Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 152332" data-attributes="member: 373">$12,000 sled and doing it in a &quot;cruel&quot; manner.............maybe there are &quot;dumbasses&quot; out thereIndeed far &quot;crueler&quot; than being chased down by a plane. Seeing a baby calf being eaten alive is I guess not &quot;cruel&quot;............ya ya I know, natures way of doing things. The difference between us and the coyote is us humans choose what is an &quot;ethical&quot; way to kill something. (at least most of us do) (but then again in some other humans eyes we do not, so are they right? ) But then we justify our ethical stance by saying when the govt does something it is not &quot;hunting&quot; but &quot;population control&quot; so it is alright, even though if we honestly look at it hunting is population control. If most people were honest they would admit they did not care about maintaining a managable population of coyotes, or the impact an unmanaged population has (until they impact their ability for a deer tag) they just want to have their recreational opportunity. (don;t think so? Why do people want far more deer than can be sustained as a population just so they get a tag or maybe two or three tags? I do not condone &quot;cruel&quot; actions to kill any animal.&nbsp; Efficient ways to manage populations to minimize impacts................Don;t want &quot;dumbasses&quot; out there, allow permits for those areas with problems for those who are impacted.........3,2,1,</blockquote>

[QUOTE="gst, post: 152332, member: 373"] $12,000 sled and doing it in a "cruel" manner.............maybe there are "dumbasses" out there Indeed far "crueler" than being chased down by a plane. Seeing a baby calf being eaten alive is I guess not "cruel"............ya ya I know, natures way of doing things. The difference between us and the coyote is us humans choose what is an "ethical" way to kill something. (at least most of us do) (but then again in some other humans eyes we do not, so are they right? ) But then we justify our ethical stance by saying when the govt does something it is not "hunting" but "population control" so it is alright, even though if we honestly look at it hunting is population control. If most people were honest they would admit they did not care about maintaining a managable population of coyotes, or the impact an unmanaged population has (until they impact their ability for a deer tag) they just want to have their recreational opportunity. (don;t think so? Why do people want far more deer than can be sustained as a population just so they get a tag or maybe two or three tags? I do not condone "cruel" actions to kill any animal. Efficient ways to manage populations to minimize impacts................ Don;t want "dumbasses" out there, allow permits for those areas with problems for those who are impacted.........3,2,1, [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA