TRUMP allows ATV's!!!

Lycanthrope

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 6, 2015
Posts
7,358
Likes
2,634
Points
758
Location
Bismarck
TRUMP OPENS FEDERAL LANDS TO ATV RIDERS — RESTORING PUBLIC ACCESS AFTER DECADES OF GOVERNMENT LOCKOUT
President Trump just rescinded outdated 1970s executive orders that restricted motorized use on federal lands, delivering a major win for hardworking Americans who want real access to the public lands they own.
The Trump administration on Friday lifted restrictions dating back to Nixon’s EO 11644 and Carter’s 1977 update, which funneled ATVs, dirt bikes, and snowmobiles into limited areas while locking out everyday users.
Sweetwater County Commissioner Taylor Jones, an avid off-roader, cheered the move.
“Certainly, I’m thrilled,” Jones said. “I've always been a strong proponent for public access to public lands. There are a lot of areas in the national forest and in the mountains that should be open for access.”
Jones noted that current restrictions actually increase conflicts by concentrating users in small zones. Spreading access out, he said, will make it “easier to maintain balance” between different groups.
Dirt bike enthusiast Jason Harris of Lyman welcomed the change.
“If it means that I can ride my dirt bikes in some new places, then I’m stumping for it,” Harris said. He pointed out that lighter dirt bikes cause minimal impact, with vegetation recovering quickly, and celebrated less federal control over public lands.
Predictably, environmental activists are melting down. Sierra Club spokesman Nick Gevock called it a “terrible” idea that will supposedly push wildlife onto private land and spread weeds. Avid hiker Amber Travsky worried it gives too much freedom to off-roaders.
But the truth is simple: these are public lands, paid for by American taxpayers. For decades, bureaucrats and radical environmentalists treated them like private preserves for elites who want silence and restricted access. Trump is finally putting the public back in public lands.
This move prioritizes real multiple-use management over top-down closure. Americans who hunt, ride, and recreate outdoors are getting their access restored — and that’s exactly what public land should be.
 


Lycanthrope

Founding Member
Founding Member
Thread starter
Joined
May 6, 2015
Posts
7,358
Likes
2,634
Points
758
Location
Bismarck
Yes, the core claims in this post are accurate, based on recent events and reporting. It reflects a real policy action with the expected partisan framing (celebratory on access/multiple-use, critical from environmental groups).

whitehouse.gov +1
Key Facts That Check Out
  • On May 29, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Removing Unnecessary and Counterproductive Restrictions on Access to Federal Lands.” It explicitly rescinds Nixon’s EO 11644 (1972) and Carter’s EO 11989 (1977). These directed federal agencies (BLM, USFS, etc.) to manage off-road vehicles (ORVs—including ATVs, dirt bikes, snowmobiles) by designating routes/areas while minimizing damage to resources, wildlife harassment, user conflicts, and other impacts.

    whitehouse.gov
  • The orders formed the basis for decades of travel management plans that restricted motorized use in many areas to protect habitats, reduce conflicts with hikers/hunters/etc., and limit environmental damage. The new order directs agencies to revise or rescind implementing regulations, aiming for more access and “multiple-use” management.

    themeateater.com +1
  • This applies to federal lands (BLM, National Forests, etc.). Effects on National Parks are noted in coverage as potentially opening more areas, though implementation will take time via agency rulemaking—not an immediate free-for-all.

    nytimes.com
Quotes and Reactions
  • Sweetwater County Commissioner Taylor Jones and Jason Harris of Lyman (dirt bike enthusiast) — Their positive comments match the article nearly verbatim, including Jones on balance/public access and Harris on minimal impact from lighter bikes and less federal control.

    cowboystatedaily.com
  • Sierra Club’s Nick Gevock called it a “terrible” idea, citing risks like pushing wildlife onto private land, weed spread, habitat damage, and favoring off-roaders.

    cowboystatedaily.com
  • Amber Travsky (avid hiker/mountain biker from Laramie) expressed similar worries about too much freedom for off-roaders, existing designated areas sufficing, noise, and landscape damage.

    cowboystatedaily.com
The post’s source is essentially a Cowboy State Daily article (June 4, 2026) titled something very similar (“ATV Riders Cheer Trump Opening Access To Federal Lands, Critics Expect Disaster”), which the social media version adapts with enthusiastic pro-access commentary.

