The Corps filed its work with the court in late August.</p><p></p><p> </p><p>Standing Rock’s challenge says the Corps “failed to grapple with extensive technical input provided by the tribe and others undermining its conclusions.” The major example the tribe offered is information it says shows the Corps has underestimated the risk and impact of an oil spill.</p><p>The tribe continues to maintain that the only lawful way to resolve the matter would be through a full environmental study that includes consideration of route alternatives.</p><p>The Corps had planned to do a more extensive environmental study before President Donald Trump took office in January 2017 and pushed through completion of the stalled project. The agency said in court documents in August that the additional study concluded a more thorough review is unwarranted. The tribe asks Boasberg to reject that conclusion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tikkalover, post: 123812, member: 600"] Why can't these people just move on with life!!!!!!!! [B]Standing Rock Sioux tribe challenges Corps findings on Dakota Access pipeline [/B]The Standing Rock Sioux tribe, which is leading a four-tribe lawsuit against the four-state pipeline built by Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners, in court documents filed Thursday asked a federal judge to reject the findings. “The corps has conducted a sham process to arrive at a sham conclusion, for the second time,” tribal Chairman Mike Faith said in a statement. The pipeline has the capacity to move half of the oil produced daily in North Dakota, the nation’s second-leading producer behind Texas. It passes just north of the Standing Rock Reservation, beneath a Missouri River reservoir that is the tribe’s water source. The pipeline has been moving North Dakota oil through South Dakota and Iowa to a shipping point in Illinois since June 2017. That same month, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ruled that the Corps largely complied with environmental law when permitting the pipeline but needed to do more study of its impact to tribal rights. The Corps filed its work with the court in late August. Standing Rock’s challenge says the Corps “failed to grapple with extensive technical input provided by the tribe and others undermining its conclusions.” The major example the tribe offered is information it says shows the Corps has underestimated the risk and impact of an oil spill. The tribe continues to maintain that the only lawful way to resolve the matter would be through a full environmental study that includes consideration of route alternatives. The Corps had planned to do a more extensive environmental study before President Donald Trump took office in January 2017 and pushed through completion of the stalled project. The agency said in court documents in August that the additional study concluded a more thorough review is unwarranted. The tribe asks Boasberg to reject that conclusion. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
drought... cough cough
Latest: Rowdie
1 minute ago
Whitetail Statewide Tag
Latest: NDSportsman
32 minutes ago
C
Mandan Data center pushback
Latest: camper
Today at 4:40 PM
N
Pronghorn
Latest: ndbwhunter
Today at 4:03 PM
FLOCK Cameras...Thoughts
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 3:09 PM
Twins
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Today at 12:37 PM
Your dream squirrel rifle?
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Today at 12:11 PM
W
New Pup
Latest: westwolfone
Today at 12:02 PM
Movies
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Today at 10:48 AM
`/*%$ taxes
Latest: tikkalover
Today at 9:48 AM
The last dance
Latest: BrokenBackJack
Today at 9:22 AM
RR
Red River 8-13-26
Latest: Captainbrad
Today at 9:02 AM
M
Tailrace
Latest: measure-it
Today at 8:26 AM
Worth watching atleast once
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 11:55 PM
Teachers
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 10:45 PM
Walleye tour sodak.
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 2:11 PM
Generation X
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 12:37 PM
Algoma, Wisc. anyone?
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 9:31 AM
C
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: camper
Tuesday at 8:30 PM
After a Self Defense Shooting
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 1:09 AM
Stupid
Latest: svnmag
Monday at 11:40 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Well this is going to get interesting
Top
Bottom