What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Well this is going to get interesting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tikkalover" data-source="post: 123812" data-attributes="member: 600"><p>Why can't these people just move on with life!!!!!!!!</p><p></p><p><strong>Standing Rock Sioux tribe challenges Corps findings on Dakota Access pipeline</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong>The Standing Rock Sioux tribe, which is leading a four-tribe lawsuit against the four-state pipeline built by Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners, in court documents filed Thursday asked a federal judge to reject the findings.</p><p>“The corps has conducted a sham process to arrive at a sham conclusion, for the second time,” tribal Chairman Mike Faith said in a statement.</p><p>The pipeline has the capacity to move half of the oil produced daily in North Dakota, the nation’s second-leading producer behind Texas. It passes just north of the Standing Rock Reservation, beneath a Missouri River reservoir that is the tribe’s water source.</p><p>The pipeline has been moving North Dakota oil through South Dakota and Iowa to a shipping point in Illinois since June 2017. That same month, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ruled that the Corps largely complied with environmental law when permitting the pipeline but needed to do more study of its impact to tribal rights. The Corps filed its work with the court in late August.</p><p></p><p> </p><p>Standing Rock’s challenge says the Corps “failed to grapple with extensive technical input provided by the tribe and others undermining its conclusions.” The major example the tribe offered is information it says shows the Corps has underestimated the risk and impact of an oil spill.</p><p>The tribe continues to maintain that the only lawful way to resolve the matter would be through a full environmental study that includes consideration of route alternatives.</p><p>The Corps had planned to do a more extensive environmental study before President Donald Trump took office in January 2017 and pushed through completion of the stalled project. The agency said in court documents in August that the additional study concluded a more thorough review is unwarranted. The tribe asks Boasberg to reject that conclusion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tikkalover, post: 123812, member: 600"] Why can't these people just move on with life!!!!!!!! [B]Standing Rock Sioux tribe challenges Corps findings on Dakota Access pipeline [/B]The Standing Rock Sioux tribe, which is leading a four-tribe lawsuit against the four-state pipeline built by Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners, in court documents filed Thursday asked a federal judge to reject the findings. “The corps has conducted a sham process to arrive at a sham conclusion, for the second time,” tribal Chairman Mike Faith said in a statement. The pipeline has the capacity to move half of the oil produced daily in North Dakota, the nation’s second-leading producer behind Texas. It passes just north of the Standing Rock Reservation, beneath a Missouri River reservoir that is the tribe’s water source. The pipeline has been moving North Dakota oil through South Dakota and Iowa to a shipping point in Illinois since June 2017. That same month, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ruled that the Corps largely complied with environmental law when permitting the pipeline but needed to do more study of its impact to tribal rights. The Corps filed its work with the court in late August. Standing Rock’s challenge says the Corps “failed to grapple with extensive technical input provided by the tribe and others undermining its conclusions.” The major example the tribe offered is information it says shows the Corps has underestimated the risk and impact of an oil spill. The tribe continues to maintain that the only lawful way to resolve the matter would be through a full environmental study that includes consideration of route alternatives. The Corps had planned to do a more extensive environmental study before President Donald Trump took office in January 2017 and pushed through completion of the stalled project. The agency said in court documents in August that the additional study concluded a more thorough review is unwarranted. The tribe asks Boasberg to reject that conclusion. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Health Care Cost
Latest: Obi-Wan
25 minutes ago
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: Kurtr
32 minutes ago
Wood Stoves
Latest: KDM
Today at 9:25 AM
T
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Twitch
Today at 8:14 AM
Western ND river ice
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 8:00 AM
C
NDSU to the FBS???
Latest: camper
Today at 6:25 AM
Marijuana News Tidbits
Latest: 1bigfokker
Today at 12:12 AM
Hobby
Latest: grantfurness
Yesterday at 11:54 PM
Concealed carry
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:40 PM
Customer service
Latest: jr2280
Yesterday at 10:17 PM
Catfish anyone?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:15 PM
Generation X
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 5:04 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 4:47 PM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 3:28 PM
T
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Traxion
Yesterday at 2:12 PM
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 9:30 AM
A
Bitcoin
Latest: Auggie
Yesterday at 6:25 AM
CCI Uppercut JHP ammo?
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:31 PM
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 8:29 PM
Outdoor photo request
Latest: Maddog
Thursday at 5:42 PM
ICE Fishing videos
Latest: tikkalover
Thursday at 3:24 PM
ND concealed Weapons Permit
Latest: Maddog
Wednesday at 6:45 PM
Heated jackets
Latest: wslayer
Wednesday at 4:36 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Well this is going to get interesting
Top
Bottom