cowboystatedaily.com
Important Context and Nuance
  • Not a total “lockout” reversal yet: The EO removes the old mandates but agencies must still follow existing laws (e.g., FLPMA, NEPA) and update travel plans. Concentrated use in limited areas has indeed caused issues (erosion, conflicts), as supporters note. Critics highlight real risks: soil compaction, invasive species, wildlife disturbance, sediment in streams, and conflicts with non-motorized users. Both sides have evidence from studies on ORV impacts.

    winterwildlands.org
  • Public lands are taxpayer-owned and managed for multiple uses (recreation, grazing, mining, conservation), but “multiple use” has long been debated—environmental laws and court cases have shaped restrictions over decades.
  • Environmental groups (Sierra Club, Defenders of Wildlife, etc.) strongly oppose it as weakening protections. Motorized advocacy groups (e.g., BlueRibbon Coalition) support it as restoring access.

    defenders.org
Bottom line: The post accurately reports the EO, timing, historical context, local quotes, and polarized reactions. The interpretive spin (“restoring public access after government lockout,” “radicals treated them like private preserves,” etc.) is opinionated pro-recreation advocacy, but the underlying events and statements are factual. Implementation details will play out over time through agency processes.
 

SDMF

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
11,684
Likes
1,771
Points
663
Not going to knee-jerk one way or the other. I am interested to see what this actually means in practice. Can't say that I'm in favor of a "Free-For-All" of off-road travel, especially during big-game seasons. Full transparency, I sure wouldn't mind being able to use a vehicle to shoot prairie dogs.

You can take it to the bank that folks who hunt off horses aren't going to be happy about 1 single inch worth of extra area for ORV's.

Will be interesting to see what happens @ county registrar's offices researching what trails may have been open to public use previous to the Nixon/Carter EO's, even across private land.

I believe I'll wait for the dust to settle on much of this. I'm not chomping @ the bit to be the 1st person down a trail that's been closed for 50 years.
 


Obi-Wan

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Posts
10,562
Likes
8,511
Points
1,008
Location
Bismarck
Retrieval for downed big game animals would be nice, like it was before Clinton changed it on the national grasslands
 

Walleye Slayer

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 13, 2015
Posts
69
Likes
96
Points
162
Location
Pierre, SD
Retrieval for downed big game animals would be nice, like it was before Clinton changed it on the national grasslands
They do have zones in the Black Hills set up for that reason only and it is very effective and convenient. I think just opening up the lands as a free for all is not what is best for some areas. There needs to be some mangememt and oversight with some restrictions. I've lived and hunted the Black Hills for the better part of my life. I do not mind at all that ATV/UTV's are restricted to certain trails and roads and I make trips for riding at least once a year out there
 
Last edited:


wslayer

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2015
Posts
3,670
Likes
1,570
Points
578
Not sure if a big fan of this. Small example is the trails by the Pipestem they opened for atv/motorcycle, etc. Was fine to start with but fricken dickheads can't seem to stay on the trails. They think there's got to be something cool over that next knob, so away they go. No one ever out checking. Out west, I can't even imagine how much of that would be going on, and it would I guarantee, push animals onto private lands that you can't and never will be able to hunt. They aren't familiar to all the noise.
Retrieval of game, 100% all in on that.
 

Traxion

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 29, 2015
Posts
2,242
Likes
931
Points
408
Location
Western Sodak
Keep in mind this does not change any current rules. It opens the possibility of starting the process to change OHV travel plans for each individual jurisdiction. So that means maps have to be redrawn, new standards set, public hearings, etc.

I’m going to be the grumpy one here. I despise UTV’s anymore. The Black Hills are absolutely over run with them. We don’t get snow anymore so they’ve replaced the winter revenue. Even with limitations on travel, the trails and roads turn to shit. Puddles turned to mud bogs and the road is then 3x as wide because a few don’t want to get their rides dirty. I hunt areas with no access and multiple times a year see UTV’s where they aren’t supposed to be. The FS can enforce anything so it’s a free for all. I’m sure it’s a few bad apples but if you’re out in the hills in the summer it’s either the UTV or Harley scourge.

They have their place but users don’t know limits. I know where I hunt in WY by horse a UTV could never get there. But I worry pressure will push into those areas and make some of the fringe areas less fruitful.

I’m not getting worked up yet. I’m sure I’ll see clouds of dust this weekend as the endless trains of the cruise through the hills. Not going to change much here. Maybe if more access people will spread out. Gotta think positive lol!
 

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 57
  • This month: 18
  • This month: 15
  • This month: 14
  • This month: 14
  • This month: 12
  • This month: 11
  • This month: 9
  • This month: 9
  • This month: 9
Top Bottom